本文選題：保障性住房 + 恩格斯住宅理論��； 參考：《福建師范大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：文章基于恩格斯住宅理論、公共選擇理論的視角審視我國住房保障政策實(shí)施以來的各種問題,如保障住房建設(shè)中的“兩極化”問題、保障范圍界定不合理問題、尋租問題等,深層次剖析住房保障政策實(shí)施不力的原因,并針對(duì)2013年提出的廉租房、公租房并軌推行和十八大后共有產(chǎn)權(quán)房試點(diǎn)推行進(jìn)行實(shí)施前瞻分析,研究了美、德、香港、日本等發(fā)達(dá)國家和地區(qū)住房保障政策實(shí)施的情況和值得借鑒的經(jīng)驗(yàn),提出地方政府尋求刺激經(jīng)濟(jì)政策規(guī)避類似保障性住房政策等財(cái)富再分配型政策的傾向,并就上述各個(gè)問題提出了具體可行的解決對(duì)策和政策建議。
[Abstract]:Based on Engels' housing theory and public choice theory, this paper examines various problems since the implementation of housing security policy in China, such as "polarization" in housing construction, unreasonable definition of security scope, rent-seeking, and so on. Deeply analyze the reasons for the poor implementation of the housing security policy, and carry out a forward-looking analysis of the implementation of the low-rent housing policy, the parallel implementation of public housing and the pilot implementation of joint property rights housing after the 18th National Congress of the National Congress of the United States, Germany, Hong Kong, and the United States, Germany and Hong Kong. The implementation of housing security policies in developed countries and regions, such as Japan, and the experience that is worth learning from, put forward the tendency of local governments to seek to stimulate economic policies to avoid wealth-redistribution policies such as affordable housing policies. And put forward the concrete feasible solution countermeasure and policy suggestion to the above problems.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：福建師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：F299.23

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 郭玉坤;楊坤;;住房保障對(duì)象劃分研究[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2009年09期

2 艾其茂;;新中國六十年城鎮(zhèn)居民住房保障制度變遷的歷史考察[J];社會(huì)工作;2013年06期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 陳高巖;杭州經(jīng)濟(jì)租賃住房及其運(yùn)作模式分析[D];浙江工業(yè)大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：1950714