本文選題：中俄關(guān)系　切入點(diǎn)：制度化　出處：《華中師范大學(xué)》2012年博士論文

【摘要】：隨著21世紀(jì)的逐漸展開,中俄關(guān)系變得愈加重要,中俄關(guān)系的制度化需求也越來越強(qiáng)。中俄兩國(guó)自20世紀(jì)90年代以來,雙邊關(guān)系經(jīng)歷從“相互友好關(guān)系”到“建設(shè)性伙伴關(guān)系”再到“戰(zhàn)略協(xié)作伙伴關(guān)系”的發(fā)展,其每一步進(jìn)展都伴隨雙方制度化的建設(shè)。推動(dòng)中俄兩國(guó)不斷走向制度化的因素既有國(guó)際制度化潮流的激勵(lì),也有對(duì)中蘇同盟“非制度化”的歷史反思,而中俄兩國(guó)在政治上的相互借重、經(jīng)濟(jì)上的相互依賴及安全上的密不可分更是決定了雙方存在制度化合作的需求。受歷史和文化因素的影響,中俄兩國(guó)對(duì)制度觀念缺乏必要的了解和認(rèn)知,新時(shí)期兩國(guó)制度化發(fā)展的需求促使雙方進(jìn)行了新的制度、安全和合作觀念的建構(gòu)。經(jīng)過雙方的共同努力,中俄兩國(guó)目前已經(jīng)在政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、安全、人文等領(lǐng)域建立了全方位的制度化合作機(jī)制。這些機(jī)制推動(dòng)著中俄兩國(guó)關(guān)系的制度化發(fā)展,并使其日益呈現(xiàn)出制度累積的特征,在兩國(guó)高層的大力推動(dòng)下,兩國(guó)的制度化動(dòng)力也開始由外部動(dòng)力向內(nèi)生動(dòng)力轉(zhuǎn)化。 中俄關(guān)系的制度化經(jīng)歷了近20年的發(fā)展,成效顯著。中俄兩國(guó)的相互信任日益增強(qiáng),雙方的信息溝通渠道和爭(zhēng)端解決通道日益順暢,推進(jìn)了中俄雙邊關(guān)系的健康穩(wěn)定發(fā)展。但同時(shí)也存在著一些諸如制度化的結(jié)構(gòu)框架還較為松散、雙方對(duì)制度化的重視程度有別、制度化的經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)基礎(chǔ)較為薄弱及不同領(lǐng)域的制度化效果失衡等具體問題。目前,中俄關(guān)系的制度化建設(shè)已經(jīng)進(jìn)入到新的發(fā)展階段。然而,國(guó)家利益的多維性和動(dòng)態(tài)性、美國(guó)因素的持續(xù)影響、經(jīng)貿(mào)領(lǐng)域的滯后發(fā)展、中俄“雙崛起”可能引發(fā)的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)、“中國(guó)威脅論”的錯(cuò)誤認(rèn)知等消極因素的存在,卻使得中俄關(guān)系制度化的進(jìn)一步發(fā)展面臨嚴(yán)峻的挑戰(zhàn)。在此基礎(chǔ)上,本文對(duì)中俄關(guān)系制度化未來可能出現(xiàn)的前景進(jìn)行了大膽預(yù)測(cè),并提供了盡可能的政策建議。從長(zhǎng)遠(yuǎn)角度看,為保證中俄兩國(guó)關(guān)系繼續(xù)在穩(wěn)定的、可預(yù)見的環(huán)境中不斷發(fā)展下去,雙方應(yīng)以戰(zhàn)略的眼光去審視和把握中俄關(guān)系制度化建設(shè)的未來前景,共同推進(jìn)兩國(guó)關(guān)系沿著正確的軌道不斷向前發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:With the gradual development of the 21st century, Sino-Russian relations have become more and more important, and the need for institutionalization of Sino-Russian relations has become increasingly strong. Bilateral relations have evolved from "mutual friendly relations" to "constructive partnerships" to "strategic cooperative partnerships". Every step of its progress has been accompanied by the institutionalization of both sides. The factors driving China and Russia to move toward institutionalization include both the encouragement of the international trend of institutionalization and the historical reflection on the "non-institutionalization" of the Sino-Soviet alliance. And the mutual reliance of China and Russia on politics, the interdependence of economy and the inseparable security of the two countries also determine the need for institutionalized cooperation between the two sides. Influenced by historical and cultural factors, China and Russia lack the necessary understanding and cognition of the concept of system. The demand for institutionalization of the two countries in the new period has prompted the two sides to construct a new concept of system, security and cooperation. Through the joint efforts of both sides, At present, China and Russia have established all-round institutionalized cooperation mechanisms in the fields of politics, economy, security, humanities, etc. These mechanisms promote the institutionalization of Sino-Russian relations and make them increasingly show the characteristics of institutional accumulation. Under the push of the high-level of the two countries, the institutional power of the two countries also began to change from the external power to the endogenous power. The institutionalization of Sino-Russian relations has experienced nearly 20 years of development, with remarkable results. The mutual trust between China and Russia is increasing, and the channels of information communication and dispute settlement between the two sides are becoming increasingly smooth. It has promoted the healthy and stable development of bilateral relations between China and Russia. However, at the same time, there are still some structural frameworks such as institutionalization that are relatively loose, and both sides attach different importance to institutionalization. At present, the institutionalization of Sino-Russian relations has entered a new stage of development. However, the multi-dimensional and dynamic nature of national interests, The continued influence of American factors, the lagging development of economic and trade fields, the possible competition caused by the "dual rise" of China and Russia, and the existence of negative factors such as the erroneous cognition of the "China threat" theory, However, the further development of the institutionalization of Sino-Russian relations is facing severe challenges. On this basis, this paper makes a bold prediction of the possible future prospects for the institutionalization of Sino-Russian relations, and provides as many policy suggestions as possible. In order to ensure that Sino-Russian relations continue to develop in a stable and predictable environment, both sides should examine and grasp the future prospects of the institutionalization of Sino-Russian relations from a strategic perspective. We should work together to push forward bilateral relations along the right track.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D822.3;D851.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳憲良;張梅;;俄對(duì)華政策的變化及中國(guó)策略應(yīng)對(duì)[J];東北亞論壇;2009年02期

2 邢廣程;;中俄崛起對(duì)兩國(guó)關(guān)系的影響[J];當(dāng)代亞太;2009年01期

3 李海龍;;一個(gè)綜合視角下的國(guó)際制度化動(dòng)力分析[J];東南亞縱橫;2010年01期

4 馬風(fēng)書;中俄關(guān)系中的美國(guó)因素[J];當(dāng)代世界社會(huì)主義問題;2002年02期

5 劉克明;中蘇關(guān)系40年的歷史教訓(xùn)[J];東歐中亞研究;2000年01期

6 姜毅;安全兩難與中俄關(guān)系[J];東歐中亞研究;2002年05期

7 許志新;普京時(shí)期俄羅斯對(duì)外戰(zhàn)略解析[J];俄羅斯中亞東歐研究;2004年03期

8 吳大輝;防范中的合作——俄羅斯關(guān)于中國(guó)和平崛起的心理圖解[J];俄羅斯中亞東歐研究;2005年05期

9 М.Л.季塔連科;馮育民;;俄中戰(zhàn)略伙伴關(guān)系是保障國(guó)際安全的一種模式[J];俄羅斯中亞東歐研究;2008年01期

10 米·列·季塔連科;李芳華;;全球危機(jī)和維護(hù)國(guó)際穩(wěn)定背景下的俄中兩國(guó)合作[J];俄羅斯中亞東歐研究;2009年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：1662668