本文選題：馬爾庫 + 澳大利亞大學　； 參考：《學術交流》2017年03期

【摘要】：正青年馬爾庫什在研究中提出過這樣的問題,盧卡奇兩個時期是相互延續(xù),還是彼此斷裂?這個問題被提出來了,但是并沒有得到最終的解答�，F(xiàn)在我以同樣的問題向馬爾庫什提出來。他自己從來沒有這樣提出過。他告訴我,在莫斯科和布達佩斯,他首先對現(xiàn)代科學哲學、語言哲學以及認識論感興趣,還沒有對文化更不要說對藝術理論感興趣。只是到了澳大利亞,他才開始涉獵這些問題,然而那時因他所感興趣的東西使他在澳大利亞大學里飽受折磨,因為沒有人去探索文化。雖然他延續(xù)著以前,但是其著作顯示出斷裂,或者說至少顯現(xiàn)出處所的變化,世界觀的改變或者危機性。
[Abstract]:Markush, a young man, has raised the question of whether the two periods of Lukacs continue each other or break apart from each other. The question was raised, but no final answer was given. Now I put the same question to Markush. He had never made such a proposal himself. He told me that in Moscow and Budapest he was first interested in modern philosophy of science, philosophy of language, and epistemology, not yet in culture, let alone art theory. It was only when he arrived in Australia that he began to dabble in these problems, but at that time he was tortured in Australian universities by what he was interested in, because no one was going to explore culture. Although he continues his past, his books show a rupture, or at least a change in the place, a change in the worldview, or crisis.
【作者單位】： 四川大學文學與新聞學院;
【分類號】：G02

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前1條

1 G.馬爾庫什;孫建茵;;馬克思主義與文化理論[J];世界哲學;2010年02期

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 孫建茵;論現(xiàn)代性文化及其悖論[D];黑龍江大學;2010年

，

本文編號：1784538