本文選題：價值 + 倫理��； 參考：《自然辯證法研究》2017年08期

【摘要】：弗洛里迪僅僅以熵量多少來評判善惡的倫理原則是建立在簡單性和單極化思維方式的基礎(chǔ)之上的。如果按照他所制定的對熵的絕對排斥的至善原則來實踐的話,那么,在自然界和生物圈領(lǐng)域只能導(dǎo)致運(yùn)動變化活力的終結(jié),在人的思想和科學(xué)發(fā)展的領(lǐng)域只能導(dǎo)致僵化和停滯,在社會領(lǐng)域則只能導(dǎo)致法西斯式的專制集權(quán)體制。事物的有序化和無序化發(fā)展都是有極限的,熵和熵增并不就是絕對的"惡",信息和熵減也并不就是絕對的"善"。一個合理的倫理原則應(yīng)當(dāng)把諸如信息和熵、有序和無序、整體性和還原性、確定性和非確定性、決定論和非決定論、目的性和隨機(jī)性、必然性和偶然性這些看似對立的因素兼容起來,并在這些相關(guān)對立因素之間保持某種合理的張力。
[Abstract]:Floridian's ethical principle of judging good and evil only by the amount of entropy is based on simplicity and unipolar thinking. If he practices the principle of absolute exclusion of entropy, then in nature and in the biosphere it can only lead to the end of the vitality of movement change, and in the field of human thought and scientific development, it can only lead to rigidity and stagnation. In the social sphere, it can only lead to fascist autocracy. There are limits to the ordered and disordered development of things, entropy and entropy increase is not absolute "evil", information and entropy reduction is not absolute "good". A reasonable ethical principle should include such principles as information and entropy, order and disorder, integrity and reducibility, certainty and uncertainty, determinism and non-determinism, purpose and randomness, Necessity and fortuitousness, which seem to be opposite factors, are compatible and maintain a reasonable tension between them.
【作者單位】： 西安交通大學(xué)人文社會科學(xué)學(xué)院;
【基金】：2013年度國家社會科學(xué)基金重點項目“信息哲學(xué)的基礎(chǔ)理論研究”(13AZD096)
【分類號】：B82-057
，

本文編號：1820401