本文選題：俄日關(guān)系 + 領(lǐng)土爭議��； 參考：《遼寧大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：俄日關(guān)系是當(dāng)今國際社會上重要的雙邊關(guān)系之一，它不僅關(guān)系著兩國之間在各個領(lǐng)域的交流和合作，還關(guān)系著東北亞地區(qū)的穩(wěn)定和安全。但是由于兩國在南千島群島（日本稱北方四島）的歸屬上存在著爭議，使得俄日關(guān)系變得極為脆弱和敏感。南千島群島（日本稱北方四島）對東北亞地區(qū)的安全和穩(wěn)定具有重要作用。 進入21世紀(jì)，世界經(jīng)濟全球化的趨勢不斷加強，，相對于領(lǐng)土問題談判陷入僵局，俄日兩國在經(jīng)濟和能源方面展開了積極的合作與交流，但是不得不承認領(lǐng)土問題成為兩國進一步深化合作與交流的最大阻力。本文對俄日爭議領(lǐng)土問題進行分析、研究以解決領(lǐng)土糾紛的國際法為原則，闡述了南千島群島（日本稱北方四島）歷史上歸屬。隨著美蘇關(guān)系的惡化和冷戰(zhàn)的開始，南千島群島成為雙方斗爭的前沿陣地。日本堅持要收回俄日爭議領(lǐng)土，前蘇聯(lián)堅持自己是通過國際條約合法占有，拒絕日本的要求，雙方對這一問題雖然經(jīng)過多次談判，并且在外交上也作出調(diào)整，但都沒有結(jié)果。俄日兩國戰(zhàn)后60余年沒有簽訂和平條約，領(lǐng)土問題是最重要的制約因素。近年來，日本迫切希望利用經(jīng)濟援助和能源合作打開解決領(lǐng)土問題的大門，但是影響領(lǐng)土問題既有兩國國內(nèi)的政治、經(jīng)濟和民族性格因素，也國際因素如美國因素、東北亞地區(qū)現(xiàn)狀和國際法因素。眾多復(fù)雜的因素導(dǎo)致俄日爭議領(lǐng)土問題一直沒能解決，這對東北亞地區(qū)的安全和穩(wěn)定埋下了不和諧的音符。 俄日之間因為領(lǐng)土問題發(fā)生戰(zhàn)爭的可能性不大。雙方在談判的基礎(chǔ)上提出了解決爭端的方法，并對俄日兩國解決此問題作出了展望。領(lǐng)土問題是橫在兩國關(guān)系之間的障礙，雙方雖然發(fā)出了積極協(xié)商解決此問題的信號，由于兩國政府強硬的態(tài)度，要想在短時間內(nèi)解決此問題還是有一定難處。但并不排除兩國領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人順應(yīng)時代潮流，妥善處理矛盾，最后俄日解決爭議領(lǐng)土問題或者共同合作開發(fā)的可能。
[Abstract]:The Russian-Japanese relationship is one of the most important bilateral relations in the international community. It relates not only to the exchanges and cooperation between the two countries in various fields, but also to the stability and security of Northeast Asia. But the dispute between the two countries over the ownership of the South Kuril Islands, known as the four northern islands in Japan, has made relations between Russia and Japan extremely fragile and sensitive. The South Kuril Islands play an important role in the security and stability of Northeast Asia. In the 21st century, the trend of the globalization of the world economy has been constantly strengthened. In contrast to the deadlock in the negotiations on territorial issues, Russia and Japan have carried out active cooperation and exchanges in the economic and energy fields. However, it has to be acknowledged that territorial issues have become the biggest resistance to further deepening cooperation and exchanges between the two countries. Based on the analysis of the disputed territory between Russia and Japan and the principle of international law to resolve the territorial dispute, this paper expounds the historical ownership of the South Kuril Islands (the four northern islands of Japan). With the deterioration of U.S.-Soviet relations and the beginning of the Cold War, the South Kuril Islands became the frontier of the struggle between the two sides. Japan insisted on recovering the disputed territory between Russia and Japan, and the former Soviet Union insisted that it had legally occupied it through an international treaty and rejected Japan's request. Although the two sides have repeatedly negotiated this issue and also made diplomatic adjustments, it has failed to achieve results. Russia and Japan did not sign a peace treaty more than 60 years after the war. In recent years, Japan has been eager to use economic assistance and energy cooperation to open the door to a solution to the territorial issue. However, the territorial issue is affected by political, economic and national factors of the two countries as well as international factors such as the United States. The present situation of Northeast Asia and the factors of International Law. Many complicated factors have caused the disputed territorial issue between Russia and Japan to remain unresolved, which has laid a disharmonious note on the security and stability of Northeast Asia. A war between Russia and Japan over territorial issues is unlikely. On the basis of negotiation, the two sides put forward a solution to the dispute, and made a prospect for the two countries to solve the problem. The territorial issue is an obstacle between the two countries. Although the two sides have sent the signal of positive negotiation to solve the problem, due to the strong attitude of the two governments, it is still difficult to solve the problem in a short time. However, it is not ruled out that the leaders of the two countries conform to the trend of the times, properly handle contradictions, and finally Russia and Japan resolve the disputed territorial issue or work together to develop it.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D851.2;D815.3

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王逸舟;《聯(lián)合國海洋法公約》生效后的國際關(guān)系[J];百科知識;1996年06期

2 周韜;日俄“北方領(lǐng)土”之爭及其解決前景探析[J];湖南文理學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2005年02期

3 王澤林;;日本與鄰國領(lǐng)土主權(quán)爭端的國際法分析[J];東北亞論壇;2009年03期

4 孫叔林;俄羅斯政權(quán)更迭及其亞太政策走向[J];當(dāng)代亞太;2000年05期

5 何月香;俄日領(lǐng)土糾紛難以解決原因分析[J];當(dāng)代亞太;2003年03期

6 陸鋼;九一一事件后俄日關(guān)系的發(fā)展趨勢[J];當(dāng)代亞太;2003年04期

7 沈丁立;;中美關(guān)系、中日關(guān)系以及東北亞國際關(guān)系[J];當(dāng)代亞太;2009年02期

8 李勇慧;“疏遠”的鄰居——俄日之間的信任問題[J];俄羅斯中亞東歐研究;2005年02期

9 李勇慧;“北方領(lǐng)土”主權(quán)終歸誰屬——試析俄日“北方領(lǐng)土”之爭[J];東歐中亞研究;1999年01期

10 陳潔華;艱難調(diào)整中的俄日關(guān)系[J];俄羅斯研究;2004年03期

本文編號：1780491