發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-02-27 16:47

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 安倍晉三 二戰(zhàn)史觀 修正主義 “慰安婦”　出處：《上海師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：歷史觀是世界觀的一部分,因此對(duì)個(gè)人的社會(huì)實(shí)踐具有指導(dǎo)作用。安倍晉三作為日本首相,其二戰(zhàn)史觀是日本內(nèi)閣在歷史問題上決策的重要依據(jù),對(duì)于預(yù)估中日關(guān)系的未來(lái)走向具有重要意義。同時(shí),安倍晉三的二戰(zhàn)史觀也是日本社會(huì)戰(zhàn)后二戰(zhàn)史觀的縮影,反映了日本政府的對(duì)華戰(zhàn)略,所以有助于我國(guó)制定對(duì)日政策,切實(shí)維護(hù)我國(guó)國(guó)家利益。國(guó)內(nèi)學(xué)者對(duì)該問題的研究散亂而不系統(tǒng),定性過量而系統(tǒng)研究不足,情境和比較分析較少。本文系統(tǒng)分析了安倍晉三的二戰(zhàn)史觀。第一章討論并歸納了安倍晉三的二戰(zhàn)史觀,比較和定量分析了安倍晉三二戰(zhàn)史觀的特質(zhì)、影響;第二章綜合探討了安倍晉三二戰(zhàn)史觀的成因;第三章以當(dāng)今安倍晉三政府在“慰安婦”問題上的態(tài)度為例,得出如下結(jié)論:安倍晉三的二戰(zhàn)史觀是“習(xí)得性”的,是歷史修正主義的“集大成者”,這是日本當(dāng)前政治經(jīng)濟(jì)環(huán)境、岸信介政治、黨派文化、政治伙伴、右翼團(tuán)體、美國(guó)因素等客觀因素和安倍晉三個(gè)人“修憲目標(biāo)”、保持長(zhǎng)期政權(quán)、對(duì)沖中國(guó)崛起等主觀動(dòng)機(jī)共同作用的結(jié)果。與戰(zhàn)后歷屆首相相比,安倍晉三的二戰(zhàn)史觀并不是“最激進(jìn)的”,但確實(shí)是“最全面向右的”,尤其是在“慰安婦”問題上,安倍晉三試圖完全否定日本政府在戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)中強(qiáng)征婦女的犯罪事實(shí)和法律責(zé)任,遭到了國(guó)際社會(huì)的共同譴責(zé)。日韓“慰安婦”協(xié)議雖然達(dá)成,但事實(shí)上是美國(guó)主導(dǎo)樸槿惠政權(quán)施壓下的日韓政府間妥協(xié)的產(chǎn)物。結(jié)語(yǔ)部分,以安倍晉三訪問珍珠港發(fā)表的演講為例子,作者認(rèn)為選擇性的建構(gòu)二戰(zhàn)歷史是其修正主義二戰(zhàn)史觀的又一特征,根源在于安倍晉三錯(cuò)誤的對(duì)華認(rèn)識(shí),并對(duì)安倍晉三保守主義二戰(zhàn)史觀對(duì)中國(guó)乃至東北亞和平帶來(lái)的沖擊,提了一點(diǎn)建議。
[Abstract]:The view of history is part of the world view and therefore has a guiding role in the social practice of the individual. As Japan's prime minister, Shinzo Abe's view of history in World War II is an important basis for Japan's cabinet to make decisions on historical issues. It is of great significance to predict the future direction of Sino-Japanese relations. At the same time, Shinzo Abe's view of the history of World War II is also a microcosm of Japanese society's view of the history of the second World War, reflecting the Japanese government's strategy towards China, so it is helpful for China to formulate its policy towards Japan. Protect the national interests of our country conscientiously. The research on this issue by domestic scholars is scattered and not systematic, and the qualitative excessive but the systematic research is insufficient. The first chapter discusses and summarizes Abe's historical view of World War II, compares and quantifies the characteristics and influence of Abe's view of World War II; The second chapter comprehensively discusses the causes of Abe's historical view of World War II, the third chapter takes the attitude of the Abe government on the issue of "comfort women" as an example, and draws the following conclusion: Abe's historical view of World War II is "learned." This is the current political and economic environment in Japan, Kishi Nobusuke's politics, party culture, political partners, right-wing groups, American factors and other objective factors, as well as Abe's personal "constitutional revision objectives," to maintain long-term political power. Hedge against the combined effects of subjective motives such as the rise of China. Compared with all postwar prime ministers, Abe's historical view of World War II is not "the most radical", but it is indeed "the most comprehensive to the right", especially on the issue of "comfort women." Shinzo Abe's attempt to completely negate the criminal facts and legal responsibility of the Japanese government for forcibly recruiting women in the war has been condemned by the international community. Although the Japan-ROK "comfort women" agreement was reached, But in fact it was the product of a compromise between the Japanese and South Korean governments under the pressure of the United States to dominate Park Geun-hye 's regime. In the concluding remarks, take the speech delivered by Abe Abe during his visit to Pearl Harbor as an example. The author holds that the selective construction of the history of World War II is another characteristic of his revisionist view of World War II history, which is rooted in Abe's wrong understanding of China and the impact of his conservative view of World War II history on China and peace in Northeast Asia. A little suggestion was made.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D731.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 晉林波;;日韓“冷戰(zhàn)”的原因與影響[J];國(guó)際問題研究;2015年06期

2 喬林生;;“安倍歷史觀”的特征及其影響[J];世界歷史;2015年04期

3 張碧波;;在歷史觀問題上日本安倍政府向世界人民宣戰(zhàn)——評(píng)《大東亞戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)的總結(jié)》[J];奮斗;2015年07期

4 星野富一;于振沖;;安倍晉三參拜靖國(guó)神社的影響與日本的歷史認(rèn)識(shí)問題[J];日本研究;2014年03期

5 蔡亮;;安倍內(nèi)閣“積極和平主義”的三重特性評(píng)析[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)與政治論壇;2014年05期

6 羅歡欣;;琉球問題所涉“剩余主權(quán)”論的歷史與法律考察[J];日本學(xué)刊;2014年04期

7 呂耀東;;論日本政治右傾化的民族主義特質(zhì)[J];日本學(xué)刊;2014年03期

8 李寒梅;;日本新民族主義的基本形態(tài)及其成因[J];外交評(píng)論(外交學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2013年01期

9 管建強(qiáng);;國(guó)際法視角下的中日釣魚島領(lǐng)土主權(quán)紛爭(zhēng)[J];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué);2012年12期

10 劉江永;;日本政治思潮演變對(duì)中日關(guān)系的影響[J];亞非縱橫;2007年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 王一飛;德國(guó)與日本對(duì)二戰(zhàn)史認(rèn)識(shí)的比較研究[D];外交學(xué)院;2014年

2 朱曉琳;德日二戰(zhàn)歷史教育比較研究[D];青島科技大學(xué);2014年

3 徐阜杰;安倍與日本保守主義政治[D];上海國(guó)際問題研究院;2014年

，

本文編號(hào)：1543503