為了尋求新的知識(shí)和技術(shù)能力以及區(qū)位優(yōu)勢,很多公司開始走出國門來進(jìn)行跨國收購。尤其對于高科技企業(yè)來說,技術(shù)的更新?lián)Q代非常頻繁。高科技企業(yè)通過跨國并購可以快速獲得先進(jìn)技術(shù)、提升創(chuàng)新績效和核心競爭力。因此,無論從學(xué)界還是業(yè)界,都有必要來深入探討如何提高技術(shù)型跨國并購的創(chuàng)新績效。本論文試圖從三個(gè)方面來進(jìn)行實(shí)證探討,以期進(jìn)一步豐富技術(shù)型跨國并購的理論文獻(xiàn),并為高科技企業(yè)提供一定的實(shí)踐指導(dǎo)。第一篇實(shí)證論文著重探討當(dāng)技術(shù)型跨國并購交易完成之后,收購的股權(quán)比例和整合程度如何有助于提升并購后的創(chuàng)新績效。在結(jié)合委托代理理論和資源基礎(chǔ)理論的基礎(chǔ)上,本文提出兩個(gè)重要假設(shè):（1）并購方收購的股權(quán)比例與其創(chuàng)新績效成正相關(guān)關(guān)系;（2）并購后的整合程度在股權(quán)比例與創(chuàng)新績效之間起到中介作用。通過對來自生物技術(shù)、計(jì)算機(jī)、通信和電子行業(yè)的546家公司的跨國并購事件的分析,本文發(fā)現(xiàn):并購方收購的股權(quán)比例越高,隨后的整合程度越高,相應(yīng)地并購方未來的創(chuàng)新績效也越好。第二篇實(shí)證研究主要探討制度距離在技術(shù)型跨國并購中的作用。任何跨國并購都會(huì)涉及到兩個(gè)或兩個(gè)以上的國家的參與。每個(gè)國家都有自己獨(dú)特的制度環(huán)境。本文認(rèn)為,雖然并購方收購的股... 

【文章來源】：對外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)北京市 211工程院校 教育部直屬院校

【文章頁數(shù)】：270 頁

【學(xué)位級別】：博士

【文章目錄】：
摘要
Abstract
List of Abbreviations
CHAPTER 1:Introduction of the Dissertation
    1.1 Introduction
    1.2 Motivation for the Study
    1.3 Research Questions
    1.4 Structure of the Dissertation
    1.5 Research Framework of the Dissertation
    1.6 Contributions to the Literature
CHAPTER 2:Review of the Literature
    2.1 Factors in Technology Acquisitions
        2.1.1 Technological Acquisitions
        2.1.2 Post-Acquisition Innovation Performance
        2.1.3 Acquired ownership
        2.1.4 Degree of Integration
        2.1.5 Direction
        2.1.6 Institutional Distance
    2.2 Contributing Theories of the study
        2.2.1 Resources Based View
        2.2.2 Agency Theory
        2.2.3 Institutional Theory
CHAPTER 3:From Acquired ownership to Post-Acquisition Innovation Performance:Mediating Role of Degree of integration
    3.1 Introduction
    3.2 Theories and Hypotheses Development
        3.2.1 Acquired ownership and Degree of integration
        3.2.2 Degree of integration and Post-Acquisition Innovation Performance
        3.2.3 Degree of integration as a Mediator
    3.3 Research Methodology
        3.3.1 Sample and Data
        3.3.2 Variables and Measurement
        3.3.3 Statistical Model
    3.4 Analysis of the Study
        3.4.1 Results and Findings
        3.4.2 Robustness Test of the Hypotheses
    3.5 Summary of this Chapter
CHAPTER 4:Acquired Ownership and Post-Acquisition Innovation Performance:Role of Institutional Distance
    4.1 Introduction
    4.2 Theories and Hypotheses Development
        4.2.1 Acquired ownership and Post-Acquisition Innovation Performance
        4.2.2 The Moderating Role of Institutional Distance
            4.2.2.1 Moderating Role of Regulatory Institutional Distance
            4.2.2.2 Moderating Role of Normative Institutional Distance
            4.2.2.3 Moderating Role of Cultural-Cognitive Institutional Distance
    4.3 Research Methodology
        4.3.1 Data and Sample
        4.3.2 Variables and Measurement
        4.3.3 Statistical Model
    4.4 Analysis of the Study
        4.4.1 Results and Findings
        4.4.2 Robustness Test of the Hypotheses
    4.5 Summary of this Chapter
CHAPTER 5:Does Direction Matter?Role of Direction on Acquisition Decisions and Post-Acquisition Innovation Performance
    5.1 Introduction
    5.2 Theories and Hypotheses Development
        5.2.1 Direction and Acquired ownership
        5.2.2 Direction and Degree of integration
        5.2.3 Direction and Post-Acquisition Innovation Performance
    5.3 Research Methodology
        5.3.1 Sample and Data
        5.3.2 Variables and Measurement
        5.3.3 Statistical Model
    5.4 Analysis of the Study
        5.4.1 Results and Findings
        5.4.2 Robustness Test of the Study
    5.5 Summary of this Chapter
CHAPTER 6:Summary of the Dissertation
    6.1 Major Findings
    6.2 Discussions
    6.3 Contributions
    6.4 Implications
        6.4.1 Academic Implications
        6.4.2 Practical Implications
    6.5 Limitations and Future Research
References
Acknowledgement
Annexure 1 Summary of Past Studies
Annexure 2 Variables and Measurement
CURRICULUM VITAE



本文編號：3493058