本文選題：證券市場內(nèi)幕交易 + 民事賠償��； 參考：《安徽大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：中國證券市場誕生于上個(gè)世紀(jì)90年代初期。在這20多年的發(fā)展歷程中,它不僅在我國國有企業(yè)的改革與轉(zhuǎn)型中扮演著催化劑的角色,而且還為廣大中小企業(yè)籌集了大量寶貴的資金,為一批優(yōu)秀的民營企業(yè)建立起了平臺(tái),推動(dòng)著它們邁向世界的舞臺(tái)。同時(shí)證券市場的健康發(fā)展也為廣大投資者增加了財(cái)產(chǎn)性收入,提高了他們的物質(zhì)生活水平。但是它的發(fā)展并不是一帆風(fēng)順的,這兩年證券市場內(nèi)幕交易犯罪案件的發(fā)生呈井噴趨勢(shì)。這些案件不僅嚴(yán)重威脅到了證券市場的秩序,還重創(chuàng)了投資者的信心�？v觀資本發(fā)展的歷史,每個(gè)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)達(dá)的國家都必須具備成熟的證券市場。而一個(gè)成熟的證券市場的標(biāo)志并不是意味著具有大量富可敵國的上市企業(yè),也不是那些可以不斷推出金融產(chǎn)品的投資機(jī)構(gòu)或者是腰纏萬貫的投資者,而是具有一個(gè)公平正義的法律制度。這種法律制度可以孵化出像微軟、蘋果、沃爾瑪?shù)嚷劽麅?nèi)外的跨國企業(yè),也可以誕生像索羅斯、巴菲特等一系列的投資大師,更會(huì)將那些企圖通過內(nèi)幕交易等違法手段來獲取暴利的人們繩之于法,進(jìn)而充分保障廣大市場參與者的救濟(jì)權(quán)利。因此,我國目前迫切需要建立起完善的證券內(nèi)幕交易民事賠償制度來打擊內(nèi)幕交易不法行為,為廣大投資者建立起良好的投資環(huán)境,切實(shí)維護(hù)證券市場的公平與穩(wěn)定從而推動(dòng)我國實(shí)體經(jīng)濟(jì)有好又快的發(fā)展。而該制度內(nèi)容涉及到程序法及實(shí)體法上的諸多方面,因此文章以三個(gè)部分對(duì)它的完善加以分析和研究。 首先對(duì)證券市場內(nèi)幕交易民事賠償制度的基本理論進(jìn)行分析,討論其特征及危害性并對(duì)內(nèi)幕交易民事賠償?shù)幕A(chǔ)概念加以闡述,分析內(nèi)幕交易民事賠償中侵權(quán)責(zé)任的法律性質(zhì)及其構(gòu)成要件的特殊性,提出完善賠償制度的重要意義。其次論述了我國證券市場內(nèi)幕交易民事賠償制度存在的缺陷。主要通過對(duì)目前我國內(nèi)幕民事賠償制度在程序法存在前置程序、訴訟模式、訴訟時(shí)效以及管轄范圍這四個(gè)問題進(jìn)行分析,以及實(shí)體上存在損害賠償權(quán)利人的確認(rèn)范圍和內(nèi)幕交易民事責(zé)任的內(nèi)容規(guī)定不完善這兩個(gè)方面進(jìn)行分析。最后在借鑒國外先進(jìn)經(jīng)驗(yàn)的基礎(chǔ)上提出了完善我國證券內(nèi)幕交易民事賠償制度的建議。從取消前置程序到建立集團(tuán)訴訟模式、從訴訟時(shí)效到管轄范圍提出了建議,以促進(jìn)民事賠償制度在程序法上的全面完善。而在實(shí)體上的完善則一方面應(yīng)該規(guī)定內(nèi)幕交易賠償請(qǐng)求權(quán)利人的范圍；另一方面要完善內(nèi)幕交易民事責(zé)任的內(nèi)容規(guī)定。
[Abstract]:China's securities market was born in the early 1990s. In the course of more than 20 years' development, it has not only played a catalytic role in the reform and transformation of state-owned enterprises, but also raised a large number of valuable funds for the majority of small and medium-sized enterprises, and set up a platform for a number of outstanding private enterprises. Push them to the world stage. At the same time, the healthy development of the securities market also increases the property income for the majority of investors, and improves their material living standard. But its development is not smooth, these two years the securities market insider trading crime case occurrence to present the blowout tendency. These cases not only seriously threaten the order of the securities market, but also hit the confidence of investors. Throughout the history of capital development, every developed country must have a mature securities market. The mark of a mature securities market does not mean that there are a large number of listed companies that are rich and competitive, nor are they investment institutions that can continuously launch financial products or investors with a wealth of money. It has a fair and just legal system. This kind of legal system can incubate multinational enterprises such as Microsoft, Apple, Wal-Mart and so on, and can also give birth to a series of investment masters such as Soros, Buffett and so on. Those who try to obtain profiteering through insider trading and other illegal means will be brought to justice, thus fully protecting the rights of the broad market participants. Therefore, at present, China urgently needs to establish a perfect civil compensation system for securities insider trading to crack down on illegal activities of insider trading, so as to establish a good investment environment for the majority of investors. To maintain the equity and stability of the securities market and promote the development of our real economy. The content of this system involves many aspects of procedural law and substantive law, so the article analyzes and studies its perfection in three parts. First of all, it analyzes the basic theory of civil compensation system of insider trading in securities market, discusses its characteristics and harmfulness, and expounds the basic concept of civil compensation for insider trading. This paper analyzes the legal nature of tort liability in civil compensation for insider trading and the particularity of its constituent elements, and puts forward the important significance of perfecting the compensation system. Secondly, it discusses the defects of the civil compensation system of insider trading in China's securities market. Mainly through the analysis of four problems existing in the present civil compensation system of our country, such as pre-procedure, mode of litigation, limitation of action and scope of jurisdiction, It also analyzes the scope of confirmation of the obligee of damages and the imperfection of the content of the civil liability of insider trading. Finally, on the basis of drawing lessons from foreign advanced experience, the paper puts forward some suggestions to perfect the civil compensation system of securities insider trading in our country. From canceling the pre-procedure to establishing the model of group action and from the limitation of action to the scope of jurisdiction, this paper puts forward some suggestions in order to promote the comprehensive perfection of the civil compensation system in procedural law. On the other hand, on the one hand, the scope of insider trading claims for compensation should be defined; on the other hand, the content of insider trading civil liability should be improved.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：安徽大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D922.287;D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 吳澤勇;;群體性糾紛解決機(jī)制的建構(gòu)原理[J];法學(xué)家;2010年05期

2 葛方林;丁立夫;;簡論我國內(nèi)幕交易民事賠償制度[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年28期

3 沈麗;;證券民事賠償訴訟難的現(xiàn)狀及對(duì)策[J];南方金融;2010年05期

4 束景明;;談《證券法》中證券內(nèi)幕交易行為主體界定問題[J];商業(yè)時(shí)代;2008年14期

5 主力軍;;歐盟禁止內(nèi)幕交易制度的立法實(shí)踐及啟示[J];政治與法律;2009年05期

6 萬政偉;;淺析我國證券市場虛假陳述民事責(zé)任及其完善[J];中國證券期貨;2012年04期

7 武俊橋;;2010年中國證券市場法治述評(píng)[J];證券法苑;2011年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：2062168