本文關(guān)鍵詞： 困境 城市化 小產(chǎn)權(quán)房 深圳市　出處：《華南理工大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：隨著我國經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展，農(nóng)村城市化正成為社會結(jié)構(gòu)變遷的一種表現(xiàn)形式，城市化離不開土地的開發(fā)利用。我國現(xiàn)行的土地制度是城鄉(xiāng)二元制，土地分為國家所有和農(nóng)村集體所有，但城市開發(fā)和建設(shè)只能利用國有土地，在這一制度邏輯下，農(nóng)村集體用地不能用于城市開發(fā)和利用，建設(shè)在農(nóng)村集體土地的城市工商業(yè)用房及住宅得不到國家發(fā)證確權(quán)，俗稱小產(chǎn)權(quán)房。一方面，國家嚴(yán)禁小產(chǎn)權(quán)房的建造和銷售，另一方面卻是民間小產(chǎn)權(quán)房市場的購銷兩旺。小產(chǎn)權(quán)房成為政府亟需解決的難題。 深圳從一個(gè)漁村發(fā)展成經(jīng)濟(jì)特區(qū)，正是農(nóng)村城市化的一個(gè)標(biāo)本，不可避免地出現(xiàn)小產(chǎn)權(quán)房問題。深圳經(jīng)歷的農(nóng)村城市化，是所謂農(nóng)村集體用地概括國有化的過程，政府通過取消農(nóng)業(yè)戶口，撤消農(nóng)村集體經(jīng)濟(jì)組織建制，建立社區(qū)居委會等方式推進(jìn)城市化，并將城市化后屬于農(nóng)民集體經(jīng)濟(jì)組織的土地直接宣布為國家所有。這一做法繞過了集體土地經(jīng)征收轉(zhuǎn)為國有用地的土地征用制度，改變了行政區(qū)域的土地性質(zhì)，卻難以改變深圳原農(nóng)村小產(chǎn)權(quán)房蓬勃發(fā)展的狀況。隨著深圳城市化及特區(qū)一體化進(jìn)程的深入，土地資源日益短缺與城市發(fā)展用地需求激增之間的矛盾進(jìn)一步加劇，為釋放現(xiàn)有土地資源，必須處理占用原集體現(xiàn)國有土地的小產(chǎn)權(quán)房。2009年5月21日，深圳市出臺《關(guān)于農(nóng)村城市化歷史遺留違法建筑的處理決定》，啟動(dòng)了對小產(chǎn)權(quán)房的處理程序，然而三年多過去了，政府只完成了數(shù)據(jù)普查工作，小產(chǎn)權(quán)房的處理問題卻懸而未決。針對于此，本文試圖從小產(chǎn)權(quán)房產(chǎn)生原因、困境根源、現(xiàn)行土地制度分析著手，，結(jié)合深圳小產(chǎn)權(quán)房現(xiàn)狀及政府監(jiān)管政策，基于“產(chǎn)權(quán)清晰、權(quán)責(zé)明確、要素流通、市場導(dǎo)向、政府監(jiān)管”的目標(biāo)導(dǎo)向，從社會穩(wěn)定、法律正義、市場經(jīng)濟(jì)的角度提出解決深圳小產(chǎn)權(quán)房困境問題的建議。
[Abstract]:With the development of our economy, rural urbanization is becoming a form of social structure change, urbanization can not be separated from the development and utilization of land. The current land system of our country is urban-rural dual system. Land is divided into national ownership and rural collective ownership, but urban development and construction can only use state-owned land, in this system logic, rural collective land can not be used for urban development and utilization. Construction in the rural collective land of urban industrial and commercial housing and housing can not obtain the right to state certification, commonly known as small property rights. On the one hand, the state strictly prohibits the construction and sale of small property houses. On the other hand, the purchase and sale of private small property house is booming. Small property house has become a difficult problem that the government needs to solve. The development of Shenzhen from a fishing village to a special economic zone is a specimen of rural urbanization, which inevitably leads to the problem of small property rights. It is the process of nationalization of rural collective land. The government promotes urbanization by canceling agricultural hukou canceling rural collective economic organization and establishing community neighborhood committee. After urbanization, the land belonging to farmers' collective economic organizations is declared to be owned by the state directly. This practice bypasses the land expropriation system of collective land expropriation into state-owned land, and changes the land nature of administrative regions. However, it is difficult to change the booming situation of the small property houses in the former rural areas of Shenzhen. With the deepening of the process of urbanization and integration of the special zone in Shenzhen. The contradiction between the increasing shortage of land resources and the sharp increase in the demand for land for urban development is further aggravated in order to release the existing land resources. It is necessary to deal with the small property right houses that occupy the original set of state-owned land. On May 21st 2009, Shenzhen issued a decision on the disposal of illegal buildings left over from the history of rural urbanization. Started to deal with the small property house procedures, but more than three years have passed, the government has only completed the data census work, the small property house processing problem is still unresolved. In view of this, this article attempts to produce the reason from the small property house. The root of the predicament, the current land system analysis, combined with the current situation of small property rights in Shenzhen and government regulatory policies, based on "clear property rights, clear rights and responsibilities, the circulation of elements, market guidance, government supervision" goal orientation. From the angle of social stability, legal justice and market economy, the paper puts forward some suggestions to solve the dilemma of Shenzhen small property house.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華南理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：F299.23

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張清勇;;住房、住房問題與住房政策:一個(gè)綜述[J];財(cái)貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);2008年01期

2 張占錄;;以土地發(fā)展權(quán)合理配置解決小產(chǎn)權(quán)房問題[J];城鄉(xiāng)建設(shè);2009年07期

3 汪楊;;改革“小產(chǎn)權(quán)房”的制度經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析[J];財(cái)經(jīng)政法資訊;2010年03期

4 魯曉明;;論小產(chǎn)權(quán)房流轉(zhuǎn)——原罪的形成與應(yīng)然法的選擇[J];法學(xué)雜志;2010年05期

5 劉國臻;;論我國土地發(fā)展權(quán)的法律性質(zhì)[J];法學(xué)雜志;2011年03期

6 張曙光;;城市化背景下土地產(chǎn)權(quán)的實(shí)施和保護(hù)[J];管理世界;2007年12期

7 王媛;;土地資本化、城市化與城市經(jīng)濟(jì)增長——深圳土地制度改革的意義[J];中國房地產(chǎn);2012年19期

8 劉芳;趙新平;岳雋;;快速城市化背景下原農(nóng)村集體留用地的產(chǎn)權(quán)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析——以深圳為例[J];廣東土地科學(xué);2011年04期

9 郭清根;;“小產(chǎn)權(quán)房”現(xiàn)象中政府職能缺失和處置對策[J];河南社會科學(xué);2008年05期

10 許海燕;梅昀;張漢江;;利益博弈視角下小產(chǎn)權(quán)房的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)思考[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)體制改革;2008年05期

本文編號：1480255