【摘要】：全球化進(jìn)程與中國(guó)對(duì)外開放的深入,使中國(guó)與國(guó)際社會(huì)的相互依賴逐步加深。中國(guó)和平發(fā)展、民族復(fù)興、負(fù)責(zé)任大國(guó)的構(gòu)建,都需要和平穩(wěn)定的國(guó)際環(huán)境。聯(lián)合國(guó)維和是聯(lián)合國(guó)促進(jìn)國(guó)際和平穩(wěn)定的重要手段。作為發(fā)展中的大國(guó),中國(guó)參與聯(lián)合國(guó)維和是中國(guó)和平發(fā)展和負(fù)責(zé)任大國(guó)構(gòu)建的重要手段之一。國(guó)內(nèi)外對(duì)中國(guó)參與聯(lián)合國(guó)維和的研究主要從現(xiàn)實(shí)主義和新自由制度主義角度來探討中國(guó)參與維和的必要性、作用,但是由于每一種研究都存在著自身的缺陷如現(xiàn)實(shí)主義主要關(guān)注權(quán)力與斗爭(zhēng),新自由制度主義主要關(guān)注制度的功能與合作等,無法給予中國(guó)參與聯(lián)合國(guó)維和以全而的認(rèn)識(shí)。本文旨在以建構(gòu)主義的身份理論為分析工具,探討中國(guó)參與聯(lián)合國(guó)維和所遇到的身份困境或緊張以及這一困境對(duì)中國(guó)關(guān)于維和的決策和參與行動(dòng)所帶來的影響。在前半部分,構(gòu)建建構(gòu)主義身份理論分析模式,提出了關(guān)于中國(guó)參與維和的有關(guān)身份問題的四個(gè)假設(shè),在后半部分以歷時(shí)性的視角,通過實(shí)證的方法論證已提出的相關(guān)假設(shè)。驗(yàn)證的結(jié)果表明,中國(guó)參與維和所遇到的身份沖突或困境是明顯的,中國(guó)決策者面對(duì)身份沖突或困境的反應(yīng)和表現(xiàn)發(fā)生了從受制于意識(shí)形態(tài)的束縛與不成熟向理性和成熟的轉(zhuǎn)變。進(jìn)而得出的結(jié)論是,中國(guó)決策者已認(rèn)識(shí)到身份沖突或困境之于其參與維和的影響,積極主動(dòng)地作出調(diào)整,部分有效地克服不同身份沖突或困境的負(fù)面影響。本文認(rèn)為在未來,中國(guó)要想在聯(lián)合國(guó)維和中發(fā)揮更大的作用,使其成為中國(guó)構(gòu)建負(fù)責(zé)任大國(guó)的平臺(tái),就必須在身份以及其所代表的規(guī)范與認(rèn)同方面,與國(guó)際社會(huì)共同體的基本價(jià)值趨向一致,唯有如此,方能消除疑慮猜疑,化解分歧。在研究方法上,主要采用了規(guī)范性和描述性方法、歷史分析法和層次分析法相結(jié)合的辦法。
[Abstract]:The process of globalization and the deepening of China's opening to the outside world have deepened the interdependence between China and the international community. China needs a peaceful and stable international environment for its peaceful development, national rejuvenation, and the construction of a responsible power. Un peacekeeping is an important means for UN to promote international peace and stability. As a developing country, China's participation in UN peacekeeping is one of the important means for China's peaceful development and responsible power building. The domestic and foreign studies on China's participation in UN peacekeeping mainly discuss the necessity and role of China's participation in UN peacekeeping from the perspectives of realism and neo-liberal institutionalism. However, each research has its own shortcomings, such as realism, power and struggle, neo-liberal institutionalism, the function and cooperation of the system, and so on, so it is impossible to give China a full understanding of UN peacekeeping. The purpose of this paper is to use the constructivism identity theory as an analytical tool to explore the identity dilemma or tension encountered by China's participation in UN peacekeeping and the impact of this dilemma on China's decision-making and participation in peacekeeping operations. In the first part, the author constructs the analysis model of constructivism identity theory, puts forward four hypotheses about the identity of China's participation in peacekeeping, and proves the related hypotheses by empirical method in the second half from a diachronic perspective. The results of the verification show that the identity conflicts or dilemmas encountered by China in its participation in peacekeeping are obvious. The reaction and performance of Chinese decision makers in the face of identity conflicts or dilemmas have changed from ideological constraints and immaturity to rationality and maturity. The conclusion is that Chinese policy makers have realized the impact of identity conflict or dilemma on their participation in peacekeeping and actively adjusted to overcome the negative effects of different identity conflicts or dilemmas. This paper holds that in the future, if China wants to play a greater role in UN peacekeeping and make it a platform for China to build a responsible big country, it must be in terms of its identity and the norms and identities it represents. Only in line with the basic values of the international community can doubts and suspicions be dispelled and differences resolved. In the research methods, it mainly adopts normative and descriptive methods, historical analysis and analytic hierarchy process.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D813.2;D821

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王曉囡;;論中國(guó)參與聯(lián)合國(guó)維和行動(dòng)的意義[J];邊疆經(jīng)濟(jì)與文化;2010年06期

2 周琦;張建崗;;從國(guó)家安全利益的角度看中國(guó)對(duì)聯(lián)合國(guó)維和行動(dòng)認(rèn)知的改變[J];當(dāng)代世界與社會(huì)主義;2007年05期

3 趙磊;;中國(guó)參與聯(lián)合國(guó)維和行動(dòng)的類型及地域分析[J];當(dāng)代亞太;2009年02期

4 王樂豐;;論中國(guó)大規(guī)模參與聯(lián)合國(guó)維和的危機(jī)[J];大慶師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年01期

5 鐘龍彪;王俊;;中國(guó)對(duì)聯(lián)合國(guó)維持和平行動(dòng)的認(rèn)知和參與[J];當(dāng)代中國(guó)史研究;2006年06期

6 張慧玉;;試析中國(guó)參與聯(lián)合國(guó)維和機(jī)制對(duì)世界的影響[J];國(guó)際論壇;2009年05期

7 徐堅(jiān);論和平共處五項(xiàng)原則的理論與實(shí)踐[J];國(guó)際問題研究;2005年01期

8 秦亞青;;建構(gòu)主義:思想淵源、理論流派與學(xué)術(shù)理念[J];國(guó)際政治研究;2006年03期

9 肖蘭蘭;孫曉風(fēng);劉大勇;;中國(guó)參與非洲維和行動(dòng)的國(guó)際戰(zhàn)略利益分析[J];哈爾濱學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年10期

10 高小升;;中國(guó)參與聯(lián)合國(guó)維和機(jī)制的影響分析[J];湖北行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年03期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 詹世明;[N];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院院報(bào);2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 韓江濤;中國(guó)對(duì)達(dá)爾富爾問題政策探析[D];外交學(xué)院;2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：2221177