本文選題：農(nóng)民市民化 + 市民化障礙��； 參考：《四川省社會科學(xué)院》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：農(nóng)民市民化問題是當(dāng)前中國快速工業(yè)化和城市化進程中的一個重大問題。由于技術(shù)進步的作用,農(nóng)業(yè)生產(chǎn)力得到極大的提高,農(nóng)業(yè)中開始出現(xiàn)農(nóng)業(yè)剩余勞動力,劉易斯二元經(jīng)濟模型以及其他的人口流動理論可以對中國經(jīng)濟發(fā)展中的人口流動進行不同程度的解釋。在改革開放之后,在城市吸引力和農(nóng)業(yè)推力的作用下,農(nóng)業(yè)剩余勞動力開始向城市轉(zhuǎn)移,農(nóng)民開始由農(nóng)業(yè)向二三產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移。一方面,農(nóng)民進城在定居、身份轉(zhuǎn)變方面面臨一系列挑戰(zhàn)性問題,這是異地農(nóng)民市民化問題。另一種農(nóng)民市民化問題是被征地農(nóng)民的市民化問題,即本地市民化問題�？傮w上,農(nóng)民市民化的行為選擇仍然是基于理性人假設(shè),農(nóng)民市民化面臨成本和收益問題,面臨制度性的障礙和非制度性的障礙等約束條件,農(nóng)民市民化的選擇行為就是要在這些約束條件下實現(xiàn)效用最大化。本文著重從戶籍、土地、社會保障等制度性因素和人力資本質(zhì)量、技能、心理、成本等非制度性因素分析農(nóng)民市民化的障礙因素。不論是異地市民化、本地市民化,還是主動市民化、被動市民化,農(nóng)民市民化過程目前均體現(xiàn)出半市民化的特征,完全跨越制度性和非制度性的六大障礙因素:戶籍、土地、社會保障、市民化素質(zhì)、心理、成本等障礙而成為真正市民的人還相對有限。本文運用行為選擇模型對不同類型農(nóng)民市民化的案例進行分析,找出不同類型農(nóng)民市民化的具體約束條件。在分析市民化障礙的基礎(chǔ)之上建構(gòu)農(nóng)民市民化的動力機制;重點從制度完善、技術(shù)進步、發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略優(yōu)化三個維度進行構(gòu)建。本文通過文獻綜述、農(nóng)民市民化案例分析、宏觀數(shù)據(jù)分析,總結(jié)出農(nóng)民市民化的路徑優(yōu)化選擇,并刻畫出農(nóng)民市民化路徑圖。最后,本文認為,縣域市民化是我國新型城鎮(zhèn)化背景下農(nóng)民工市民化的重要方向。合理調(diào)整農(nóng)民變市民的區(qū)域空間重點,給予縣城發(fā)展更大力度的政策支持,中國農(nóng)民工市民化將實現(xiàn)更低成本和更高效率,進而推動農(nóng)民工市民化更加規(guī)范有序的向前推進。
[Abstract]:The urbanization of farmers is an important problem in the process of rapid industrialization and urbanization in China.As a result of technological progress, agricultural productivity has been greatly improved, and agricultural surplus labor is beginning to appear in agriculture.Lewis dual economic model and other theories of population mobility can explain the population flow in China's economic development to varying degrees.After the reform and opening up, under the influence of urban attraction and agricultural thrust, the surplus agricultural labor force began to transfer to the city, and the farmers began to transfer from agriculture to the second and third industries.On the one hand, farmers face a series of challenging problems in settling down and changing their identity in cities, which is a problem of farmerization.Another kind of farmer's citizen problem is the land expropriated farmer's citizen question, namely the local citizen question.On the whole, the behavior choice of farmers' citizenship is still based on the assumption of rational people, the peasants' urbanization faces the problems of cost and income, the constraints of institutional and non-institutional barriers, and so on.The choice of farmers'citizenship is to maximize utility under these constraints.This paper focuses on the institutional factors, such as household registration, land, social security, and other non-institutional factors such as human capital quality, skills, psychology, cost and so on.At present, the process of urbanization, whether it is local, local, active, passive or peasant, embodies the characteristics of semi-urbanization, completely surmounting the six obstacles of institutional and non-institutional: household registration, land, and so on.Social security, civic quality, psychology, cost and other obstacles and become a real citizen is relatively limited.In this paper, the behavior selection model is used to analyze the cases of different types of farmers' urbanization, and the specific constraints of different types of farmers' urbanization are found out.On the basis of analyzing the obstacles of urbanization, this paper constructs the dynamic mechanism of farmers' urbanization, focusing on the three dimensions of system perfection, technological progress and development strategy optimization.Through literature review, case analysis of farmers' urbanization and macro data analysis, this paper sums up the path optimization choice of farmers' citizenship, and depicts the path map of farmers' urbanization.Finally, this paper holds that county citizenship is an important direction of peasant laborer citizenship under the background of new urbanization in our country.By rationally adjusting the regional spatial emphasis of the peasants and giving greater policy support to the development of the county towns, the urbanization of migrant workers in China will realize lower cost and higher efficiency, and then push forward the urbanization of migrant workers in a more standardized and orderly manner.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：四川省社會科學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D422.6;F323.6

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 許抄軍;陳四輝;王亞新;;非正式制度視角的農(nóng)民工市民化意愿及障礙——以湛江市為例[J];經(jīng)濟地理;2015年12期

2 王景新;;中國農(nóng)村發(fā)展新階段:村域城鎮(zhèn)化[J];中國農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟;2015年10期

3 王增文;鄧大松;;農(nóng)村家庭風(fēng)險測度及風(fēng)險抵御和防范機制研究——兼論農(nóng)村社會保障制度抵御風(fēng)險的有效性[J];中國軟科學(xué);2015年07期

4 程云蕾;;論我國農(nóng)民工市民化現(xiàn)狀及時代特征[J];農(nóng)業(yè)經(jīng)濟;2015年04期

5 黃錕;;城鄉(xiāng)二元制度對農(nóng)民工市民化進程的影響與制度創(chuàng)新[J];經(jīng)濟研究參考;2014年08期

6 黃錕;;解決農(nóng)民工問題的根本途徑和基本條件[J];經(jīng)濟體制改革;2011年05期

7 左學(xué)金;;我國進城農(nóng)民工市民化模式探討[J];西部論壇;2011年01期

8 李永友;徐楠;;個體特征、制度性因素與失地農(nóng)民市民化——基于浙江省富陽等地調(diào)查數(shù)據(jù)的實證考察[J];管理世界;2011年01期

9 蔡f ;;人口轉(zhuǎn)變、人口紅利與劉易斯轉(zhuǎn)折點[J];經(jīng)濟研究;2010年04期

10 謝燦城;;城市化視角下的“城中村”現(xiàn)象分析[J];現(xiàn)代城市研究;2009年12期

，

本文編號：1739888