本文選題：霸權(quán)護(hù)持　切入點(diǎn)：權(quán)力制衡　出處：《世界經(jīng)濟(jì)與政治》2017年03期

【摘要】：現(xiàn)實(shí)主義理論認(rèn)為權(quán)力的過(guò)度集中會(huì)引發(fā)其他行為體的權(quán)力制衡,鑒于國(guó)際體系中經(jīng)常出現(xiàn)"制衡失靈"的現(xiàn)象,霸權(quán)何以維持成為需要解釋的問(wèn)題�，F(xiàn)有文獻(xiàn)大多從其他國(guó)家的角度思考為何出現(xiàn)"制衡不足",但是,作為有實(shí)力和意愿控制國(guó)際秩序的國(guó)家,霸權(quán)國(guó)不會(huì)消極等待其他國(guó)家的權(quán)力制衡,而會(huì)積極運(yùn)用權(quán)力制衡維持霸權(quán)地位。作者提出話語(yǔ)制衡是霸權(quán)護(hù)持的重要手段,即通過(guò)使用話語(yǔ)策略在國(guó)內(nèi)外建立話語(yǔ)共識(shí)和政策聯(lián)盟,以維持國(guó)際霸權(quán)結(jié)構(gòu)。具體表現(xiàn)為三種形式:一是旨在建立國(guó)內(nèi)政策聯(lián)盟的內(nèi)部話語(yǔ)制衡,二是旨在建立國(guó)際霸權(quán)聯(lián)盟的外部話語(yǔ)制衡,三是旨在阻止?jié)撛谔魬?zhàn)的消極話語(yǔ)制衡。強(qiáng)大的話語(yǔ)資本和對(duì)霸權(quán)地位的追求讓霸權(quán)國(guó)擁有話語(yǔ)制衡的先發(fā)優(yōu)勢(shì)。話語(yǔ)制衡也存在局限,容易加劇霸權(quán)國(guó)的不安全感和國(guó)際體系的不穩(wěn)定。作者旨在探究霸權(quán)國(guó)如何通過(guò)話語(yǔ)層面的權(quán)力制衡進(jìn)行霸權(quán)護(hù)持,并以美國(guó)亞太再平衡戰(zhàn)略為例,增進(jìn)對(duì)美國(guó)霸權(quán)話語(yǔ)策略的理解。
[Abstract]:The theory of realism holds that excessive concentration of power will lead to the balance of power of other actors. In view of the phenomenon of "check and balance failure" in the international system, Why hegemony remains an issue to be explained. Most of the existing literature considers from the perspective of other countries why there is "insufficient checks and balances", but as a country with the power and will to control the international order, The hegemonic state will not wait passively for the power balance of other countries, but will actively use the power balance to maintain the hegemonic position. That is, to maintain the international hegemonic structure by building discourse consensus and policy alliance at home and abroad through the use of discourse strategy, which is manifested in three forms: first, the internal discourse balance aimed at establishing domestic policy alliances. Second, external discourse checks and balances aimed at establishing an international hegemonic alliance, Thirdly, negative discourse checks and balances aimed at preventing potential challenges. Strong discourse capital and the pursuit of hegemonic status make hegemonic countries have the preemptive advantages of discourse checks and balances, and there are also limitations in discourse checks and balances. It is easy to aggravate the insecurity of hegemonic powers and the instability of the international system. The author aims to explore how hegemonic powers defend their hegemony through power checks and balances at the discourse level, and take the rebalancing strategy of the United States in Asia and the Pacific as an example. To improve the understanding of American hegemonic discourse strategy.
【作者單位】： 外交學(xué)院;
【基金】：“外交學(xué)院2015年度學(xué)生科研創(chuàng)新基金項(xiàng)目”成果 “中央高�；究蒲袠I(yè)務(wù)費(fèi)專項(xiàng)資金資助項(xiàng)目”(項(xiàng)目編號(hào):ZY2015YA22)成果
【分類號(hào)】：D815

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 葉自成;王日華;;中國(guó)和平發(fā)展與國(guó)際環(huán)境的理論總結(jié):崛起國(guó)與霸權(quán)國(guó)關(guān)系的新模式[J];國(guó)際觀察;2008年01期

2 王波;;霸權(quán)國(guó)內(nèi)部民主與對(duì)外霸權(quán)的互動(dòng)[J];江南社會(huì)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年02期

3 朱云漢;劉康;黃e，

本文編號(hào)：1654038