本文關(guān)鍵詞： 票據(jù) 票據(jù)抗辯權(quán) 票據(jù)抗辯制度 他人援用 除外制度　出處：《北京化工大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：隨著社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)的快速發(fā)展，票據(jù)已經(jīng)成為我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)活動(dòng)中一種重要的交易工具，票據(jù)的生命力得益于流通，促進(jìn)流通才能使票據(jù)功能得以更好更快的發(fā)揮，但現(xiàn)行票據(jù)理論還未能有效應(yīng)對(duì)票據(jù)抗辯實(shí)務(wù)的發(fā)展，其原因一方面是由于我們當(dāng)前社會(huì)的信用基礎(chǔ)缺失，更重要的一方面則是我國(guó)票據(jù)制度設(shè)計(jì)上的不足。 票據(jù)抗辯制度是票據(jù)法的重要內(nèi)容，是票據(jù)制度中的重要制度安排。票據(jù)抗辯的產(chǎn)生事由是否恰當(dāng)、票據(jù)抗辯的行使方式是否可行、票據(jù)抗辯的限制規(guī)定是否合理，直接影響著票據(jù)法立法價(jià)值的實(shí)現(xiàn)，更與票據(jù)法律關(guān)系當(dāng)事人的個(gè)體利益息息相關(guān)。本文主要從票據(jù)抗辯的理論依據(jù)、立法現(xiàn)狀、產(chǎn)生事由、權(quán)利行使及權(quán)利限制等方面入手，對(duì)票據(jù)使用過程中存在的實(shí)際問題進(jìn)行深入探討，并結(jié)合具體案例，著重對(duì)票據(jù)抗辯在實(shí)踐應(yīng)用中的棘手問題進(jìn)行梳理和歸納，尋找完善票據(jù)抗辯制度的理論根源和實(shí)施規(guī)則，以期對(duì)完善我國(guó)票據(jù)制度有所裨益。 本文通過對(duì)票據(jù)抗辯制度的研究，明確了抗辯與抗辯權(quán)的區(qū)別。對(duì)票據(jù)抗辯制度的立法價(jià)值取向進(jìn)行了探討，闡述了票據(jù)抗辯制度上維護(hù)交易公平、防止權(quán)利濫用、促進(jìn)票據(jù)流通、實(shí)現(xiàn)經(jīng)濟(jì)效益等法的價(jià)值，并將大陸法系、英美法系以及我國(guó)的票據(jù)抗辯立法進(jìn)行了對(duì)比研究。本文根據(jù)票據(jù)抗辯權(quán)產(chǎn)生事由在表現(xiàn)形式、構(gòu)成要件及理論基礎(chǔ)等方面的不同將其分為三類，上述三類產(chǎn)生事由分別源于實(shí)質(zhì)債務(wù)關(guān)系、票據(jù)記載內(nèi)容和當(dāng)事人惡意。本文對(duì)各類抗辯事由的具體內(nèi)容進(jìn)行了認(rèn)真梳理，為下文相關(guān)問題的解決提供了理論鋪墊。 本文重點(diǎn)論述了票據(jù)抗辯權(quán)行使的他人援用制度和票據(jù)抗辯權(quán)限制的除外制度。一方面，文章結(jié)合實(shí)際案例強(qiáng)調(diào)了確立票據(jù)抗辯權(quán)行使他人援用制度的必要性，并通過分析論證了他人援用制度應(yīng)當(dāng)且只應(yīng)適用于特定情況下的保證人抗辯及權(quán)利濫用抗辯、二重?zé)o權(quán)抗辯。本文分節(jié)對(duì)他人援用制度的意義、理論基礎(chǔ)、具體類型進(jìn)行了全面論述，為推動(dòng)我國(guó)票據(jù)抗辯權(quán)體系的完善，解決票據(jù)抗辯權(quán)行使的棘手問題探索了更為科學(xué)化的法律規(guī)則。另一方面，，參考所有權(quán)說、政策說、票據(jù)債權(quán)說等理論觀點(diǎn)對(duì)票據(jù)抗辯權(quán)限制進(jìn)行了深入的剖析，介紹了票據(jù)抗辯權(quán)限制的意義、理論依據(jù)及基本內(nèi)容，論證了票據(jù)抗辯權(quán)限制的除外制度主要適用于惡意抗辯、不以相當(dāng)對(duì)價(jià)取得票據(jù)、非以票據(jù)法規(guī)定方式取得票據(jù)等情形。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of social economy, bills have become an important trading tool in the economic activities of our country. The vitality of bills benefits from circulation, and only by promoting circulation can the function of bills be brought into play better and faster. However, the current bill theory has not been able to deal with the development of bill defense practice effectively, which is due to the lack of credit basis in our current society, and more importantly, the deficiency in the design of bill system in our country. Bill defense system is an important content of negotiable instrument law and an important system arrangement in bill system. Whether the cause of bill defense is appropriate, whether the exercise mode of bill defense is feasible, whether the restriction of bill defense is reasonable or not, It has a direct impact on the realization of the legislative value of negotiable instrument law, and is closely related to the individual interests of the parties concerned. This paper mainly starts with the theoretical basis of the bill defense, the current legislative situation, the cause of the production, the exercise of the right and the restriction of the right, etc. This paper probes into the practical problems existing in the process of bill use, and combining with specific cases, focuses on combing and summing up the thorny problems in the practical application of bill defense, in order to find out the theoretical origin and implementation rules of perfecting bill defense system. In order to improve the bill system in China. Through the research of bill defense system, this paper clarifies the difference between defense and defense right, probes into the legislative value orientation of bill defense system, and expounds the protection of transaction fairness and the prevention of abuse of rights in bill defense system. In order to promote the circulation of bills and realize the value of economic benefits, this paper makes a comparative study on the legislation of bill defense in civil law system, common law system and our country. These three reasons are derived from the substantial debt relationship, the contents of the notes and the malice of the parties. This paper makes a careful analysis of the specific contents of all kinds of defenses, which are divided into three categories, namely, the substantial debt relationship, the contents of the notes and the malice of the parties concerned. It provides a theoretical basis for solving the related problems below. This paper focuses on the system of invoking other people's right of defense and the system of excluding the restriction of bill's right of defense. On the one hand, the article emphasizes the necessity of establishing the system of invoking other people's right of defense of bill in combination with practical cases. Through the analysis, the author proves that the system of invoking by others should and should only be applied to the surety's defense and the plea of abuse of rights under certain circumstances, and the double defense with no right. The significance and theoretical basis of this article to the system of invoking by others are discussed in this paper. In order to promote the perfection of China's bill defense system and solve the thorny problem of the exercise of bill defense right, the author explores more scientific legal rules, on the other hand, referring to ownership theory and policy theory, The paper deeply analyzes the limitation of bill defense right from the viewpoint of bill creditor's right theory, introduces the significance, theoretical basis and basic content of bill defense right restriction, and proves that the exception system of bill defense right restriction mainly applies to malicious defense. Do not obtain a bill by equivalent consideration, not by means prescribed by the negotiable instrument law, etc.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京化工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D922.287

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 季衛(wèi)東;程序比較論[J];比較法研究;1993年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 于海斌;票據(jù)抗辯權(quán)研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2010年

本文編號(hào)：1553266