本文選題：唯物史觀 + 生產(chǎn)史　； 參考：《學術交流》2017年10期

【摘要】：對反映社會形態(tài)更替的一般歷史規(guī)律,和引導人類實踐活動的總體文化結構,分別予以檢視,構成了解讀馬克思唯物史觀的宏觀理論依據(jù)與微觀邏輯前提。這就要求我們在狹義的"物質生產(chǎn)史"棱鏡中,把握廣義的"文明發(fā)展史"進程。這當中,涉及三個主要問題:第一,"生產(chǎn)力-生產(chǎn)關系"的辯證運動,何以折射出歷史的全部文化圖景?第二,構成人類文明基底的文化傳統(tǒng),怎樣在生產(chǎn)范式的更迭中保持長時段的延續(xù)?第三,應該如何理解以物質生產(chǎn)為座架的政治-經(jīng)濟革命和以變革社會整體文化精神為旨趣的文化革命這二者之間的統(tǒng)一關系?事實上,這是剛性的物質生產(chǎn)邏輯與彈性的文化記憶譜系這二者彼此間博弈和融合的理論兩難。它們揭示了馬克思唯物史觀在顯性的"生產(chǎn)-政治革命"和隱性的"交往-文化變遷"以及更為深刻的"記憶-精神演繹"這三個層次上的辯證統(tǒng)一。而"生產(chǎn)史-文化史-記憶史"的共軛結構,將促使歷史唯物主義的解讀范式向宏大的"精神史"領域躍遷。后者作為保存人類所有文明成果的記憶之場,乃是馬克思社會批判理論得以展開的基底。憑借對人類全部精神結晶的總體性反思,馬克思唯物史觀的理論范式將發(fā)生文化-記憶學轉向。
[Abstract]:The general historical law reflecting the change of social form and the overall cultural structure of guiding human practical activities are examined separately, which constitutes the macroscopic theoretical basis and microcosmic logical premise for interpreting Marx's historical materialism. This requires us to grasp the broad process of the history of civilization in the narrow sense of "history of material production" prism. There are three main questions involved: first, how does the dialectical movement of "productivity-production relations" reflect the whole cultural picture of history? Second, the cultural tradition that forms the basis of human civilization, how to maintain a long-term continuity in the change of production paradigm? Third, how should we understand the unified relationship between the political-economic revolution based on material production and the cultural revolution which aims at changing the cultural spirit of the whole society? In fact, this is a theoretical dilemma between rigid material production logic and elastic cultural memory pedigree. They reveal the dialectical unity of Marx's historical materialism on the three levels of explicit "production-political revolution", recessive "community-cultural change" and more profound "memory-spiritual deduction". The conjugate structure of "production history-culture history-memory history" will make the interpretation paradigm of historical materialism change to the grand field of "spiritual history". The latter, as the memory field of preserving all the achievements of human civilization, is the base of Marx's theory of social criticism. With the overall reflection on the spiritual crystallization of human beings, the theoretical paradigm of Marx's historical materialism will turn from culture to memory.
【作者單位】： 南京大學馬克思主義學院;
【基金】：國家社科基金項目“大衛(wèi)·哈維馬克思主義空間政治哲學思想研究”(17FZX036)
【分類號】：B03

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前2條

1 李振綱;一位現(xiàn)代儒家的文化尋根意識——梁漱溟的東西文化比較研究評析[J];河北學刊;1990年06期

2 馬健芳;曾鷹;;從批判向度反思科技文化的焦慮[J];求索;2009年03期

，

本文編號：1993286