再論北周政權(quán)未實(shí)施九品中正制
本文選題:九品中正制 + 選官制度; 參考:《陜西師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版)》2017年05期
【摘要】:雖然《北周六典》《西魏、北周時(shí)期的九品中正制及其作用》等著述中有北周政權(quán)任命過(guò)中正這一九品中正制實(shí)施過(guò)程中最為關(guān)鍵的職官,可是這些記載多出自碑刻等考古材料,其中有的記載時(shí)間有誤,有的時(shí)間不確定,甚至有的碑刻本身真?zhèn)尉痛嬖趩?wèn)題,正如前輩學(xué)者所云:這些碑刻比之傳世文獻(xiàn)來(lái)說(shuō)其史料價(jià)值還是存在一定的差距的。另外,雖然《周書(shū)》《北史》等典籍中存在有關(guān)北周政權(quán)"舉賢良""舉明經(jīng)""舉秀才"的記載,可是由于該政權(quán)統(tǒng)治時(shí)期沒(méi)有任命過(guò)一個(gè)中正這一九品中正制實(shí)施過(guò)程中最為關(guān)鍵的職官,因此北周政權(quán)并沒(méi)有沿用西魏政權(quán)所實(shí)行的九品中正制。至于北周政權(quán)未實(shí)行九品中正制的緣由,除了拙文《北周政權(quán)是否實(shí)行九品中正制》所做的分析之外,還應(yīng)該與北周政權(quán)放棄了漢魏以來(lái)的職官制度而采取周六官制,改九品官制為九命制有關(guān)聯(lián)。
[Abstract]:Although the Northern Saturday Canon, "the Western Wei Dynasty, the Northern Zhou Dynasty's nine-pin-zhongzheng system and its role", and so on, have been appointed by the Northern Zhou regime as the most important official in the process of implementing the nine-pin-zhongzheng system, most of these records come from archaeological materials such as inscriptions on steles and other archaeological materials.Some of them have errors in recording time, some are uncertain, and even some inscriptions have their own true or false problems, as the previous generation of scholars have said: these inscriptions have a certain gap in the value of historical materials compared to their handed down documents.In addition, although "Zhou Shu" and "Northern History" and other classical books, there are records about the Northern Zhou regime's "holding up virtuous" and "holding out the classics" and "extolling the scholar".However, since the regime did not appoint a key official in the process of implementation, the Northern Zhou regime did not follow the Nine-Pin system of the Western Wei Dynasty.As for the reasons why the Northern Zhou regime did not implement the nine-pint system, in addition to the analysis made in my article, "whether the Northern Zhou regime has carried out the nine-pin-zhongzheng system", it should also be followed by the Northern Zhou regime, which has abandoned the official system since the Han and Wei dynasties and adopted the official system on Saturday.It is relevant to change the nine-pint official system to the nine-order system.
【作者單位】: 陜西師范大學(xué)歷史文化學(xué)院;
【基金】:國(guó)家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目“北朝時(shí)期民族認(rèn)同及區(qū)域文化研究”(13BZS086)
【分類號(hào)】:D691.42;K239.25
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 苗懷明;唐代選官制度與中國(guó)古代判詞文體的成熟[J];河南社會(huì)科學(xué);2002年01期
2 程麗云;;簡(jiǎn)析選官制度對(duì)漢代政治的影響[J];商業(yè)文化(學(xué)術(shù)版);2010年05期
3 楊希珍;北魏的中正選官制度[J];山東大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1989年02期
4 于凌;李曉燕;;從“舉賢良”看漢代的選官制度[J];黃河科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2008年02期
5 張榮靖;;從選官制度看唐人入仕之艱[J];時(shí)代文學(xué)(上半月);2011年06期
6 杜文玉;五代選官制度研究[J];中國(guó)史研究;2002年03期
7 張濤;經(jīng)學(xué)與漢代的選官制度[J];史學(xué)月刊;1998年03期
8 李俊娜;;近二十年兩漢選官制度研究綜述[J];黑龍江史志;2012年05期
9 王興亞;;明代選官制度述略[J];黃淮學(xué)刊(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1990年04期
10 仝晰綱;漢代選官制度芻議[J];社會(huì)科學(xué);1999年06期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 曹秀娟;論魏晉士人的爭(zhēng)競(jìng)之風(fēng)[D];南京師范大學(xué);2015年
,本文編號(hào):1761880
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/guojiguanxi/1761880.html