本文關(guān)鍵詞： 社會資本 農(nóng)戶脫貧 資源俘獲　出處：《經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)動態(tài)》2017年04期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：基于2006年中國綜合社會調(diào)查(CGSS)的農(nóng)村微觀數(shù)據(jù),本文利用消除區(qū)域物價(jià)差異和家庭規(guī)模經(jīng)濟(jì)的方法識別貧困人口,利用國家扶貧開發(fā)工作重點(diǎn)縣(國貧縣)與非國貧縣的扶貧政策差異研究了社會資本對農(nóng)戶脫貧的異質(zhì)性影響及微觀機(jī)制。研究發(fā)現(xiàn):國貧縣農(nóng)村貧困人口的社會資本脫貧效應(yīng)顯著高于非國貧縣,進(jìn)一步的機(jī)制檢驗(yàn)表明這種差別可能來源于我國扶貧開發(fā)瞄準(zhǔn)國貧縣背景下,國貧縣社會資本更強(qiáng)的資源俘獲效應(yīng)。文章還考察了社會資本脫貧效應(yīng)的異質(zhì)性,發(fā)現(xiàn)政府相關(guān)和本地社會資本的脫貧效應(yīng)更強(qiáng)。
[Abstract]:Based on the rural micro-data of China Comprehensive Social Survey (CGSS2006), this paper uses the method of eliminating regional price difference and household scale economy to identify the poor population. This paper studies the heterogeneity and microcosmic mechanism of social capital on the poverty alleviation of peasant households by using the differences of poverty alleviation policies between the key counties (national poor counties) and non-state poor counties. The study finds that: the society of poor rural population in poor counties is the society of rural poor people in poor counties of China. The anti-poverty effect of capital is significantly higher than that of non-poor counties. Further mechanism tests show that this difference may be due to the stronger resource capture effect of social capital in poor counties under the background of poverty alleviation and development in China, and the heterogeneity of poverty eradication effects of social capital is also investigated in this paper. It is found that the effect of government-related and local social capital is stronger.
【作者單位】： 南開大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)與社會發(fā)展研究院;中國人民大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院區(qū)域與城市經(jīng)濟(jì)研究所;
【分類號】：F323.5
，

本文編號：1551068