【摘要】：1917-1945年間蘇聯(lián)與波羅的海三國關(guān)系的發(fā)展大致歷經(jīng)了三國贏得獨(dú)立、雙方和平共處、三國被蘇聯(lián)兼并三個(gè)階段。蘇聯(lián)對波羅的海三國的外交政策也歷經(jīng)了從列寧時(shí)代的和平外交、30年代集體安全嘗試、二戰(zhàn)前的安全自保的演變歷程。在列寧時(shí)代，蘇聯(lián)與波羅的海三國建立起平等的外交關(guān)系；歐洲法西斯勢力興起之后，蘇聯(lián)進(jìn)一步與波羅的海三國簽訂《國防安全互助條約》，在三國境內(nèi)設(shè)立軍事基地；隨著二戰(zhàn)的爆發(fā)及戰(zhàn)爭進(jìn)程的發(fā)展，蘇聯(lián)吞并了波羅的海三國。 蘇聯(lián)對波羅的海三國外交政策的演變主要源于歐洲安全格局的演變，德國的復(fù)興及法西斯化推動(dòng)了蘇聯(lián)采取一系列預(yù)防性安全政策，，不斷侵蝕波羅的海三國主權(quán)，直至兼并。俄國擴(kuò)張的歷史傳統(tǒng)及對波羅的海出�？诘南蛲翘K聯(lián)侵吞波羅的海三國的深層文化因素和國家利益的驅(qū)動(dòng)。斯大林的國家安全觀的實(shí)踐體現(xiàn)出蘇聯(lián)大國沙文主義和強(qiáng)權(quán)政治的理念。 蘇聯(lián)建國初期的和平外交是社會主義國家對外交往的成功實(shí)踐；30年代的集體安全是基于自愿互助原則而采取的必要舉措。然而，吞并波羅的海三國，建立所謂的“東方戰(zhàn)線”的政策則是赤裸裸的侵略，這既損害了蘇聯(lián)社會主義國家的形象，也未起到應(yīng)有的安全緩沖作用。蘇聯(lián)對波羅三國外交政策的經(jīng)驗(yàn)教訓(xùn)為當(dāng)今國際社會中的大國在處理與小國關(guān)系時(shí)提供借鑒。
[Abstract]:From 1917 to 1945, the development of the relations between the Soviet Union and the three Baltic states had three stages: the three countries won their independence, the two sides coexisted peacefully, and the three countries were annexed by the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union's foreign policy towards the three Baltic countries has also undergone the evolution from the peaceful diplomacy of Lenin's time, the collective security attempt in the 1930s and the self-protection of security before World War II. In Lenin's time, the Soviet Union established equal diplomatic relations with the three Baltic countries. After the rise of European fascist forces, the Soviet Union and the Baltic States signed the Treaty of Mutual Assistance for National Defense and Security and set up military bases in the three countries. With the outbreak of World War II and the development of the war process, the Soviet Union annexed the Baltic three countries. The evolution of the Soviet Union's foreign policy towards the three Baltic countries was mainly due to the evolution of the European security structure. The revival and fascism of Germany pushed the Soviet Union to adopt a series of preventive security policies, which continued to erode the sovereignty of the three Baltic countries until the annexation. The historical tradition of Russia's expansion and its yearning for the opening of the Baltic Sea are the deep cultural factors and national interests driven by Soviet usurpation of the three Baltic countries. The practice of Stalin's concept of national security embodies the concept of chauvinism and power politics of Soviet powers. The peaceful diplomacy in the early days of the founding of the Soviet Union was the successful practice of the socialist countries in their foreign exchanges, and collective security in the 1930s was a necessary measure based on the principle of voluntary mutual assistance. However, the policy of annexing the three Baltic states and establishing the so-called "Eastern Front" was an outright aggression, which damaged the image of the Soviet Socialist countries and did not serve as a security buffer. The experience and lessons of the Soviet Union's foreign policy to the three Baltic countries provide reference for the great powers in the international community in dealing with the relations with the small countries.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：江西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D851.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊家榮;試析蘇聯(lián)建國以來的對外政策[J];蘇聯(lián)東歐問題;1985年06期

2 金重遠(yuǎn);蘇聯(lián)外交和第二次世界大戰(zhàn)[J];俄羅斯研究;2005年02期

3 由然;列寧與波羅的海三國[J];東歐中亞研究;1992年02期

4 鐘志;鐘志;;從國際法的觀點(diǎn)看蘇德條約與波羅的海沿岸國家的命運(yùn)[J];今日蘇聯(lián)東歐;1990年06期

5 潘企麟;;蘇聯(lián)波羅的海沿岸共和國的歷史和民族概況[J];國際展望;1990年05期

6 李巨廉 ,潘人杰;關(guān)于二次大戰(zhàn)前史的若干問題[J];世界歷史;1979年05期

7 謝清溪;波羅的海三國獨(dú)立的歷史原因[J];世界歷史;1992年06期

8 李興;1939—1945年蘇聯(lián)的東歐政策剖析[J];世界歷史;2001年06期

9 李嘉谷;《蘇日中立條約》簽訂的國際背景及其對中蘇關(guān)系的影響[J];世界歷史;2002年04期

10 趙文亮,許國林;《蘇日中立條約》與中國[J];河南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2000年05期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 沈影;蘇聯(lián)領(lǐng)土擴(kuò)張研究[D];中國社會科學(xué)院研究生院;2009年

本文編號：2411852