本文關(guān)鍵詞：我國(guó)死緩制度研究　出處：《河北大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 死緩 適用條件 立法缺陷 立法建議

【摘要】：死緩是指對(duì)于應(yīng)當(dāng)判處死刑的犯罪分子，如果不是必須立即執(zhí)行的，可以在判處死刑的同時(shí)宣告緩期二年執(zhí)行的一種死刑的特殊執(zhí)行制度。死緩制度是中國(guó)的獨(dú)創(chuàng)，，中國(guó)緩刑制度從性質(zhì)上講是緩刑的一種。它作為一項(xiàng)重要的刑事法律制度，其合理存在所具有的社會(huì)基礎(chǔ)主要表現(xiàn)在政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、文化三方面。適用死緩有利于貫徹寬嚴(yán)相濟(jì)的刑事政策；有利于實(shí)現(xiàn)雙重刑罰目的；有利于維護(hù)法律的公平正義，保障人權(quán)。 根據(jù)刑法的規(guī)定，適用死緩的條件是，應(yīng)當(dāng)判處死刑的犯罪分子，不是必須立即執(zhí)行。對(duì)被判處死刑緩期執(zhí)行的罪犯的減刑，由罪犯服刑地的高級(jí)人民法院根據(jù)同級(jí)監(jiān)獄管理機(jī)關(guān)審核同意的減刑建議書裁定。被適用死緩的犯罪分子因其在緩期二年執(zhí)行期間的表現(xiàn)不同而有不同的結(jié)果，或者立即執(zhí)行死刑，或者減為無期徒刑或有期徒刑�！缎谭ㄐ拚浮罚ò耍┮�(guī)定了死緩限制減刑制度，緩解了我國(guó)刑罰體系“死刑偏重、生刑偏輕”的現(xiàn)象。適用死緩限制減刑制度要堅(jiān)持罪刑法定原則、罪責(zé)刑相適應(yīng)原則、堅(jiān)持有利于貫徹死刑政策的原則。死緩限制減刑適用范圍包括三種情況：對(duì)判處死刑緩期執(zhí)行的累犯的限制減刑；對(duì)因七種具體犯罪被判處死刑緩期執(zhí)行罪犯的限制減刑；對(duì)犯有組織的暴力性犯罪被判處死緩的罪犯限制減刑。 盡管《刑法修正案》（八）對(duì)死緩制度作了修改，我國(guó)的死緩制度仍然存在一些問題。比如，死緩適用條件模糊；死緩變更為死刑立即執(zhí)行的條件太寬泛；死緩考驗(yàn)期不合理；對(duì)無故意犯罪但有一般立功表現(xiàn)的處理不合理。所以，我國(guó)刑法應(yīng)當(dāng)進(jìn)一步明確死緩的適用條件，對(duì)于死緩變更為死刑立即執(zhí)行的條件改為死緩期間故意犯罪被判處五年以上有期徒刑的；延長(zhǎng)死緩考驗(yàn)期；區(qū)分死緩期間有一般立功與既無故意犯罪又無立功情節(jié)的處理等。
[Abstract]:Reprieve refers to the criminals should be sentenced to death, if immediate execution is not essential, special enforcement system may declare a death penalty suspended for two years and at the same time sentenced to death. China reprieve is original, China probation system in essence is a kind of slow punishment. It is one of the most important the criminal legal system, its reasonable existence social foundation has manifested in political, economic and cultural three aspects. For the reprieve to implement the criminal policy of combining punishment with leniency; is conducive to the realization of the dual purpose of punishment; to maintain fairness and justice, the legal protection of human rights.
According to the provisions of the criminal law, for reprieve condition is that the criminals should be sentenced to death, not to be executed immediately. Is sentenced to death penalty reprieve commutation by criminals, senior people's court according to agreed to the same level of prison management authority audit commutation proposal ruling. Criminals who are applicable for the reprieve for his performance in during the two years suspended has a different result, or executed immediately, or reduced to life imprisonment or imprisonment. Criminal law amendment (eight) "the provisions of the reprieve commutation limit system, alleviate the death penalty system in our country on the lighter punishment, students" phenomenon. For reprieve limit the commutation system should adhere to the principle of legality, the principle of suiting punishment, insist to implement the principles of the policy. The death penalty reprieve commutation limit scope includes three kinds of situations: the death sentence suspended The limit commutation of recidivist; to limit the commutation by seven specific crimes were sentenced to death suspended criminals; to limit the commutation of organized violence crime criminals were sentenced to death.
Although the "criminal law amendment" (eight) the reprieve system has been modified, the reprieve system there are still some problems. For example, the applicable conditions of reprieve fuzzy; its change for immediate execution of death penalty is too broad; probation period is not reasonable; for no intentional crime but generally meritorious treatment is not reasonable. Therefore, the criminal law of our country should further clarify the applicable conditions of reprieve, for its change to immediate execution of death penalty conditions to reprieve during intentional crime was sentenced to five years imprisonment; extend the probation period; distinguish between death with common meritorious service and neither intentional crime nor meritorious treatment.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924.12

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 黃云波;;死緩制度新論——以限制死刑為視角[J];濱州職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年01期

2 邵偉;;死刑存廢的法與經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析[J];法制與社會(huì);2007年08期

3 曹永志;;死緩制度問題研究[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年02期

4 孫雅寧;;死刑改革的先聲:淺談我國(guó)死緩制度的價(jià)值與完善[J];法制與社會(huì);2012年05期

5 李森;;中國(guó)死緩制度之探析[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2013年02期

6 陳興良;;死刑適用的司法控制——以首批刑事指導(dǎo)案例為視角[J];法學(xué);2013年02期

7 楊勇;死緩本質(zhì)新探——從死緩規(guī)定本身的法理邏輯矛盾談起[J];中北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社科版);2005年01期

8 沈丹萱;;死緩制度中的期限問題淺析[J];湖南公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2008年03期

9 黃京平,石磊;論死刑緩期執(zhí)行變更為死刑立即執(zhí)行若干問題[J];河南社會(huì)科學(xué);2003年04期

10 江獻(xiàn)軍;周瑞霞;;論死緩制度的理論基礎(chǔ)與司法適用[J];河南教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年05期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 劉佳;死緩限制減刑制度研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2013年

本文編號(hào)：1396507