本文選題：公共租賃住房 + 空間失配　； 參考：《華中科技大學(xué)》2016年博士論文

【摘要】：住房保障是關(guān)系社會(huì)和諧穩(wěn)定的民生問(wèn)題。作為我國(guó)住房保障制度新階段,公共租賃住房已經(jīng)是新建保障性住房的主要形式,其建設(shè)規(guī)模、時(shí)間安排、選址布局、分配使用和后續(xù)管理是住房保障政策的重要內(nèi)容。公共租賃住房政策所取得成績(jī)雖有目共睹,然政策實(shí)施過(guò)程中出現(xiàn)的問(wèn)題也不容忽視,不僅在選址和建設(shè)上頻頻出現(xiàn)選址偏遠(yuǎn)、進(jìn)度緩慢和質(zhì)量低下等問(wèn)題,在配租和使用上出現(xiàn)的棄租問(wèn)題也日趨嚴(yán)重。科學(xué)理解及有效解決上述問(wèn)題是住房保障政策的當(dāng)務(wù)之急。空間區(qū)位是影響住房?jī)r(jià)值的關(guān)鍵因素。公共租賃住房區(qū)位狀況對(duì)其居民的居住、就業(yè)及通勤帶來(lái)的改變,會(huì)影響公共租賃住房的使用效率及保障水平。本文從空間分布視角對(duì)公共租賃住房進(jìn)行分析�；诳臻g失配理論、住房效用理論及可行能力理論,應(yīng)用實(shí)地調(diào)研所得翔實(shí)數(shù)據(jù),綜合采用定性及定量方法,對(duì)公共租賃住房空間失配進(jìn)行全方位分析。全文共分八章。第一章是緒論,包括研究問(wèn)題提出、國(guó)內(nèi)外文獻(xiàn)梳理及研究設(shè)計(jì)。第二章是公共租賃住房空間失配理論分析,包括公共租賃住房空間失配的理論論證、內(nèi)涵界定與表征分析。第三章是問(wèn)卷調(diào)查與描述性分析,包括調(diào)研過(guò)程描繪和應(yīng)用統(tǒng)計(jì)方法對(duì)調(diào)研樣本相關(guān)指標(biāo)的全方位描述。第四章是空間失配水平的測(cè)度,應(yīng)用職住平衡度、工作可及性、通勤時(shí)間尺度和通勤空間尺度進(jìn)行測(cè)度。第五章是住房福利影響分析,包括從個(gè)體住房福利角度,對(duì)公共租賃住房空間失配可能導(dǎo)致的影響進(jìn)行分析。第六章是形成機(jī)理梳理,包括從政府、市場(chǎng)和個(gè)體等主體維度,對(duì)形成公共租賃住房空間失配形成的因素及作用機(jī)理探究。第七章是矯正路徑探討,提出矯正公共租賃住房空間失配的可行路徑。第八章是結(jié)論。通過(guò)上述系統(tǒng)的研究,本文得到了如下研究結(jié)論：(1)公共租賃住房空間失配存在。依照竟租理論、住房效用理論和可行能力理論,如果公共租賃住房選址超出空間臨界區(qū)位,額外增加的通勤費(fèi)用將超過(guò)可能獲取的住房收益,居民入住將面臨效益受損,從而處于空間失配的狀態(tài)。實(shí)證數(shù)據(jù)表明,居民入住公共租賃住房的行為顯著惡化了居民的就業(yè)狀況及通勤狀況。從通勤時(shí)間指標(biāo)看,84.4%的居民通勤時(shí)間超過(guò)“可接受通勤時(shí)間”。從通勤空間指標(biāo)看,超過(guò)63.6%的居民的通勤距離超過(guò)合理通勤尺度。從居民住房福利變化看,接近50%家庭通勤成本增加超過(guò)住房支出減少,住房福利受損。依照公共租賃住房空間失配的相關(guān)內(nèi)涵及界定,所選公共租賃住房樣本區(qū)存在空間失配。(2)公共租賃住房空間失配影響和弱化個(gè)體住房福利改善。首先,住房支出節(jié)省不顯著,住房支出水平得到改善幅度非常小,且部分群體存在住房支出水平增加。其次,通勤狀況顯著惡化。入住公共租賃住房帶來(lái)居民通勤支出大幅增加,且從通勤方式、通勤時(shí)間和通勤距離等各方面呈現(xiàn)。綜合考慮住房成本和通勤成本,公共租賃住房空間失配顯著弱化了居民住房福利改善水平。同時(shí),個(gè)體所具備的不同屬性對(duì)住房福利改善的可能性及大小存在不同影響。(3)公共租賃住房空間失配形成機(jī)理復(fù)雜。政府、市場(chǎng)(企業(yè)及利益相關(guān)者)和個(gè)體(居民)三大主體基于不同機(jī)制,通過(guò)住房市場(chǎng)和就業(yè)市場(chǎng)對(duì)公共租賃住房空間失配形成施加影響。政府郊區(qū)化政策、保障性住房政策、職住平衡政策及公共交通政策等政策存在的偏差,直接影響公共租賃住房區(qū)位選址,進(jìn)而影響其居民的居住、就業(yè)和通勤狀況,成為形成公共租賃住房空間失配的直接動(dòng)力。市場(chǎng)主體的行為形成和固化了城市居住空間形態(tài)和就業(yè)空間形態(tài),使公共租賃住房居民面臨擇居與擇業(yè)的兩難選擇,進(jìn)一步惡化其居民的職住與通勤狀況,是公共租賃住房空間失配形成的重要推動(dòng)力。在政策和市場(chǎng)機(jī)制的共同作用下,個(gè)體對(duì)居住區(qū)位、就業(yè)區(qū)位及通勤方式進(jìn)行選擇,最終形成公共租賃住房空間失配。(4)矯正和解決公共租賃住房空間失配的可行路徑。第一、從選址角度,遵循綜合性、系統(tǒng)性、協(xié)調(diào)性和匹配性的原則,依照多樣性目標(biāo)進(jìn)行選址。選址策略注重區(qū)域平衡以及居住梯度融合,在選址評(píng)價(jià)注重全面考慮評(píng)價(jià)因素和科學(xué)選取評(píng)價(jià)方法。第二、從營(yíng)建角度,應(yīng)采用混合居住模式和TOD導(dǎo)向模式,注重建設(shè)激勵(lì)機(jī)制和信息獲取機(jī)制優(yōu)化。第三、從居民通勤及就業(yè)角度,注重改善公共租賃住房住區(qū)產(chǎn)業(yè)分布及公共交通設(shè)施配備狀況,實(shí)現(xiàn)公共租賃住房居民的就近就業(yè)與居住。
[Abstract]:Housing security is the livelihood issues of harmonious and stable society. As the new stage of China's housing security system, public rental housing is the main form of new guaranteed housing. Its construction scale, time arrangement, location layout, distribution and use and follow-up management are important contents of housing security policy. Public rental housing policy has been obtained. Although the results are obvious, the problems arising in the implementation of the policy can not be ignored, not only in the location and construction of the frequent site selection, slow progress and low quality, and so on. The problem of rent and use of rent and use is becoming more and more serious. Scientific understanding and effective solution of the above problems are the top priority of the housing security policy. The spatial location is the key factor affecting the housing value. The change of the public rental housing location on the residents' residence, employment and commuter will affect the efficiency and the level of the public rental housing. This paper analyzes the public rental housing from the spatial distribution perspective. Based on the space mismatch theory, the theory of housing utility and the housing utility theory, The feasible ability theory, the full and accurate data obtained from the field investigation and comprehensive use of qualitative and quantitative methods, the comprehensive analysis of the spatial mismatch of public rental housing. The full text is divided into eight chapters. The first chapter is the introduction, including the research issues, the domestic and foreign literature combing and the research and design. The second chapter is the theoretical analysis of the spatial mismatch of the public rental housing. The third chapter is the comprehensive description of the questionnaire survey and the descriptive analysis, including the investigation process depiction and the application of statistical methods on the comprehensive description of the related indicators of the sample. The fourth chapter is the measure of the spatial mismatch level, the application of employment balance, work accessibility, commuter The fifth chapter is the analysis of the impact of housing welfare, including from the perspective of individual housing welfare, the possible impact of public rental housing space mismatch. The sixth chapter is the formation mechanism, including the main dimensions of the government, the market and the individual, to form the public rental housing space loss. The seventh chapter is the discussion of the factors and the mechanism of action. The eighth chapter is the conclusion. Through the study of the above system, the following conclusions are obtained: (1) the spatial mismatch exists in the public rental housing. According to the theory of rent rent, the theory of housing utility and the feasibility are feasible. The ability theory, if the location of the public rental housing is beyond the critical location of the space, the additional commuter costs will exceed the possible housing benefits, and the residents will be in a state of space mismatch. The empirical data shows that the behavior of residents living in public rental housing significantly worsens the employment status of the residents and In view of the commuter time index, 84.4% of the residents' commuter time exceeded the "acceptable commuter time". From the commuter space index, more than 63.6% of the residents' commuter distance exceeded the reasonable commuter scale. From the change of housing welfare, the cost of the close to 50% families was increased more than the housing expenditure, and the housing welfare was damaged. The related connotation and definition of public rental housing space mismatch, the selected public rental housing sample area exists space mismatch. (2) public rental housing space mismatch influence and weaken individual housing welfare improvement. First, housing expenditure is not significant, housing expenditure level is very small, and some groups have housing expenditure water. Second, the status of commuting deteriorated significantly. Public rental housing brought a significant increase in commuter expenditure, and from commuter mode, commuter time and commuter distance. Comprehensive consideration of housing cost and commuter cost, public rental housing space mismatch significantly weakened the improvement level of residents' housing welfare. Different attributes have different effects on the possibility and size of housing welfare improvement. (3) the formation mechanism of public rental housing space mismatch is complex. The government, market (enterprise and stakeholder) and individual (resident) three main bodies are based on different mechanisms to form the spatial mismatch of public rental housing through the housing market and the employment market. The policy of the suburbanization of the government, the policy of affordable housing, the policy of balance and the policy of public transportation, have a direct influence on the location of the public rental housing, and then affect the residents' residence, employment and commuter, and become the direct motive force to form the space mismatch of the public rental housing. The behavior of the market body is formed. And solidify the form of urban residential space and the form of employment space, make public rental housing residents face the dilemma of choosing and choosing jobs, further worsening their residents' living and commuting status, which is an important driving force for the formation of space mismatch in public rental housing. Under the joint action of policy and market mechanism, the individual is to the residential location, The selection of industry location and commuter mode will eventually form the spatial mismatch of public rental housing. (4) the feasible path to correct and solve the spatial mismatch of public rental housing. First, from the location point of view, we follow the principles of comprehensive, systematic, coordination and matching, and select the location according to the diversity goal. The location strategy focuses on regional balance and residence. In the location evaluation, we should pay attention to the comprehensive consideration of evaluation factors and scientific selection methods. Second, from the point of view of construction, we should adopt the mixed residence mode and TOD oriented model, pay attention to the construction of incentive mechanism and information acquisition mechanism. Third, from the commuting and employment angle of the residents, we should pay more attention to the improvement of the distribution of the public rental housing industry and the distribution of the residential housing industry. The public transport facilities are equipped to achieve the nearest employment and residence of public rental housing residents.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號(hào)】：F299.23
，

本文編號(hào)：2081238