本文選題：用益 + 信托　； 參考：《中南大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：摘要：信托制度源于英美法系之衡平法,在信托法律關(guān)系中,委托人是信托的設(shè)立者,是制定信托目的,基于對受托人的信任將自己的特定財產(chǎn)權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)移給受托人,由受托人依其意愿為受益人的利益或特定目的進(jìn)行管理或者處分之人,沒有委托人信托制度不可能出現(xiàn)。在美國開創(chuàng)商事信托和生前遺囑代用信托的過程中對傳統(tǒng)的信托制度,即信托成立之后委托人便脫離開信托關(guān)系的制度實施了改良,只要在信托行為中有約定,委托人作為信托當(dāng)事人可以享有撤銷信托、變更信托管理方法和受益人的權(quán)利,只不過委托人權(quán)利必須是在信托行為中做出事先約定保留,從某種程度上還是約束于傳統(tǒng)的信托法理論,即信托設(shè)立后委托人便脫離信托關(guān)系。進(jìn)而,信托制度在后來為大陸法系的日本、韓國以及我國等國家相繼移植的過程中,為使信托制度與本國的社會文化、法律傳統(tǒng)相協(xié)調(diào),移植國家對信托制度的內(nèi)容均予以了不同程度的改造,委托人的法律地位和權(quán)利的賦予便是其中突出之處,使委托人經(jīng)歷了由傳統(tǒng)英美信托法未規(guī)定其權(quán)利到大陸法系信托法賦予多種權(quán)利的歷史變遷。本文以“信托委托人法律地位演進(jìn)”為切入點,詳細(xì)剖析了委托人法律地位演進(jìn)的階段及原因,從而對信托制度發(fā)展史進(jìn)行了梳理,力求為我國信托法理論研究提供有益借鑒。
[Abstract]:Abstract: the trust system originates from the equity law of the common law system. In the trust legal relationship, the trustor is the founder of the trust and the purpose of establishing the trust, and transfers his specific property right to the trustee based on the trust to the trustee. A person who is managed or punished by the trustee at his will for the benefit of the beneficiary or for a specific purpose cannot appear without the trust system of the trustor. In the process of creating commercial trust and living testamentary substitute trust in the United States, the traditional trust system, that is, the system in which the client breaks away from the trust relationship after the establishment of the trust, has been improved, as long as there is an agreement in the trust act. The trustor, as a party to the trust, may enjoy the right to revoke the trust, change the management method of the trust and the beneficiary, except that the right of the trustor must be reserved in advance in the trust act. To some extent, it is bound by the traditional trust law theory, that is, the trustor breaks away from the trust relationship after the establishment of the trust. Furthermore, in the process of transplanting the trust system in Japan, Korea and China, which was later the continental law system, in order to harmonize the trust system with the social culture of our country, the legal tradition is harmonious. The transplant countries have reformed the contents of the trust system to varying degrees, and the legal status and the right of the principal are the prominent ones. The client has experienced the historical changes from the traditional Anglo-American Trust Law which does not stipulate its rights to the continental law system trust law to grant a variety of rights. Based on the evolution of the legal status of the trustor, this paper analyzes in detail the stages and reasons of the evolution of the legal status of the trustor, thus combing the history of the development of the trust system in order to provide a useful reference for the theoretical study of the trust law in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.282

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 海因·克茨;鄧建中;;信托——典型的英美法系制度[J];比較法研究;2009年04期

2 張軍建,陳光;中日信托法委托人法律地位的比較研究[J];文史博覽;2005年Z1期

3 張軍建;;論中國信托法中的委托人的撤銷權(quán)——兼評中國《信托法》第22條[J];法學(xué)家;2007年03期

4 張軍建;;信托連續(xù)受益人制度[J];湖南大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2011年04期

5 周勤;;日本《信托法》的兩次價值選擇——以意定信托委托人的權(quán)利為中心[J];華僑大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2010年03期

6 程淑娟;;委托人享有所有權(quán)的信托——俄羅斯“財產(chǎn)的委托管理”制度及啟示[J];黑龍江社會科學(xué);2007年04期

7 約翰·H.蘭貝恩;何美歡;;信托法的合同基礎(chǔ)[J];清華法學(xué);2004年01期

8 李勇;美國《統(tǒng)一信托法典》述評[J];邵陽學(xué)院學(xué)報;2005年01期

9 李宇;;商業(yè)信托委托人的法律地位[J];法學(xué)論壇;2012年05期

10 冉昊;;論兩大法系財產(chǎn)法結(jié)構(gòu)的共通性——英美法系雙重所有權(quán)與大陸法系物權(quán)債權(quán)二元劃分的功能類比[J];環(huán)球法律評論;2006年01期

，

本文編號：2098779