【摘要】：當(dāng)前,聯(lián)合國(guó)氣候變化談判步履維艱,這在一定程度上凸顯了其制度安排的匱乏。因此,為實(shí)現(xiàn)全球溫室氣體減排的目標(biāo),聯(lián)合國(guó)氣候變化談判亟須拓展必要的制度創(chuàng)新。而契約經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)中不完全契約理論的前沿成果,無疑有助于揭開聯(lián)合國(guó)氣候變化談判的過程本質(zhì),并在一定意義上為未來氣候變化制度安排提供一種新的理論旨趣。對(duì)此,在聯(lián)合國(guó)氣候變化談判中,中國(guó)應(yīng)強(qiáng)化對(duì)程序性事項(xiàng)的考量,在碳排放的制度設(shè)計(jì)中密切關(guān)注產(chǎn)權(quán)安排;同時(shí),在有效防范制度設(shè)計(jì)對(duì)中國(guó)套牢的前提下,應(yīng)盡可能多地拓展中國(guó)氣候變化談判的剩余控制權(quán)。
[Abstract]:The UN climate change negotiations are struggling, partly underscoring the lack of institutional arrangements. Therefore, in order to achieve the goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions, the United Nations climate change negotiations need to expand the necessary institutional innovation. The frontier achievement of incomplete contract theory in contract economics is undoubtedly helpful to uncover the essence of the UN climate change negotiation process and to provide a new theoretical purport for the future climate change institutional arrangement. Therefore, in the United Nations climate change negotiations, China should strengthen the consideration of procedural issues and pay close attention to the property rights arrangement in the design of carbon emission system. At the same time, under the premise of the effective prevention system design, we should expand the residual control right of climate change negotiation.
【作者單位】： 山西大學(xué)科學(xué)技術(shù)哲學(xué)研究中心;
【基金】：國(guó)家社科基金項(xiàng)目“歐美新能源立法的制度性設(shè)計(jì)及中國(guó)的路徑選擇研究”(11CFX069) 中國(guó)法學(xué)會(huì)部級(jí)課題“德班平臺(tái)下應(yīng)對(duì)氣候變化單軌制安排的法律問題研究”(CLS(2013)D225)的階段性成果
【分類號(hào)】：D815;X2

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 谷德近;;資金機(jī)制:氣候變化談判的博弈焦點(diǎn)[J];上海金融;2008年09期

2 楊玉峰;苗韌;陳子佳;安琪;;《世界能源展望2009》對(duì)我國(guó)的啟示[J];中國(guó)能源;2009年11期

，

本文編號(hào)：2366897