本文選題：歐盟競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法 + 市場(chǎng)支配地位�。� 參考：《貴州民族大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：歐盟競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法作為世界上最有影響力的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法體系之一，，已經(jīng)有較為成熟的框架對(duì)濫用市場(chǎng)支配地位的行為進(jìn)行規(guī)制，同時(shí)也給其他國(guó)家的相關(guān)立法提供了比較完善的歐洲模式，并對(duì)其關(guān)于濫用市場(chǎng)支配地位的反壟斷立法產(chǎn)生了積極的影響。從立法目的來(lái)看，歐盟競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法的首要目標(biāo)是維護(hù)自由平等的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)秩序及開(kāi)放的市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)環(huán)境，一個(gè)企業(yè)在市場(chǎng)上所占的地位決定著他的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)能力和水平。在競(jìng)爭(zhēng)市場(chǎng)上具有支配地位的企業(yè)占有明顯的優(yōu)勢(shì)，如果不恰當(dāng)?shù)乩眠@種優(yōu)勢(shì)地位，可能會(huì)使市場(chǎng)力量遭到破壞。市場(chǎng)支配地位如何確定、對(duì)市場(chǎng)支配地位行為被濫用的合理規(guī)制，及如何防止私法制度被濫用來(lái)限制競(jìng)爭(zhēng)等，無(wú)論是在競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法立法還是司法實(shí)踐上都是一個(gè)很重要的問(wèn)題。因此，研究歐盟對(duì)濫用市場(chǎng)支配地位的法律規(guī)制不僅在理論上有必要性，而且對(duì)保護(hù)自由開(kāi)放的市場(chǎng)和消費(fèi)者權(quán)益，并為維護(hù)歐洲統(tǒng)一開(kāi)放的大市場(chǎng)也具有十分重要的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。 本文主要分為三個(gè)部分，共三萬(wàn)多字。運(yùn)用經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析、比較分析，實(shí)證分析及案例分析的方法，著重分析研究歐盟對(duì)濫用市場(chǎng)支配地位法律規(guī)制的立法與實(shí)踐情況。 第一部分主要闡述歐盟競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法對(duì)濫用市場(chǎng)支配地位規(guī)制的立法規(guī)定。首先從歷史發(fā)展的視角對(duì)歐盟競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法的發(fā)展層次進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)化的梳理，闡述了歐盟競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法的各個(gè)階段的修改及條約的更新情況，并因此加以分析總結(jié)，得出在立法統(tǒng)一適用上表現(xiàn)為歐盟工作模式條約、歐盟理事會(huì)制定的規(guī)則及歐盟委員會(huì)制定的規(guī)則、指令和決定等三個(gè)層次。其次，在歐盟競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法體系中，對(duì)市場(chǎng)支配地位的認(rèn)定需要明確相關(guān)市場(chǎng)，包括產(chǎn)品市場(chǎng)、地域市場(chǎng)、時(shí)間市場(chǎng)三個(gè)因素�！稓W盟工作模式條約》第102條是歐盟競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法的核心條款之一，運(yùn)用概況加列舉的方式對(duì)濫用市場(chǎng)支配地位行為進(jìn)行規(guī)制。通過(guò)對(duì)條文的解讀及對(duì)濫用市場(chǎng)支配地位行為的構(gòu)成要件及濫用行為的分類(lèi)及表現(xiàn)形式進(jìn)行分析，從而采取相應(yīng)的法律措施來(lái)有效地規(guī)制濫用市場(chǎng)支配地位行為。 第二部分主要通過(guò)司法案例的方式對(duì)濫用市場(chǎng)支配地位行為進(jìn)行分類(lèi)實(shí)證研究。首先介紹了濫用市場(chǎng)支配地位行為的兩個(gè)抗辯原則，盡管歐盟不愿意使用“合理規(guī)則”這一術(shù)語(yǔ)，而寧愿使用“客觀必要性原則”的說(shuō)法，但是在立法和實(shí)踐中歐盟已經(jīng)越來(lái)越多的考慮合理原則的分析方法。其次，在實(shí)踐中的立場(chǎng)上，實(shí)施濫用行為是歐盟法院界定濫用支配地位的立足點(diǎn)；在認(rèn)定支配地位濫用的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)上，認(rèn)為具有支配地位的企業(yè)要承擔(dān)相對(duì)較多的社會(huì)責(zé)任，從而有利于保護(hù)市場(chǎng)上的中小競(jìng)爭(zhēng)者。最后通過(guò)兩個(gè)典型案例來(lái)具體闡述并分析歐盟競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法對(duì)濫用市場(chǎng)支配地位的規(guī)制在實(shí)踐中是如何運(yùn)用的，包括實(shí)踐中存在的問(wèn)題及歐盟法院與成員國(guó)法院之間的關(guān)系分析等。 第三部分主要立足于宏觀分析及歸納總結(jié)，通過(guò)對(duì)上文歐盟對(duì)濫用市場(chǎng)支配地位規(guī)制的立法分析、司法闡述及與我國(guó)的比較分析，來(lái)總結(jié)出歐盟競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法的成功經(jīng)驗(yàn)，并力圖為我國(guó)反壟斷法在對(duì)濫用市場(chǎng)支配地位規(guī)制的立法及司法實(shí)踐方面提供一些有益的啟示和借鑒。
[Abstract]:As one of the most influential competition law systems in the world, EU competition law has a more mature framework to regulate the abuse of market dominance, and also provides a relatively perfect European model for related legislation in other countries, and has produced a positive effect on its antitrust legislation on the abuse of the dominant position of the market. From the point of view of legislation, the primary goal of the EU competition law is to maintain a free and equal competition order and open market economic environment. The position of an enterprise in the market determines his competitive ability and level. The dominant enterprises in the competitive market occupy an obvious advantage, if it is not used properly. The dominant position may cause the market force to be destroyed. How to determine the dominant position of the market, the rational regulation of the abuse of the dominant position in the market, and how to prevent the private law from being used to restrict the competition are an important issue in both the legislation of competition law and the judicial practice. The legal regulation of market dominant position is not only necessary in theory, but also to protect the free and open market and consumers' rights and interests, and to safeguard the unification of Europe open market also has very important practical significance.
This paper is divided into three parts, a total of more than 30000 words. The use of economic analysis, comparative analysis, empirical analysis and case analysis methods, focusing on the analysis of the legislation and practice of the legal regulation of the abuse of market dominance.
The first part mainly expounds the legislative provisions of the EU Competition Law on the abuse of dominant position in the market. First, it systematically combs the development level of the EU competition law from the perspective of historical development, expounds the changes of the various stages of the EU competition law and the renewal of the treaty, and thus analyses and summarizes the legislative unity. It is applicable to the three levels of the EU working model treaty, the rules formulated by the European Council and the rules, instructions and decisions made by the European Commission. Secondly, in the EU competition law system, the identification of market dominance needs clear related markets, including three factors such as product market, regional market and time market. < European Union 'work. The 102nd article of the model treaty is one of the core clauses of the EU competition law. It uses an overview and enumeration to regulate the abuse of the dominant position in the market. Through the interpretation of the provisions and the analysis of the elements of the abuse of market dominance and the classification and expression of the abuse behavior, the corresponding legal measures are taken. To effectively regulate the abuse of market dominance.
The second part mainly classifies the misuse of market dominance behavior through judicial cases. First, it introduces the two defense principles of abusing market dominant position, although the EU is reluctant to use the term "reasonable rules" and prefers to use the "principle of objectivity of objectivity", but it is in legislation and In practice, the European Union has increasingly considered the analytical method of rational principles. Secondly, in the position of practice, the implementation of abuse is the foothold of the European Court to define the abuse of dominant position; in the standard of determining the abuse of dominant position, it is considered that the dominant enterprises should bear relatively more social responsibility and thus benefit To protect the small and medium competitors on the market. Finally, two typical cases are used to elaborate and analyze the application of the EU competition law to the abuse of market dominance in practice, including the problems in practice and the analysis of the relationship between the EU court and the court of the member states.
The third part is mainly based on the macro analysis and summary. Through the legislative analysis, judicial exposition and comparative analysis of the abuse of market dominance in the European Union, the successful experience of the EU competition law is summed up, and the legislation and judicial practice of the regulation of the dominant position of the anti monopoly law in the indiscriminate market in China is drawn. Some useful revelations and lessons are provided.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：貴州民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D912.29;D814.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 徐士英;唐茂軍;;濫用相對(duì)支配地位行為的法律規(guī)制研究[J];東方法學(xué);2008年03期

2 王先林;;論反壟斷法實(shí)施中的相關(guān)市場(chǎng)界定[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2008年01期

3 肖江平;;濫用市場(chǎng)支配地位行為認(rèn)定中的“正當(dāng)理由”[J];法商研究;2009年05期

4 王艷林;;中國(guó)《反壟斷法》的規(guī)制對(duì)象及其確立方法[J];法學(xué)雜志;2008年01期

5 鄭文通;;我國(guó)反壟斷訴訟對(duì)“濫用市場(chǎng)支配地位”規(guī)定的誤讀[J];法學(xué);2010年05期

6 陳兵;;我國(guó)《反壟斷法》“濫用市場(chǎng)支配地位”條款適用問(wèn)題辨識(shí)[J];法學(xué);2011年01期

7 王先林;論市場(chǎng)支配地位及其濫用的規(guī)制問(wèn)題[J];中國(guó)工商管理研究;2000年06期

8 李小明;;反壟斷法中濫用市場(chǎng)支配地位的違法認(rèn)定問(wèn)題研究[J];河北法學(xué);2007年11期

9 羅先覺(jué);;美國(guó)、歐盟、韓國(guó)、日本微軟案件比較研究——以軟件產(chǎn)業(yè)中濫用支配地位的認(rèn)定和規(guī)制為視角[J];河北法學(xué);2010年12期

10 王宏;;歐盟競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)人濫用市場(chǎng)支配地位之規(guī)制——從歐洲法院的視角解析《歐共體條約》第82條[J];河南司法警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 劉帥賢;發(fā)展中國(guó)家對(duì)跨國(guó)投資壟斷行為的規(guī)制[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2008年

本文編號(hào)：2045880