【摘要】：2003年新一輪集體林權(quán)制度改革以來(lái),農(nóng)戶作為集體林權(quán)制度改革的主體,同時(shí)也是參與林地流轉(zhuǎn)市場(chǎng)交易的主體,其流轉(zhuǎn)意愿影響著林地使用權(quán)的流轉(zhuǎn)。隨著我國(guó)山區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì)的快速發(fā)展和城鎮(zhèn)化步伐的加快,農(nóng)民就業(yè)途徑和收入來(lái)源的多元化,形成了不同的農(nóng)民階層,而不同階層農(nóng)民的林地流轉(zhuǎn)意愿可能存在差異。對(duì)土地的依賴程度不同,即對(duì)林地產(chǎn)權(quán)的不同偏好,也可能會(huì)表現(xiàn)為林地流轉(zhuǎn)意愿的差異。本文希望尋找影響農(nóng)戶林地流轉(zhuǎn)意愿的驅(qū)動(dòng)因素和限制因素,來(lái)促進(jìn)林地進(jìn)一步流轉(zhuǎn)。研究采用浙江省4個(gè)縣(市)187戶微觀農(nóng)戶數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行分析。首先,描述樣本地區(qū)農(nóng)民階層分化狀況、林地產(chǎn)權(quán)偏好狀況和林地流轉(zhuǎn)意愿狀況;其次,交叉統(tǒng)計(jì)不同階層農(nóng)民的林地產(chǎn)權(quán)偏好狀況和林地流轉(zhuǎn)意愿狀況;最后,采用二元Logistic模型分析農(nóng)戶林地流轉(zhuǎn)意愿的影響因素。得到以下結(jié)論:隨著山區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展和城鎮(zhèn)化的推進(jìn),以往高度同質(zhì)的農(nóng)民群體已經(jīng)開始分化。農(nóng)民對(duì)林地產(chǎn)權(quán)制度的偏好有所不同,大部分農(nóng)戶認(rèn)為林地產(chǎn)權(quán)是重要的。187戶農(nóng)戶中,44.92%的農(nóng)戶有流轉(zhuǎn)意愿,55.08%的農(nóng)戶想保持不變,有林地流轉(zhuǎn)意愿的農(nóng)戶數(shù)少于想保持不變的農(nóng)戶數(shù)。有流轉(zhuǎn)意愿的農(nóng)戶,其想要流轉(zhuǎn)的規(guī)模、期限、動(dòng)因等也有所不同。各職業(yè)階層對(duì)林地各類產(chǎn)權(quán)的偏好較強(qiáng)。認(rèn)為林地使用權(quán)、林地抵押權(quán)重要的,務(wù)工階層的農(nóng)戶占比最高;認(rèn)為林地收益權(quán)重要的,經(jīng)商階層的農(nóng)戶占比最高;認(rèn)為林地轉(zhuǎn)讓權(quán)重要的,管理者階層的農(nóng)戶占比最高;認(rèn)為林地繼承權(quán)重要的,務(wù)農(nóng)階層的農(nóng)戶占比最高。不同家庭收入水平的農(nóng)戶對(duì)林地產(chǎn)權(quán)的偏好較強(qiáng)。且認(rèn)為林地收益權(quán)、林地轉(zhuǎn)讓權(quán)和林地繼承權(quán)重要的,家庭收入水平處于下層的農(nóng)戶占比最高;認(rèn)為林地抵押權(quán)重要的,家庭收入水平處于中下層的農(nóng)戶占比最高;認(rèn)為林地使用權(quán)的偏好重要的,家庭收入水平處于中層的農(nóng)戶占比最高。經(jīng)商階層和管理者階層的流轉(zhuǎn)意愿更強(qiáng),務(wù)農(nóng)階層、務(wù)工階層傾向于保持現(xiàn)狀。愿意流入的農(nóng)戶中,管理者階層農(nóng)戶占比最高;愿意流出的農(nóng)戶中,經(jīng)商階層農(nóng)戶占比最高。不論家庭收入處于哪個(gè)水平,希望保持不變的農(nóng)戶占多數(shù)。處于下層、中下層和上層的流入意愿強(qiáng)于流出意愿,中層、中上層的流出意愿強(qiáng)于流入意愿。愿意流入的農(nóng)戶中,上層農(nóng)戶占比最高;愿意流出的農(nóng)戶中,中層農(nóng)戶占比最高。在農(nóng)戶林地流出意愿影響因素模型中,林地轉(zhuǎn)讓權(quán)偏好強(qiáng)度、人均林地面積對(duì)農(nóng)戶林地流出意愿有顯著的正向影響;與對(duì)照組(務(wù)農(nóng)階層)相比,經(jīng)商階層的林地流出意愿更加強(qiáng)烈;與對(duì)照組(上層)相比,家庭收入處于中下層的農(nóng)戶其流出意愿更加強(qiáng)烈;與對(duì)照組(上層)相比,家庭收入處于中上層的農(nóng)戶的流出意愿更加強(qiáng)烈;以永康作為基準(zhǔn)組,開化、臨安的農(nóng)戶比永康的農(nóng)戶更不傾向于流出。在農(nóng)戶林地流入意愿影響因素模型中,年齡、人均林地面積對(duì)農(nóng)戶林地流入意愿有顯著的負(fù)向影響;以前有過(guò)流轉(zhuǎn)行為的農(nóng)戶其流入意愿比未曾有過(guò)流轉(zhuǎn)行為的更強(qiáng)烈;與對(duì)照組(上層)相比,家庭收入水平處于中上層的農(nóng)戶流入意愿更弱;開化、臨安和龍泉農(nóng)戶的流入意愿比永康的農(nóng)戶更強(qiáng)烈。根據(jù)以上結(jié)論,提出以下建議:一是,建立健全林權(quán)交易中心,發(fā)布流轉(zhuǎn)信息。二是,發(fā)展非農(nóng)產(chǎn)業(yè),提高農(nóng)民收入水平。三是,尊重農(nóng)戶的意愿,鼓勵(lì)農(nóng)戶進(jìn)行林地流轉(zhuǎn)。
[Abstract]:Since the reform of the new collective forest rights system in 2003, the peasant household as the main body of the reform of the collective forest rights system, and also the main body of the trade in the forest land circulation market, its circulation will affect the circulation of the right to use the forest land. With the rapid development of the mountain economy and the pace of urbanization in our country, the farmer's employment path and the diversification of the source of income have formed different peasant stratum, and there may be a difference between the forest land circulation intention of different stratum farmers. The degree of dependence of land is different, that is, the different preference of forest land property right, may also appear as the difference of forest land circulation intention. In this paper, we hope to find the driving factors and limiting factors that affect the will of farmers' forest land circulation, and promote the further circulation of forest land. The data of 187 micro-farmers in 4 counties (cities) in Zhejiang Province were studied. Firstly, the status of peasant stratum differentiation in the sample area, the preference status of forest land and the will of forest land circulation will be described. The influence factors of farmer's forest land circulation will be analyzed by using the binary Logistic model. The following conclusions are obtained: With the development of mountain economy and the advance of urbanization, the former highly homogeneous group of farmers has begun to differentiate. The preference of farmers to forest land property rights system is different. Most farmers think forest land property rights are important. Among 187 households, 44. 92% of farmers have circulation will, 55. 08% of farmers want to remain unchanged, the number of farmers with forest land circulation will be less than the number of farmers who want to keep the same. The scale, time limit, motivation and so on are different from the farmers who have the desire to flow. Each occupation class has strong preference for various kinds of property rights in forestland. It is considered that the land use right and forest land mortgage are important, and the farmers account for the highest proportion; it is considered that the forest land usufruct is important, and the peasant households in the business class make up the highest proportion; it is considered that the forest land use right is important, the farmer accounts for the manager stratum is higher than the highest; it is considered important to inherit the forest land. The farmers in the farming class make up the highest. Farmers with different household income levels have strong preference for forest land property rights. And it is considered that the income right of forest land, the right of forest land and the inheritance of forest land are important, the household income level is at the lower level, the household income level is higher than the highest; it is considered that forest land mortgage is important, the household income level is at the lowest level, the farmer accounts for the highest proportion; it is considered that the preference of forest land use right is important, Household income levels are among the highest in middle-class households. The turnover intention of the business class and the manager class is stronger, the farming class and the worker class tend to keep the status quo. Among the farmers who are willing to flow into, the farmers account for the highest proportion; among the farmers who are willing to flow out, the farmers account for the highest proportion. Regardless of the level of household income, it is desirable to keep the same farmers in the majority. In the lower layer, the inflow intention of the upper and lower layers is stronger than the outflow intention, and the outflow intention of the middle layer and the middle layer is stronger than the inflow intention. Among the farmers who are willing to flow into, the upper-level farmers account for the highest proportion; among the farmers who are willing to flow out, middle-level farmers are the highest. Compared with the control group, the willingness of forestland outflow was stronger than that of the control group (the farming class). Compared with the control group (upper layer), the farmers whose household income is in the middle and lower levels has a stronger outflow intention. Compared with the control group (the upper layer), the outflow intention of the peasant households in the middle and lower layers is more intense, and Yongkang is used as a reference group and is opened, Linan's farmers are more inclined to flow out than Yongkang's farmers. In the model of farmer's forestland inflow will influence factor model, the age, per capita forest land area has a significant negative influence on the farmer's forestland inflow will. The household income level is in the middle-upper level, the farmers inflow will be weaker; open, Linan and Longquan farmer's inflow will be stronger than Yongkang's farmers. According to the above conclusions, the following suggestions are made: one is to establish and improve the forest rights management system and publish the circulation information. The second is to develop non-agricultural industries and raise farmers' income level. 3. To respect the will of farmers and encourage farmers to carry out forest land circulation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江農(nóng)林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：F326.2;F832.4

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 徐秀英,沈月琴,萬(wàn)剛,徐有銀;林地流轉(zhuǎn)的難點(diǎn)、問(wèn)題與對(duì)策——臨安市林地流轉(zhuǎn)的調(diào)查[J];浙江林業(yè)科技;2000年06期

2 羅運(yùn)森 ,黎志永;加快林地流轉(zhuǎn)步伐 促進(jìn)產(chǎn)業(yè)化進(jìn)程[J];廣西林業(yè);2003年06期

3 康敏卿;贛州市林地流轉(zhuǎn)初探[J];江西林業(yè)科技;2004年04期

4 梁澤治;加強(qiáng)林地流轉(zhuǎn)管理 實(shí)現(xiàn)資源優(yōu)化配置[J];湖南林業(yè);2004年10期

5 梁明蓮 ,江明峻;林地流轉(zhuǎn)的問(wèn)題與對(duì)策[J];廣西林業(yè);2004年05期

6 王飛,萬(wàn)志芳,于志杰;論國(guó)有林地流轉(zhuǎn)的必要性[J];中國(guó)林業(yè)企業(yè);2005年02期

7 樊喜斌;;關(guān)于林地流轉(zhuǎn)問(wèn)題的探討[J];林業(yè)資源管理;2006年04期

8 祝海波;;我國(guó)林地流轉(zhuǎn)機(jī)理及制度思考[J];農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟(jì);2006年12期

9 祝海波;尹少華;;探索適合我國(guó)林地流轉(zhuǎn)的基本制度[J];林業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)問(wèn)題;2006年06期

10 鄧章寧;;海南林地流轉(zhuǎn)存在的問(wèn)題及對(duì)策建議[J];熱帶林業(yè);2007年04期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條

1 張蕾;蔡志堅(jiān);;論林地流轉(zhuǎn)中的制度失衡問(wèn)題[A];第九屆中國(guó)林業(yè)青年學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文摘要集[C];2010年

2 廖文梅;彭泰中;曹建華;;農(nóng)戶林地流轉(zhuǎn)行為影響因素的實(shí)證分析——以江西為例[A];低碳經(jīng)濟(jì)與林業(yè)發(fā)展論——中國(guó)林業(yè)學(xué)術(shù)論壇·第6輯[C];2009年

3 王耀冬;;關(guān)于林地流轉(zhuǎn)問(wèn)題的研究[A];林業(yè)、森林與野生動(dòng)植物資源保護(hù)法制建設(shè)研究——2004年中國(guó)環(huán)境資源法學(xué)研討會(huì)（年會(huì)）論文集（第一冊(cè)）[C];2004年

4 季利民;;林地流轉(zhuǎn)問(wèn)題的研究與探討[A];第二屆浙江中西部科技論壇論文集（第一卷）[C];2005年

5 蔡志堅(jiān);;戶林地流轉(zhuǎn)行為決策過(guò)程模型與假說(shuō)[A];第九屆中國(guó)林業(yè)青年學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文摘要集[C];2010年

6 孟繁民;張書坤;田林江;;寧安市國(guó)有林場(chǎng)林地流轉(zhuǎn)的思考[A];黑龍江省林業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)會(huì)2004年年會(huì)暨第四次學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)論文集[C];2004年

7 盛建峰;劉金龍;駱耀峰;;林地流轉(zhuǎn)糾紛的成因與思考——廣西壯族自治區(qū)南寧橫縣的調(diào)研報(bào)告[A];第九屆中國(guó)林業(yè)青年學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文摘要集[C];2010年

8 孟凡民;李忠義;;寧安市國(guó)有森林林木林地流轉(zhuǎn)試點(diǎn)工作初報(bào)[A];第九屆中國(guó)林業(yè)青年學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文摘要集[C];2010年

9 杜群;王兆平;;集體林權(quán)改革中林地流轉(zhuǎn)規(guī)范的沖突與協(xié)調(diào)[A];生態(tài)文明與林業(yè)法治--2010全國(guó)環(huán)境資源法學(xué)研討會(huì)（年會(huì)）論文集（上冊(cè)）[C];2010年

10 曹蘭芳;羅攀柱;任偉琳;;林地流轉(zhuǎn)中林地使用權(quán)問(wèn)題及對(duì)策[A];中國(guó)林業(yè)技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì)理論與實(shí)踐[C];2006年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 陳作華 申有全;林地流轉(zhuǎn)催發(fā)我市造林生機(jī)[N];焦作日?qǐng)?bào);2006年

2 通訊員 賀劍平;任振鶴到團(tuán)風(fēng)麻城督辦林地流轉(zhuǎn)工作[N];黃岡日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

3 記者 梁堅(jiān)義邋實(shí)習(xí)生 陳攀 馬先軍;新政策助陽(yáng)新林地流轉(zhuǎn)[N];黃石日?qǐng)?bào);2008年

4 記者 成良田邋通訊員 李雪誠(chéng);楊芳林林地流轉(zhuǎn)緊鑼密鼓[N];咸寧日?qǐng)?bào);2008年

5 特約記者 任建成　通訊員 龍朝輝;嘉魚：林地流轉(zhuǎn)3萬(wàn)多畝[N];咸寧日?qǐng)?bào);2008年

6 記者 成良田　見習(xí)記者 朱哲;我市部署林地流轉(zhuǎn)工作[N];咸寧日?qǐng)?bào);2008年

7 通訊員 閔勁華;赤壁：農(nóng)民林地流轉(zhuǎn)得實(shí)惠[N];咸寧日?qǐng)?bào);2008年

8 阮鳳文 本報(bào)記者 劉鳳娟;寧安敲響林地流轉(zhuǎn)“第一槌”[N];黑龍江經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2008年

9 本報(bào)記者 朱邪;審議并原則通過(guò)《貴州省森林、林木、林地流轉(zhuǎn)條例(草案)》[N];貴州日?qǐng)?bào);2010年

10 記者 郭樹勛;龍翔街道：林地流轉(zhuǎn)多[N];焦作日?qǐng)?bào);2010年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 冉陸榮;集體林權(quán)制度改革背景下遼寧省農(nóng)戶林地流轉(zhuǎn)行為及經(jīng)營(yíng)效率研究[D];沈陽(yáng)農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 楊松坤;農(nóng)戶林地流轉(zhuǎn)行為實(shí)證研究[D];浙江農(nóng)林大學(xué);2010年

2 鄭云青;江西省集體林地流轉(zhuǎn)中的農(nóng)戶決策行為與政策優(yōu)化研究[D];江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2012年

3 李朝柱;農(nóng)戶林地流轉(zhuǎn)及對(duì)家庭收入的影響研究[D];浙江農(nóng)林大學(xué);2012年

4 趙娜;林地流轉(zhuǎn)對(duì)農(nóng)戶林地投入的影響研究[D];浙江農(nóng)林大學(xué);2012年

5 徐林青;江西省銅鼓縣集體林地流轉(zhuǎn)市場(chǎng)結(jié)構(gòu)及成因分析[D];北京林業(yè)大學(xué);2015年

6 劉大鵬;不同地區(qū)林地流轉(zhuǎn)影響因素的比較研究[D];北京林業(yè)大學(xué);2015年

7 嚴(yán)俊;南方集體林區(qū)林地流轉(zhuǎn)研究[D];南京林業(yè)大學(xué);2010年

8 趙海蘭;云南省民族地區(qū)集體林權(quán)改革后的林地流轉(zhuǎn)研究[D];西南林業(yè)大學(xué);2013年

9 李紅慶;南方集體林可持續(xù)經(jīng)營(yíng)林地流轉(zhuǎn)政策與機(jī)制研究[D];中南林業(yè)科技大學(xué);2009年

10 王飛;國(guó)有林地流轉(zhuǎn)研究[D];東北林業(yè)大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號(hào)：2267439