發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-18 15:01

  本文選題：歐盟　切入點(diǎn)：規(guī)范性力量歐盟　出處：《復(fù)旦大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：20世紀(jì)90年代以來(lái),歐盟對(duì)氣候變化問(wèn)題所做出的積極承諾已得到了廣泛關(guān)注。歐盟在氣候變化方面所做出的貢獻(xiàn)是與它規(guī)范性力量這一身份定位相一致的。其長(zhǎng)期致力于建立一個(gè)新的氣候體制以遏制全球氣候變暖,這來(lái)源于歐盟對(duì)于其綠色規(guī)范性力量的自我認(rèn)同感。本文首先通過(guò)分析,認(rèn)為歐盟在氣候變化領(lǐng)域的具體表現(xiàn)體現(xiàn)了其綠色規(guī)范性力量的基本要求。歐盟法律體系中所體現(xiàn)的可持續(xù)發(fā)展原則、多邊主義原則和預(yù)防性原則為歐盟在氣候變化領(lǐng)域發(fā)揮規(guī)范性力量提供了規(guī)范性基礎(chǔ)。之后,本文從規(guī)范性力量視角分析了歐盟氣候領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)的德與失。本文認(rèn)為歐盟在全球氣候變化中的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)來(lái)源于其綠色規(guī)范性力量的構(gòu)建。規(guī)范性力量歐盟通過(guò)“以身作則”這一策略,成功領(lǐng)導(dǎo)并推動(dòng)了京都議定書(shū)的協(xié)商、簽字和批準(zhǔn)。但之后歐盟在哥本哈根氣候大會(huì)中卻淪為旁觀者,甚至在會(huì)議的最后階段被邊緣化。歐盟在哥本哈根的失利是多種因素共同作用的結(jié)果,但除了歐盟不可控的外部原因以外,本文認(rèn)為歐盟規(guī)范性力量的解構(gòu)從根本上導(dǎo)致了歐盟氣候領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)的弱化。這具體表現(xiàn)在三個(gè)方面：一,減排誠(chéng)意不足,削弱榜樣力量；二,忽視他國(guó)利益訴求,過(guò)度強(qiáng)調(diào)自身立場(chǎng),背離多邊主義原則；三,規(guī)范性力量受到經(jīng)濟(jì)利益等因素的制約。哥本哈根大會(huì)后,歐盟痛定思痛,試圖重塑其在全球氣候變化中領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)。然而歐盟如今面臨著許多新的挑戰(zhàn),這一定程度上制約了歐盟在氣候變化談判中的意愿和能力。但這并不意味著歐盟不能在進(jìn)行中的氣候談判中發(fā)揮重要作用。為了加強(qiáng)歐盟在氣候變化治理的影響力,歐盟需要做出調(diào)整。一方面,歐盟需要重塑其“以身作則”的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)策略。另一方面,歐盟需要調(diào)整其領(lǐng)導(dǎo)方式,加強(qiáng)與其他國(guó)際行為體,特別是美國(guó)和金磚四國(guó)的國(guó)際協(xié)商與合作,以保有其在氣候變化領(lǐng)域的話語(yǔ)權(quán)與影響力,避免哥本哈根悲劇的重演。
[Abstract]:Since 1990s, The EU's positive commitment to climate change has received wide attention. The EU's contribution to climate change is consistent with its identity as a normative force. A new climate regime to curb global warming, This comes from the EU's self-identity with its green normative power. Considering that the concrete performance of the European Union in the field of climate change embodies the basic requirements of its green normative power, and the principles of sustainable development embodied in the EU legal system, The principles of multilateralism and prevention provide a normative basis for the EU to exercise its normative power in the area of climate change. This paper analyzes the morality and loss of the EU's climate leadership from the perspective of normative power. This paper argues that the EU's leadership in global climate change comes from the construction of its green normative power. "this strategy," Successfully led and promoted the negotiation, signature and ratification of the Kyoto Protocol. But the European Union became a bystander at the Copenhagen Climate Conference. Marginalized even in the final stages of the conference. The EU's failure in Copenhagen was the result of a combination of factors, but with the exception of external causes that the EU could not control, This paper argues that the deconstruction of EU normative forces has fundamentally led to the weakening of the EU's climate leadership. This is manifested in three aspects: first, lack of sincerity in reducing emissions, weakening the exemplary force; second, neglecting the interests of other countries. Overemphasize its position and deviate from the principle of multilateralism; third, normative forces are constrained by factors such as economic interests. Trying to reshape its leadership on global climate change. But the EU now faces many new challenges. This limits to some extent the EU's willingness and ability to negotiate climate change. But this does not mean that the EU cannot play an important role in the ongoing climate negotiations. The EU needs to adjust. On the one hand, it needs to reshape its leadership strategy of "leading by example." on the other hand, it needs to adapt its leadership to strengthen its engagement with other international actors. In particular, the United States and the BRIC countries have negotiated and cooperated internationally to retain their voice and influence in the area of climate change and to avoid a repeat of the Copenhagen tragedy.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D81;P467

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 宋黎磊;;關(guān)于歐盟作為一種規(guī)范性力量的討論[J];德國(guó)研究;2008年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：1630084