發(fā)布時間：2018-04-10 04:34

  本文選題：極值理論　切入點：動態(tài)保證金　出處：《浙江大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：風(fēng)險管理是金融市場永恒的主題,尤其是金融創(chuàng)新持續(xù)加速的今天,市場安全性成為參與者和監(jiān)管者共同關(guān)注的焦點。保證金制度是期貨市場風(fēng)險防范的核心內(nèi)容,也是期貨市場杠桿交易特性的來源。目前,國際成熟市場大多采用動態(tài)保證金制度,而我國期貨市場雖已多次根據(jù)市場風(fēng)險調(diào)整保證金水平,但仍沒有擺脫靜態(tài)保證金制度下保證金與市場風(fēng)險脫節(jié)、保證金水平偏高等弊端,導(dǎo)致現(xiàn)行保證金制度在風(fēng)險突然加大時無法控制違約風(fēng)險,在風(fēng)險較小時提高了交易成本和機會成本,削弱了杠桿交易對投資者的吸引力,不利于市場繁榮發(fā)展。在保證金制度改革的呼聲中,如何動態(tài)調(diào)整保證金水平成為學(xué)界討論的熱點問題。上市時間較短的股指期貨在這方面的研究受數(shù)據(jù)限制還不夠深入。 本文回顧總結(jié)了國內(nèi)外保證金水平設(shè)置的相關(guān)文獻,在理論層面對VaR模型、ES和譜風(fēng)險測度三個模型進行了比較,引入極值理論解決傳統(tǒng)分布和模型在尾部風(fēng)險擬合上精度較低的問題,構(gòu)建動態(tài)保證金設(shè)置模型。在理論分析基礎(chǔ)上,采用2010年4月16日至2013年2月1日的股指期貨數(shù)據(jù)和現(xiàn)貨數(shù)據(jù)進行實證研究,評價了不同模型在該應(yīng)用領(lǐng)域的優(yōu)劣,深入分析了不同合約不同頭寸的保證金水平。實證結(jié)果表明：極值理論在尾部風(fēng)險測度上具有顯著優(yōu)勢,基于極值理論的動態(tài)VaR模型精度最高,ES模型適用于我國目前較為謹慎的保證金水平設(shè)置原則,譜風(fēng)險測度能較好地適應(yīng)市場情緒顯著變化所導(dǎo)致的風(fēng)險變動；譜風(fēng)險測度結(jié)果表明,空頭風(fēng)險厭惡程度高于多頭,但在大盤走勢單邊下行時,多頭保證金水平更高；不同合約的多頭保證金水平在高謹慎性條件下差異顯著,遠月合約大大高于近月合約,流動性風(fēng)險不可忽視。
[Abstract]:Risk management is the eternal theme of financial market, especially with the continuous acceleration of financial innovation today, market security has become the common focus of participants and regulators.Margin system is not only the core content of futures market risk prevention, but also the source of leveraged trading characteristics of futures market.At present, most of the international mature markets adopt dynamic margin system. Although our futures market has adjusted the margin level according to the market risk many times, it still has not got rid of the disconnection between the margin and the market risk under the static margin system.The disadvantages of the high margin level lead to the current margin system being unable to control the default risk when the risk suddenly increases, which increases the transaction cost and opportunity cost when the risk is small, and weakens the attractiveness of leveraged trading to investors.It is not conducive to the prosperity of the market.In the voice of margin system reform, how to dynamically adjust the margin level has become a hot issue in academic circles.The research on the short time stock index futures is limited by the data.This paper reviews and summarizes the relevant literature on margin level setting at home and abroad, and compares the three models of VaR model and spectral risk measurement in theory.The extreme value theory is introduced to solve the problem of low precision of traditional distribution and model in tail risk fitting, and a dynamic margin setting model is constructed.On the basis of theoretical analysis, using stock index futures data and spot data from April 16, 2010 to February 1, 2013, the paper evaluates the advantages and disadvantages of different models in this field.The paper analyzes the margin level of different contracts and positions in depth.The empirical results show that the extreme value theory has significant advantages in tail risk measurement. The dynamic VaR model based on extreme value theory has the highest precision and the es model is suitable for the prudent margin level setting principle in China.The spectral risk measure can adapt to the risk change caused by the significant change of market sentiment, the result of spectrum risk measurement shows that the risk aversion of short is higher than that of long, but the level of long margin is higher when the market is going down unilaterally.The level of long margin in different contracts is significantly different under the condition of high caution, the far month contract is much higher than the recent month contract, the liquidity risk can not be ignored.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：F832.51;F224

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 徐國祥,吳澤智;我國指數(shù)期貨保證金水平設(shè)定方法及其實證研究——極值理論的應(yīng)用[J];財經(jīng)研究;2004年11期

2 韓德宗;王興鋒;楊敏敏;樓迎軍;;基于極值譜風(fēng)險測度的動態(tài)保證金水平設(shè)定[J];管理科學(xué);2009年01期

3 王志新;;基于LA-VaR的股指期貨保證金設(shè)置探討[J];價格月刊;2010年09期

4 劉少華;張宗成;;基于POT-Copula模型的我國期貨套利組合風(fēng)險研究[J];金融理論與實踐;2011年08期

5 蔣賢鋒;史永東;李慕春;;期貨市場保證金調(diào)整的市場風(fēng)險控制作用及制度改革——來自大連商品交易所的實證分析[J];金融研究;2007年02期

6 韓德宗;陳_";;基于極值理論的我國期貨市場保證金設(shè)置研究——經(jīng)流動性風(fēng)險調(diào)整后的優(yōu)化設(shè)置[J];南方經(jīng)濟;2006年07期

7 鮑建平;國內(nèi)外期貨市場保證金制度比較研究及其啟示[J];世界經(jīng)濟;2004年12期

8 桂文林;韓兆洲;潘慶年;;POT模型中GPD“厚尾”性及金融風(fēng)險測度[J];數(shù)量經(jīng)濟技術(shù)經(jīng)濟研究;2010年01期

9 路倩;余湄;白佳;;基于VaR的SPAN系統(tǒng)在我國股指期貨保證金中的應(yīng)用研究[J];系統(tǒng)科學(xué)與數(shù)學(xué);2011年03期

10 楊艷軍;王永鋒;;期貨市場交易保證金的設(shè)計[J];統(tǒng)計與決策;2005年24期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 孫曼;基于極值理論的VaR方法在股指期貨保證金中的應(yīng)用[D];中南大學(xué);2011年

2 廖宗武;期貨動態(tài)保證金結(jié)算制度研究[D];西南財經(jīng)大學(xué);2006年

3 陳衛(wèi)國;漲跌幅限制在期貨保證金水平設(shè)定中的研究[D];河南大學(xué);2010年

4 徐芳;多風(fēng)險結(jié)構(gòu)下期貨動態(tài)交易保證金模型構(gòu)建及實證研究[D];中南大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號：1729715