【摘要】：可得利益是指合同履行后可以獲得的利益，即指合同適當(dāng)履行后可以實現(xiàn)或者取得的財產(chǎn)利益，它是違約損害賠償制度中的重要組成部分。雖然我國《合同法》第113條對可得利益損失應(yīng)當(dāng)予以賠償作出了規(guī)定，，但是由于可得利益損失本身的不確定性和抽象性，以及人民法院對可得利益的認(rèn)定過于謹(jǐn)慎和嚴(yán)格，使得法院對當(dāng)事人提出的可得額利益賠償請求大多難以支持。本文僅針對合合同可得利益的相關(guān)問題作些淺析，以期能在司法實務(wù)操作中有所裨益。第一部分，引入多個合同可得利益賠償?shù)南嚓P(guān)案例，總結(jié)各案例判決書中對合同可得利益賠償?shù)南嗤筒煌�，引出論文所要討論的主題。第二部分，著重分析合同可得利益的表現(xiàn)形式。分清合同可得利益的表現(xiàn)形式是正確處理違約可得利益賠償案件的前提之一。第三部分，主要對合同可得利益的一般認(rèn)定規(guī)則中的可預(yù)見性規(guī)則及確定性規(guī)則進(jìn)行深度分析，再通過比較中國與他國在合同可得利益實際處理規(guī)則上的不同，揭示我國司法操作及立法上的不足，以及我國應(yīng)當(dāng)學(xué)習(xí)借鑒他國之處。第四部分，主要論述可得利益損失的范圍、可得利益損失的計算標(biāo)準(zhǔn)及計算方法。
[Abstract]:The available interest refers to the benefits that can be obtained after the performance of the contract, that is, the property interests that can be realized or obtained after the proper performance of the contract, and it is an important part of the system of compensation for damages for breach of contract. Although Article 113 of contract Law of our country stipulates that the loss of available interests should be compensated, due to the uncertainty and abstractness of the loss of available interests, and because of the people's court's too cautious and strict recognition of the available interests, This makes it difficult for the court to support the claims for the available benefits of the parties. In this paper, the author makes a brief analysis on the relevant problems of the benefit of contract in order to be of benefit in the practice of judicial practice. In the first part, the author introduces several relevant cases of contract interest compensation, summarizes the similarities and differences of the contract interest compensation in each case judgment, and leads to the topic to be discussed in this paper. The second part focuses on the analysis of the form of contract interest. It is one of the prerequisites to correctly deal with the cases of compensation for the benefits of breach of contract. The third part mainly analyzes the predictability rules and deterministic rules in the general rules of determining the benefits of contracts, and then compares the differences between China and other countries in the actual rules of dealing with the benefits available under contracts. This paper reveals the shortcomings of our judicial operation and legislation, and points out that our country should learn from other countries. The fourth part mainly discusses the scope of the loss of available benefits, the calculation standard and calculation method of the loss of available benefits.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 李成林;;論合同責(zé)任中的所失利益[J];法學(xué)研究;1993年06期

2 韓德培,韓鐵;美國資本主義經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展中的契約自由與合同法[J];武漢大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2003年06期

3 陳潔;美國違約救濟(jì)中的期待利益保護(hù)及其限制[J];國家檢察官學(xué)院學(xué)報;2004年03期

本文編號：2139399