本文關(guān)鍵詞： Ofifce軟件 博弈論 兼容策略 平臺(tái)軟件　出處：《南京大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：在我國(guó)由于市場(chǎng)需求的不斷擴(kuò)大以及政府的積極扶持,近年來國(guó)產(chǎn)Office軟件企業(yè)取得了快速發(fā)展。但是,國(guó)產(chǎn)Office軟件在與國(guó)際巨頭的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)中仍然處于劣勢(shì)。因此對(duì)國(guó)產(chǎn)Office軟件而言,機(jī)遇與挑戰(zhàn)并存。究竟應(yīng)該采取何種策略,才能抓住市場(chǎng)機(jī)遇建立和擴(kuò)大企業(yè)的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)優(yōu)勢(shì),這是擺在永中及所有國(guó)產(chǎn)Office軟件廠商面前的一個(gè)非常重要的課題。 論文首先對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)外Office軟件業(yè)作了總體闡述,回顧了國(guó)產(chǎn)Office在我國(guó)發(fā)展的歷史階段,并重點(diǎn)介紹了永中軟件的發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀。在對(duì)國(guó)產(chǎn)Office軟件企業(yè)進(jìn)行市場(chǎng)調(diào)查的基礎(chǔ)上,對(duì)我國(guó)Office軟件行業(yè)的市場(chǎng)情況進(jìn)行了分析,同時(shí)應(yīng)用波特“五力模型”對(duì)國(guó)產(chǎn)Office軟件的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)環(huán)境進(jìn)行分析,指出國(guó)產(chǎn)Office廠商面臨的巨大競(jìng)爭(zhēng)壓力。 隨后論文對(duì)國(guó)產(chǎn)Office的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)策略進(jìn)行研究。由于Office具有網(wǎng)絡(luò)外部性,而且國(guó)產(chǎn)Office廠商屬于后入者,因此研究重點(diǎn)是網(wǎng)絡(luò)外部性下的后入者與在位者的博弈。論文分別從三個(gè)不同角度進(jìn)行探討。第一是從一般的應(yīng)用軟件按角度,借助博弈論分析國(guó)產(chǎn)Office廠商的兼容性策略,指出國(guó)產(chǎn)Office廠商在創(chuàng)新的同時(shí)必須要實(shí)現(xiàn)與在位廠商一定程度的兼容,；第二是從帶有APIs的系統(tǒng)軟件角度,指出Office軟件的互補(bǔ)品種類也是重要的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)因素,并借助博弈論分析國(guó)產(chǎn)Office廠商的差異化策略,指出國(guó)產(chǎn)Office廠商如要與在位者共存,必須要采取差異化策略,爭(zhēng)取更多的互補(bǔ)品開發(fā)商的支持,并鎖定部分消費(fèi)者；最后是從平臺(tái)軟件的角度,用平臺(tái)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)理論分析國(guó)產(chǎn)Office廠商在無法實(shí)現(xiàn)與主流平臺(tái)完全兼容的情況下可以采取的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)策略。 在分析的基礎(chǔ)上,本文在推動(dòng)Office互補(bǔ)應(yīng)用開發(fā)、建立完整產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈和標(biāo)準(zhǔn)戰(zhàn)略實(shí)施等方面提出相關(guān)建議。
[Abstract]:In China, due to the continuous expansion of market demand and the active support of the government, domestic Office software enterprises have made rapid development in recent years. The domestic Office software is still at a disadvantage in the competition with the international giants. Therefore, for the domestic Office software, opportunities and challenges coexist. What strategies should be adopted. Only in order to seize the market opportunity to establish and expand the competitive advantage of enterprises, this is a very important issue in front of Yongzhong and all the domestic Office software manufacturers. Firstly, the paper gives a general description of the domestic and foreign Office software industry, and reviews the historical stage of the development of domestic Office in China. Based on the market investigation of domestic Office software enterprises, the market situation of Office software industry in China is analyzed. At the same time, the author analyzes the competitive environment of domestic Office software by using Porter's "five Force Model", and points out the great competition pressure faced by domestic Office manufacturers. Then the paper studies the competitive strategy of domestic Office. Because Office has network externality and domestic Office manufacturers belong to the latter. Therefore, the focus of the study is the game between the entrant and the incumbent under the network externality. The thesis discusses the game from three different angles. The first is from the perspective of general application software. By analyzing the compatibility strategies of domestic Office manufacturers with the aid of game theory, it is pointed out that domestic Office manufacturers must achieve compatibility with the incumbent manufacturers to a certain extent while innovating. Second, from the point of view of the system software with APIs, it points out that the type of complementary products of Office software is also an important competitive factor, and analyzes the differentiation strategy of domestic Office manufacturers with the help of game theory. It is pointed out that if the domestic Office manufacturers want to coexist with the incumbent, they must adopt the differentiation strategy, win the support of more complementary developers, and lock in some consumers. Finally, from the point of view of platform software, this paper analyzes the competitive strategies that domestic Office manufacturers can adopt when they can not achieve full compatibility with mainstream platforms by using platform competition theory. On the basis of the analysis, this paper puts forward some suggestions on promoting the development of complementary application of Office, establishing a complete industrial chain and implementing the standard strategy.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：F272;F49

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 唐要家;于立;;系統(tǒng)市場(chǎng)中企業(yè)策略性排他行為分析[J];中國(guó)工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2006年06期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 李泉;雙邊市場(chǎng)價(jià)格理論及其產(chǎn)業(yè)應(yīng)用研究[D];上海交通大學(xué);2008年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 謝文容;引入轉(zhuǎn)換成本的平臺(tái)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)問題研究[D];上海交通大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：1468350