本文選題：文化福祉 + 指標(biāo)體系�。� 參考：《山東大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：生活質(zhì)量研究是社會發(fā)展到一定階段的產(chǎn)物。二十世紀(jì)八十年代以來,作為一個新興的社會科學(xué)研究領(lǐng)域,學(xué)術(shù)研究界出現(xiàn)大量以“生活質(zhì)量”為內(nèi)容的調(diào)查、研究；社會生活領(lǐng)域有關(guān)“生活質(zhì)量”的各種相關(guān)宣傳和用作商業(yè)用途的統(tǒng)計(jì)調(diào)查也不斷涌現(xiàn)。無論從科學(xué)研究的角度,還是從政策發(fā)展的視角,“生活質(zhì)量”近年來都呈現(xiàn)出迅猛發(fā)展的態(tài)勢。 文化的重要地位和作用決定了將文化福祉納入居民生活質(zhì)量綜合評價體系是題中應(yīng)有之義。社會的高度發(fā)展要求人們必須站在一個比以往更高的層次上來衡量社會的發(fā)展程度以及生活質(zhì)量的狀況。本文即是結(jié)合“十二五”規(guī)劃契機(jī),依托山東大學(xué)“中國城鄉(xiāng)居民生活質(zhì)量綜合指標(biāo)體系研究”課題已有研究成果,在統(tǒng)計(jì)分析“十一五”期間中國居民文化生活數(shù)據(jù)資料的基礎(chǔ)上,對原有文化福祉指標(biāo)體系進(jìn)行修正和應(yīng)用,旨在通過對2006-2010年間的文化生活具體指標(biāo)的量化統(tǒng)計(jì)分析,從公共政策的角度,評價比較中國居民文化需求保障狀況和滿足程度,并選取代表性省份作為例證,衡量各地區(qū)的文化發(fā)展水平,探求公共政策同文化福祉之間的內(nèi)在聯(lián)系,從而更好地了解現(xiàn)有文化政策實(shí)施現(xiàn)狀,收集文化政策實(shí)施反饋信息,發(fā)現(xiàn)政策盲點(diǎn)和“弱項(xiàng)”,分析其中的問題,并嘗試提出增進(jìn)中國文化福祉的公共政策建議。 本論文可分為三部分,共5章。 首先,第1章和第2章介紹文化福祉公共政策分析的選題背景,從社會指標(biāo)功能角度闡明選題研究意義與價值。通過搜集整理相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)資料形成文獻(xiàn)綜述,進(jìn)一步闡述選題的研究現(xiàn)狀。在歸納課題組已有研究成果基礎(chǔ)上,該部分還簡要介紹了文化福祉指標(biāo)篩選原則和過程,說明修正指標(biāo)。通過對統(tǒng)計(jì)數(shù)據(jù)無量綱化、主成分分析、加權(quán)等加工處理,最終形成文化福祉評價公式。 其次,第3章和第4章應(yīng)用文化福祉評價公式分別從居民文化生活整體狀況,教育水平和文化休閑資源等三方面對我國不同層次的文化福祉進(jìn)行測試,并從公共政策視角,對中國文化福祉測評結(jié)果就整體發(fā)展趨勢、區(qū)域?qū)用妗⑹‰H層面作出具體評價,從而衡量和比較各地區(qū)文化發(fā)展和建設(shè)的水平,分析其中存在的問題。 最后,第5章針對第二部分存在的問題,分別從教育水平和文化休閑資源兩方面提出相關(guān)公共文化政策建議,以期促進(jìn)文化福祉提升和發(fā)展建設(shè)水平。
[Abstract]:Quality of life research is the product of social development to a certain stage. Since the eighties of the 20th century, as a new field of social science research, a large number of "quality of life" investigation and research have appeared in academic research field. Social life related to the "quality of life" related publicity and commercial use of statistical surveys are also emerging. Whether from the angle of scientific research or from the perspective of policy development, the quality of life has developed rapidly in recent years. The important position and function of culture determines that it is necessary to integrate cultural well-being into the comprehensive evaluation system of residents' quality of life. The high development of society requires people to measure the degree of social development and the quality of life at a higher level than ever before. This paper combines the opportunity of the 12th Five-Year Plan, relying on the research results of Shandong University "Comprehensive Index system of quality of Life of Chinese Urban and Rural residents". Based on the statistical analysis of the data of Chinese residents' cultural life during the 11th Five-Year Plan period, the original index system of cultural well-being is revised and applied in order to make a quantitative statistical analysis of the specific indicators of cultural life between 2006 and 2010. From the perspective of public policy, this paper evaluates and compares the status and satisfaction of Chinese residents' cultural needs, and selects representative provinces as an example to measure the level of cultural development in various regions, and to explore the internal links between public policies and cultural well-being. In order to better understand the current situation of cultural policy implementation, collect feedback information, find blind spots and "weaknesses" of the policy, analyze the problems, and try to put forward public policy recommendations to promote the cultural well-being of China. This paper can be divided into three parts, a total of five chapters. First, chapter 1 and chapter 2 introduce the background of the public policy analysis of cultural well-being, and illustrate the significance and value of the research from the perspective of social indicators. Through collecting and collating relevant literature to form a literature review, further expatiate the research status of topic selection. On the basis of summarizing the existing research results of the research group, this part also briefly introduces the selection principles and processes of cultural well-being indicators, and explains the revised indicators. By processing statistical data dimensionless, principal component analysis and weighting, a formula for evaluating cultural well-being is formed. Secondly, in Chapter 3 and Chapter 4, the different levels of cultural well-being of our country are tested from three aspects: the overall situation of the residents' cultural life, the educational level and the cultural leisure resources, respectively, and from the perspective of public policy. The evaluation results of Chinese cultural well-being are evaluated on the overall development trend, regional level and inter-provincial level, so as to measure and compare the level of cultural development and construction in various regions, and analyze the existing problems. Finally, the fifth chapter aims at the problems in the second part, respectively from the education level and cultural leisure resources two aspects of the relevant public cultural policy recommendations, in order to promote cultural well-being and promote the development of the level of construction.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：G123

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 孫麗娜;;我國城市家庭休閑生活方式研究[J];才智;2010年01期

2 胡忠玲;;淺談如何提高教師素質(zhì)[J];長春師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年05期

3 張二勛;陳曉霞;;20世紀(jì)國外發(fā)展觀的嬗變與啟示[J];城市問題;2008年05期

4 李靜;;全面小康社會視野下的生活質(zhì)量研究[J];當(dāng)代財(cái)經(jīng);2005年12期

5 閻安;;和諧社會視野下我國老年人生活質(zhì)量研究[J];廣東工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2012年02期

6 王丹;鐘麗娟;;國外發(fā)展觀演變的歷史軌跡及評析[J];大連海事大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2008年02期

7 趙彥云,李靜萍;中國生活質(zhì)量評價、分析和預(yù)測[J];管理世界;2000年03期

8 馮國瑞;科學(xué)發(fā)展觀的哲學(xué)基礎(chǔ)[J];高校理論戰(zhàn)線;2005年03期

9 方秀云;提高城市老齡人口文化生活質(zhì)量的問題與對策研究[J];中共杭州市委黨校學(xué)報(bào);2005年03期

10 汪楊嵐;我國居民生活質(zhì)量的評價[J];市場論壇;2004年10期

，

本文編號：2012738