會(huì)計(jì)師事務(wù)所規(guī)模與投資者感知的審計(jì)質(zhì)量的關(guān)系研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-11-08 07:02
【摘要】: 會(huì)計(jì)師事務(wù)所規(guī)模和審計(jì)質(zhì)量之間的關(guān)系一直以來都是審計(jì)行業(yè)及學(xué)術(shù)界關(guān)注的一個(gè)焦點(diǎn)問題。國(guó)外的現(xiàn)有文獻(xiàn)大多得到了“大規(guī)模即高質(zhì)量”的結(jié)論,并且也發(fā)現(xiàn)投資者能夠正確地認(rèn)識(shí)到這一事實(shí);但是中國(guó)的學(xué)者們還沒有就此達(dá)成一致。本文利用會(huì)計(jì)盈余價(jià)值相關(guān)性的回報(bào)模型,試圖從投資者這一較新的角度切入,以研究和發(fā)現(xiàn)我國(guó)會(huì)計(jì)師事務(wù)所的規(guī)模與投資者感知的審計(jì)質(zhì)量之間的關(guān)系。 基于會(huì)計(jì)師事務(wù)所統(tǒng)計(jì)特征的分析,我們將本文中的“大所”確定為2001年到2006年間平均上市公司客戶數(shù)大于27家的事務(wù)所,使用的數(shù)據(jù)范圍包括2001年到2005年中國(guó)資本市場(chǎng)滬深兩市所有的A股上市公司。研究后發(fā)現(xiàn),規(guī)模大的事務(wù)所并不能顯著增加其客戶的會(huì)計(jì)盈余價(jià)值相關(guān)性,且穩(wěn)健性檢驗(yàn)也沒有改變這一結(jié)果。因此本文的結(jié)論是,在我國(guó)目前的制度環(huán)境下,事務(wù)所規(guī)模不會(huì)影響投資者對(duì)審計(jì)質(zhì)量的感知和判斷,即投資者認(rèn)為規(guī)模大的事務(wù)所和規(guī)模小的事務(wù)所的審計(jì)質(zhì)量沒有差異。這一制度特征對(duì)政府制定行業(yè)政策、上市公司聘請(qǐng)會(huì)計(jì)師事務(wù)所具有一定的參考價(jià)值。
[Abstract]:The relationship between the size of accounting firms and audit quality has always been a focus of the audit industry and academia. Most of the existing foreign literature has come to the conclusion that "large scale is high quality" and that investors are able to recognize this fact correctly, but Chinese scholars have not yet reached an agreement on this point. Using the return model of accounting earnings value correlation, this paper attempts to explore the relationship between the size of accounting firms and the audit quality perceived by investors from the perspective of investors. Based on the analysis of the statistical characteristics of accounting firms, we define the "big houses" in this paper as the firms with more than 27 clients in the period from 2001 to 2006. The range of data used includes all A-share listed companies in China's capital markets, Shanghai and Shenzhen from 2001 to 2005. It is found that large firms can not significantly increase the correlation of earnings value of their clients, and the conservatism test does not change the results. Therefore, the conclusion of this paper is that under the current institutional environment of our country, firm size will not affect investors' perception and judgment of audit quality, that is, investors think that there is no difference in audit quality between large firms and small firms. This system characteristic has certain reference value to the government to make the profession policy and the listed company to employ the accounting firm.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2008
【分類號(hào)】:F233;F239.4;F224
本文編號(hào):2317733
[Abstract]:The relationship between the size of accounting firms and audit quality has always been a focus of the audit industry and academia. Most of the existing foreign literature has come to the conclusion that "large scale is high quality" and that investors are able to recognize this fact correctly, but Chinese scholars have not yet reached an agreement on this point. Using the return model of accounting earnings value correlation, this paper attempts to explore the relationship between the size of accounting firms and the audit quality perceived by investors from the perspective of investors. Based on the analysis of the statistical characteristics of accounting firms, we define the "big houses" in this paper as the firms with more than 27 clients in the period from 2001 to 2006. The range of data used includes all A-share listed companies in China's capital markets, Shanghai and Shenzhen from 2001 to 2005. It is found that large firms can not significantly increase the correlation of earnings value of their clients, and the conservatism test does not change the results. Therefore, the conclusion of this paper is that under the current institutional environment of our country, firm size will not affect investors' perception and judgment of audit quality, that is, investors think that there is no difference in audit quality between large firms and small firms. This system characteristic has certain reference value to the government to make the profession policy and the listed company to employ the accounting firm.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2008
【分類號(hào)】:F233;F239.4;F224
【引證文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 程永泉;會(huì)計(jì)師事務(wù)所規(guī)模化發(fā)展與審計(jì)質(zhì)量研究[D];北京工商大學(xué);2010年
2 馬熙辰;會(huì)計(jì)師事務(wù)所合并對(duì)審計(jì)質(zhì)量的影響分析[D];東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2012年
,本文編號(hào):2317733
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/sjlw/2317733.html
最近更新
教材專著