本文選題：羅文干案　切入點(diǎn)：奧款展期合同　出處：《近代史研究》2016年05期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：震驚中外的羅文干案因奧款合同展期而發(fā)生,一直被視為政治陷害。法院最終判被告無(wú)罪,既有學(xué)術(shù)研究將法院判決視為定讞,無(wú)人置疑。但有關(guān)史料證明,針對(duì)羅文干的三項(xiàng)犯罪指控并非向壁虛構(gòu)。就訴訟程序言,告訴初始階段雖不盡規(guī)范,但國(guó)務(wù)會(huì)議聲請(qǐng)?jiān)僮h羅案經(jīng)法院裁定及法界公斷程序合法,反證蔡元培等人維護(hù)"司法獨(dú)立"的抗議舉動(dòng),缺乏法律依據(jù)。羅案被告的無(wú)罪宣判,與蔡元培辭職抗議引發(fā)大規(guī)模學(xué)潮、法潮,形成強(qiáng)大的"院外審判"輿論環(huán)境,極大地改變了羅案檢審的法律生態(tài)有關(guān)。此案不僅展示了法政關(guān)系的復(fù)雜與近代中外關(guān)系的緊張,也揭示出國(guó)人對(duì)法制現(xiàn)代化的認(rèn)識(shí)誤區(qū),提示中國(guó)的法制現(xiàn)代化建設(shè)路漫修遠(yuǎn)。
[Abstract]:The Luo Wen case, which shocked China and foreign countries, has always been regarded as a political frame because of the extension of the Austrian contract. The court finally found the defendant not guilty. There is no doubt that the court's decision has been regarded as conclusive and unquestioned by academic research. But the relevant historical data prove that, The three criminal charges against Luo Wen were not fictitious. In terms of the proceedings, although the initial stage was not standardized, the Council of State claimed that the Luo case had been decided by the court and that the adjudication procedure in the legal field was lawful. Contrary to the protest by Cai Yuanpei and others to safeguard the "independence of the judiciary", there is no legal basis. The acquittal of the defendant in the Luo case, and the resignation of the defendant with Cai Yuanpei, triggered a massive wave of study and law, and formed a strong "outside court trial" environment of public opinion. This case not only shows the complexity of the legal and political relations and the tension between China and foreign countries in modern times, but also reveals the misunderstanding of the Chinese people's understanding of the modernization of the legal system. It suggests that the modernization of legal system in China has a long way to go.
【作者單位】： 四川大學(xué)歷史文化學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：D929;K258
，

本文編號(hào)：1593898