發(fā)布時間：2018-02-04 08:04

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 社會形態(tài) 封建社會 政體類型 帝制中國 專制政體 保育式政體　出處：《文史哲》2017年06期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：帝制中國是封建社會與專制政體,似乎早已成為政治常識。然而,生成于特定的歷史時期的常識難免有其歷史的局限性。帝制中國的"專制政體說"產(chǎn)生于清末,源自外部對中國政體的觀感與指認(rèn),進而被國人所廣泛接受。"專制政體說"經(jīng)由地方性知識到一般性知識的轉(zhuǎn)換,使得帝制中國政體的獨特性被忽略,且難以解釋帝制中國與現(xiàn)代中國的特殊性及接續(xù)性。從地方性知識出發(fā),重新考察帝制中國的政體屬性,"保育式政體說"也許更能反映帝制中國政體的特質(zhì),且有助于擺脫長期以來中國學(xué)術(shù)界"削足適履"的思維習(xí)性。
[Abstract]:The monarchy is Chinese and feudal autocracy, seems to have become a political sense. However, generated in the specific historical period of knowledge inevitably has its historical limitations. China "imperial autocracy" produced in the late Qing Dynasty, from the impressions and identify outside of the Chinese regime, which is accepted by the Chinese people. "Autocracy" through local knowledge conversion to general knowledge, the uniqueness of the imperial China regime is ignored, and it is difficult to explain the particularity of imperial Chinese and modern China and continuity. Starting from the local knowledge, re-examine the regime attribute Chinese monarchy, "said conservation regime" may better reflect the the Chinese regime characteristics, and help to get rid of the thinking habits of long China academic circles "literally".

【作者單位】： 南京大學(xué)政府管理學(xué)院政治學(xué)系;南京大學(xué)亞太發(fā)展研究中心;
【分類號】：D691.2
【正文快照】： 近世以來,關(guān)于帝制中國的社會形態(tài)及政體類型的認(rèn)定,以及中國究屬“普遍”還是“特殊”的爭論由來已久。若延續(xù)帝制時期國人的政治常識,中國與其周邊的藩屬只有文野之別,分別處于文明的高地與洼地。帶著此種認(rèn)知,晚清一些開眼看世界的國人均堅信中國是常識意義上的普遍,西方則，

本文編號：1489766