【摘要】：我國目前正處在一個(gè)經(jīng)濟(jì)、社會(huì)快速發(fā)展與變革的重要時(shí)期,同時(shí)也是各類社會(huì)矛盾和社會(huì)問題的凸顯時(shí)期。社會(huì)地位的升降和收入的懸殊都會(huì)引起人們心理的不平衡；人口流動(dòng)、居所變遷、工作崗位變動(dòng)頻率的加快也使城市管理的難度越來越大……這些問題集中表現(xiàn)在社會(huì)的基本單元——社區(qū)中。經(jīng)濟(jì)、社會(huì)的快速發(fā)展將社區(qū)推到了社會(huì)問題的焦點(diǎn)。三十年來,東營市既借鑒外地經(jīng)驗(yàn),又突出地方特色,建立起了與經(jīng)濟(jì)和社會(huì)發(fā)展相適應(yīng)的社區(qū)治理體制和運(yùn)行機(jī)制,成為全國和諧社區(qū)建設(shè)示范城區(qū)。近年來,特別是黨的十八大作出推進(jìn)“城鄉(xiāng)社區(qū)治理”的重大部署以來,東營市認(rèn)真貫徹落實(shí)中央決策精神,以居民需求為導(dǎo)向、以改革創(chuàng)新為動(dòng)力、以實(shí)驗(yàn)試點(diǎn)為載體,圍繞政府治理和社會(huì)自我調(diào)節(jié)、居民自治良性互動(dòng)的改革目標(biāo),在街道管理體制改革、社區(qū)社會(huì)組織培育、微觀治理機(jī)制建構(gòu)等多重層次,社區(qū)治理法治化、社區(qū)協(xié)商制度化、社區(qū)服務(wù)專業(yè)化等多元領(lǐng)域,完善政府購買服務(wù)、引導(dǎo)社會(huì)力量介入、擴(kuò)大居民有序參與等多個(gè)方面進(jìn)行了開創(chuàng)性探索,推動(dòng)社區(qū)治理創(chuàng)新取得了初步成果。本研究以東營市城市社區(qū)為研究對象,以文獻(xiàn)資料法,理清東營城市社區(qū)的發(fā)展歷程、治理體制機(jī)制的變革；以問卷調(diào)查的方法收集研究數(shù)據(jù),并對調(diào)查結(jié)果進(jìn)行認(rèn)真分析、定量研究；以個(gè)案研究法,深入剖析社區(qū)治理方式與創(chuàng)新發(fā)展的經(jīng)驗(yàn),形成系統(tǒng)的整體認(rèn)識(shí)；通過分類與比較,立足本地實(shí)際開展集成創(chuàng)新,在全面梳理不同創(chuàng)新成果適用條件的基礎(chǔ)上,對分屬不同層次、不同領(lǐng)域、不同方面的創(chuàng)新成果加以科學(xué)綜合,形成具有系統(tǒng)性、耦合性和可行性的創(chuàng)新模式。
[Abstract]:At present, China is in an important period of rapid economic and social development and transformation, but also a prominent period of various social contradictions and social problems. The rise and fall of social status and the disparity of income will cause people's psychological imbalance; population mobility, changes of residence, and the acceleration of the frequency of job changes also make urban management more and more difficult. These problems are concentrated in the community, the basic unit of society. The rapid development of economy and society has pushed the community to the focus of social problems. In the past 30 years, Dongying City has established the community governance system and operation mechanism adapted to the economic and social development, and has become a model city for the construction of harmonious communities in the whole country. In recent years, especially since the party's 18th National Congress made major arrangements to promote "urban and rural community governance," Dongying has conscientiously implemented the spirit of central decision-making, guided by residents' needs, taking reform and innovation as its driving force, and taking experimental pilot projects as carriers. Focusing on the reform goals of government governance and social self-regulation, the positive interaction of residents' autonomy, the reform of the street management system, the cultivation of community social organizations, the construction of micro-governance mechanism, the legalization of community governance, the institutionalization of community consultation, etc. Several fields, such as specialization of community service, consummating government purchasing service, guiding social forces to intervene, expanding residents' orderly participation, etc., have carried on pioneering exploration, which has promoted the innovation of community governance and achieved preliminary results. This research takes Dongying city community as the research object, with the method of literature and materials, clarifies the development course of the Dongying city community, the reform of the governance system mechanism, collects the research data by the method of questionnaire, and analyzes the results of the investigation seriously. Quantitative research, case study, in-depth analysis of community governance and innovative development experience, the formation of a system of overall understanding, through classification and comparison, based on the local reality of integrated innovation, On the basis of comprehensively combing the applicable conditions of different innovation achievements, this paper scientifically synthesizes the innovation results belonging to different levels, different fields and different aspects, and forms a systematic, coupling and feasible innovation model.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：D669.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 黃建軍;;從社會(huì)管理到社會(huì)治理的多維困境[J];探索;2014年02期

2 周學(xué)馨;黃小梅;;新型城鎮(zhèn)化進(jìn)程中城市社區(qū)治理研究[J];探索;2014年02期

3 朱勝玉;李鑫;;完善無錫市城市管理體制機(jī)制建議[J];城市管理與科技;2014年01期

4 冷玉威;;社會(huì)主義和諧社會(huì)建設(shè)中加強(qiáng)和改進(jìn)城市社區(qū)黨建的思考[J];湖北經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年03期

5 王權(quán)典;;轉(zhuǎn)型期南海城鄉(xiāng)社區(qū)治理機(jī)制創(chuàng)新路徑探索[J];華中農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年02期

6 張宓;;淺談轉(zhuǎn)型背景下東北老工業(yè)城市社會(huì)管理模式的發(fā)展[J];中國市場;2012年45期

7 龔翔榮;;城市社區(qū)管理體制改革的縱橫路徑探究[J];理論與改革;2012年05期

8 劉志鵬;;城市社區(qū)自治立法:域外比較與借鑒[J];國家行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年03期

9 邱曉里;淦家輝;;北京市城市社區(qū)建設(shè)實(shí)踐與思考[J];中國行政管理;2012年03期

10 盧以品;胡細(xì)妮;;法學(xué)視角下城市社區(qū)治理模式之選擇[J];特區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì);2012年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 鄧艷;我國城市社區(qū)文化建設(shè)創(chuàng)新研究[D];電子科技大學(xué);2013年

2 閆怡;社會(huì)主義和諧社會(huì)視野下的城市社區(qū)建設(shè)問題研究[D];廣西民族大學(xué);2013年

3 彭博;城市社區(qū)建設(shè)中的政府行為研究[D];廣西師范學(xué)院;2012年

4 龐翠;政府管理與城市社區(qū)自治的協(xié)同治理機(jī)制探析[D];中央民族大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號：2160523