本文選題：合并會(huì)計(jì)報(bào)表 + 合并會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則��； 參考：《河南理工大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化的發(fā)展，會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則顯得越來(lái)越重要，其中，最為重要的是會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則的國(guó)際趨同。2006年我國(guó)新企業(yè)會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則的發(fā)布，標(biāo)志著我國(guó)會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則的國(guó)際趨同，其中《企業(yè)會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則第20號(hào)——企業(yè)合并》和《企業(yè)會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則第33號(hào)——合并財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表》在全面考慮我國(guó)國(guó)情的基礎(chǔ)上，總結(jié)企業(yè)合并和合并會(huì)計(jì)報(bào)表會(huì)計(jì)處理規(guī)定的得失，順應(yīng)了國(guó)際化趨同的大趨勢(shì)，它充分考慮了我國(guó)國(guó)情，區(qū)分企業(yè)合并類型；按修訂后的實(shí)體理論作為編制合并會(huì)計(jì)報(bào)表的理論基礎(chǔ)；在會(huì)計(jì)計(jì)量中添加公允價(jià)值，，增加信息的有用性。新合并會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則的實(shí)施，促進(jìn)了我國(guó)企業(yè)合并的發(fā)展，但我國(guó)合并會(huì)計(jì)發(fā)展較晚，在理論和實(shí)務(wù)中還存在一些問(wèn)題，需要進(jìn)一步完善。 本文首先對(duì)合并會(huì)計(jì)報(bào)表的相關(guān)理論進(jìn)行比較分析，其中包括國(guó)際、美國(guó)和我國(guó)合并會(huì)計(jì)發(fā)展的比較；對(duì)合并會(huì)計(jì)報(bào)表的三大合并理論和合并方法進(jìn)行比較，突出每個(gè)理論和方法的特點(diǎn)。然后，對(duì)《國(guó)際會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則第27號(hào)——合并及單獨(dú)財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表》（IAS27）和我國(guó)《企業(yè)會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則第33號(hào)——合并財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表》（CAS33）進(jìn)行了較為全面的比較，CAS33在母公司豁免編報(bào)合并報(bào)表、商譽(yù)減值等方面有待完善。接著，對(duì)兗州煤業(yè)執(zhí)行CAS33和IAS27的情況進(jìn)行案例研究，其研究結(jié)論為完善CAS18提供了依據(jù)。最后，在我國(guó)和國(guó)際準(zhǔn)則比較的基礎(chǔ)上，模擬一個(gè)母子公司，進(jìn)行案例分析，突出我國(guó)和國(guó)際合并會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則的差異對(duì)合并會(huì)計(jì)報(bào)表核心數(shù)據(jù)的影響。 2007年我國(guó)開(kāi)始實(shí)施新會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則，到2010年已經(jīng)有三年時(shí)間，這期間我國(guó)上市公司嚴(yán)格按照CAS33的規(guī)定編制合并會(huì)計(jì)報(bào)表。本文考察了我國(guó)上市公司2010年執(zhí)行CAS33的情況，在執(zhí)行過(guò)程中查找CAS33存在的問(wèn)題。并根據(jù)CAS33存在的問(wèn)題，進(jìn)一步提出了完善CAS33和加強(qiáng)CAS18執(zhí)行力度的建議和措施，以期促進(jìn)我國(guó)合并會(huì)計(jì)的發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:With the development of economic globalization, accounting standards are becoming more and more important, among which, the most important is the international convergence of accounting standards. Among them, Enterprise Accounting Standard No. 20-Enterprise merger "and Enterprise Accounting Standard No. 33-Consolidated Financial statement", on the basis of overall consideration of our country's national conditions, summed up the gains and losses of the accounting treatment provisions for enterprise consolidation and consolidated accounting statements, Conforming to the trend of internationalization convergence, it fully considers the national conditions of our country, distinguishes the type of enterprise merger, takes the revised entity theory as the theoretical basis for compiling consolidated accounting statements, and adds fair value to the accounting measurement. Increase the usefulness of information. The implementation of new accounting standards for merger has promoted the development of enterprise merger in our country, but the development of merger accounting in our country is relatively late. There are still some problems in theory and practice, which need to be further improved. Firstly, this paper makes a comparative analysis of the related theories of consolidated accounting statements, including the comparison of international, American and Chinese consolidated accounting development, and compares the three merger theories and methods of consolidated accounting statements. Highlight the characteristics of each theory and method. Then, the comparison between IAS27 (International Accounting Standard No. 27) and CAS33 (Consolidated Financial statement for Enterprises) is made. CAS33 exempts the parent company from preparing consolidated statements. Goodwill impairment and other aspects need to be improved. Then, the case study of Yanzhou coal industry implementing CAS33 and IAS27 is carried out, and the conclusion provides the basis for improving CAS18. Finally, on the basis of the comparison between China and international standards, we simulate a parent and subsidiary company to carry out a case study. Highlight the impact of differences between Chinese and international consolidated accounting standards on the core data of consolidated accounting statements. In 2007, China began to implement the new accounting standards, and it has been three years since 2010. During this period, China's listed companies strictly in accordance with the provisions of CAS 33 to prepare consolidated accounting statements. This paper examines the implementation of CAS33 in China's listed companies in 2010, and finds out the problems existing in CAS33. According to the existing problems of CAS33, the author puts forward some suggestions and measures to improve CAS33 and strengthen the enforcement of CAS18 in order to promote the development of consolidated accounting in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河南理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：F275.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 戴德明;毛新述;姚淑瑜;;合并報(bào)表與母公司報(bào)表的有用性:理論分析與經(jīng)驗(yàn)檢驗(yàn)[J];會(huì)計(jì)研究;2006年10期

2 王鵬;陳武朝;;合并財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表的價(jià)值相關(guān)性研究[J];會(huì)計(jì)研究;2009年05期

3 楊敏;陸建橋;徐華新;;當(dāng)前國(guó)際會(huì)計(jì)趨同形勢(shì)和我國(guó)企業(yè)會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則國(guó)際趨同的策略選擇[J];會(huì)計(jì)研究;2011年10期

4 ;企業(yè)會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則第33號(hào)——合并財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表[J];會(huì)計(jì)之友;2006年12期

5 韋志余;徐祥強(qiáng);;中美企業(yè)合并會(huì)計(jì)報(bào)表的差異及啟示[J];現(xiàn)代金融;2007年05期

6 周在鳳;;合并財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表合并范圍的國(guó)際比較[J];綠色財(cái)會(huì);2007年09期

7 王北軍;;淺析合并財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表中調(diào)整分錄的編制[J];財(cái)會(huì)研究;2010年22期

8 宋茜;;關(guān)于合并財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表合并范圍的中外比較探析[J];財(cái)會(huì)研究;2011年23期

9 楊海蓉;;中外合并財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表編制實(shí)務(wù)比較[J];中國(guó)管理信息化(會(huì)計(jì)版);2007年07期

10 李金龍;路明明;亓桂娟;;案例分析編制合并報(bào)表中存貨賬務(wù)處理的相關(guān)問(wèn)題[J];網(wǎng)絡(luò)財(cái)富;2010年16期

本文編號(hào)：2094846