本文選題：會(huì)計(jì)師事務(wù)所　切入點(diǎn)：新三板　出處：《江蘇大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：新三板是我國(guó)第一家公司制的全國(guó)性證券交易場(chǎng)所。證監(jiān)會(huì)多次開(kāi)會(huì)發(fā)文,敦促新三板在我國(guó)資本市場(chǎng)的發(fā)展。在新三板掛牌過(guò)程中必不可少的財(cái)務(wù)盡職調(diào)查活動(dòng)也得到越來(lái)越多人的了解。會(huì)計(jì)師事務(wù)所作為執(zhí)行財(cái)務(wù)盡職調(diào)查的主體,關(guān)于新三板財(cái)務(wù)盡職調(diào)查的業(yè)務(wù)量自然有所增加,會(huì)計(jì)師事務(wù)所也在積極儲(chǔ)備項(xiàng)目資源,但隨著審查日趨嚴(yán)格,想要成功掛牌新三板也愈發(fā)困難,當(dāng)企業(yè)付出了相應(yīng)成本,最終卻無(wú)任何回報(bào)未掛牌成功時(shí),會(huì)對(duì)企業(yè)造成消極影響。財(cái)務(wù)盡職調(diào)查具備發(fā)現(xiàn)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)和確認(rèn)是否符合掛牌條件兩個(gè)作用,在實(shí)際的工作中,會(huì)計(jì)師事務(wù)所普遍存在對(duì)財(cái)務(wù)盡職調(diào)查重視程度不足的問(wèn)題,財(cái)務(wù)盡職調(diào)查的失效會(huì)使一些在新三板掛牌之前并未對(duì)自身的發(fā)展有正確估值的企業(yè),掛牌項(xiàng)目夭折,甚至可能導(dǎo)致企業(yè)破產(chǎn)。為了從源頭上改善這一情況,本文對(duì)A會(huì)計(jì)師事務(wù)所財(cái)務(wù)盡職調(diào)查的有效性進(jìn)行研究,以個(gè)案歸納出A事務(wù)所財(cái)務(wù)盡職調(diào)查工作是否有效的一般理論。首先,本文綜述財(cái)務(wù)盡職調(diào)查相關(guān)理論基礎(chǔ),運(yùn)用文獻(xiàn)綜述法與案例分析法這兩種研究方法,分析新三板擬掛牌企業(yè)財(cái)務(wù)盡職調(diào)查的有效性,從財(cái)務(wù)信息真實(shí)性調(diào)查的有效性、掛牌資格調(diào)查的有效性、未來(lái)成長(zhǎng)性調(diào)查的有效性這三個(gè)維度,對(duì)A事務(wù)所財(cái)務(wù)盡職調(diào)查有效性進(jìn)行評(píng)價(jià),通過(guò)A事務(wù)所對(duì)B公司的財(cái)務(wù)盡職調(diào)查分析,發(fā)現(xiàn)影響A事務(wù)所財(cái)務(wù)盡職調(diào)查有效性的因素主要有行業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)壓力大、調(diào)查人員的專業(yè)能力參差不齊、質(zhì)量控制程序不完善和目標(biāo)公司不配合,并運(yùn)用博弈論相關(guān)知識(shí)對(duì)財(cái)務(wù)盡職調(diào)查項(xiàng)目組和目標(biāo)公司就雙方詳細(xì)調(diào)查和粗略調(diào)查以及坦白和隱瞞的策略選擇進(jìn)行博弈分析,得出雙方的最優(yōu)選擇,最后,對(duì)A事務(wù)所目前存在的問(wèn)題提出相應(yīng)建議以期望提高A會(huì)計(jì)師事務(wù)所財(cái)務(wù)盡職調(diào)查有效性。在實(shí)際的新三板項(xiàng)目工作中,由于每個(gè)擬掛牌企業(yè)都有其特殊性,應(yīng)該做到具體問(wèn)題具體分析,依據(jù)目標(biāo)公司的實(shí)際情況,設(shè)計(jì)財(cái)務(wù)盡職調(diào)查方案,簡(jiǎn)單、有效地開(kāi)展財(cái)務(wù)盡職調(diào)查,做好擬掛牌企業(yè)財(cái)務(wù)盡職調(diào)查工作。
[Abstract]:New third board is our country's first company system of the national securities exchange.Securities Regulatory Commission has repeatedly issued papers urging the development of the new third board in China's capital market.The necessary financial due diligence activities in the new three-board listing process have also been more and more understood.Accounting firms, as the main body of financial due diligence, have naturally increased the volume of financial due diligence on the new three boards. Accounting firms are also actively reserving project resources, but as the scrutiny becomes more and more stringent,It is more and more difficult to successfully list the new third board, when the enterprise pays the corresponding cost, but does not have any return in the end, it will have a negative impact on the enterprise.Financial due diligence has two roles: finding risks and confirming whether they meet the listing conditions. In the actual work, accounting firms generally have the problem of insufficient attention to financial due diligence.The failure of financial due diligence will cause some companies that do not have a correct valuation of their own development before the new third board listing, the listing project will collapse, and may even lead to bankruptcy.In order to improve this situation from the source, this paper studies the validity of financial due diligence in A accounting firm, and sums up the general theory of whether financial due diligence is effective in A firm by case study.First of all, this paper summarizes the theoretical basis of financial due diligence, using literature review method and case analysis method to analyze the effectiveness of financial due diligence of new three boards to be listed, from the financial information authenticity investigation effectiveness.This paper evaluates the validity of financial due diligence of firm A through the analysis of financial due diligence of company B through the three dimensions of the validity of listed qualification investigation and the effectiveness of future growth investigation.It is found that the main factors influencing the effectiveness of financial due diligence in firm A are the industry competition pressure, the uneven professional ability of the investigators, the imperfect quality control procedures and the lack of cooperation among the target companies.And use the game theory related knowledge to the financial due diligence project group and the target company to carry on the game analysis to both sides detailed investigation and the rough investigation as well as the frank and concealing strategy choice, obtains the both sides the best choice, finally,In order to improve the financial due diligence effectiveness of A accounting firm, this paper puts forward the corresponding suggestions to the problems existing in firm A.In the actual work of the new third board project, because each enterprise to be listed has its particularity, it should be done specific analysis of the specific problems, according to the actual situation of the target company, design the financial due diligence scheme, simple,Carry out financial due diligence effectively and do well financial due diligence work for listed enterprises.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：江蘇大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F832.51;F233

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 鐘建華;;企業(yè)股權(quán)交易過(guò)程中財(cái)務(wù)、稅務(wù)盡職調(diào)查的幾點(diǎn)思考[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)師;2017年02期

2 楊松;;企業(yè)并購(gòu)中財(cái)務(wù)盡職調(diào)查存在的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)控制[J];財(cái)會(huì)學(xué)習(xí);2016年23期

3 蘇基平;;淺談財(cái)務(wù)盡職調(diào)查基礎(chǔ)下的新三板項(xiàng)目風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理[J];會(huì)計(jì)師;2016年23期

4 楊陽(yáng);;基于利益相關(guān)者博弈分析的審計(jì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)行為研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)地理;2016年10期

5 步永欣;;并購(gòu)前盡職調(diào)查及風(fēng)險(xiǎn)分析[J];會(huì)計(jì)師;2016年20期

6 鄧元秀;;會(huì)計(jì)師財(cái)務(wù)盡職調(diào)查之我見(jiàn)[J];財(cái)經(jīng)界(學(xué)術(shù)版);2016年16期

7 王倩;;防范風(fēng)險(xiǎn) 優(yōu)化盡職調(diào)查流程的思考[J];商業(yè)會(huì)計(jì);2016年16期

8 聶建偉;;上市公司重組并購(gòu)盡職調(diào)查的研究[J];中國(guó)總會(huì)計(jì)師;2016年08期

9 陳仟子;;并購(gòu)業(yè)務(wù)盡職調(diào)查問(wèn)題[J];中國(guó)金融;2016年13期

10 田永;;淺議企業(yè)并購(gòu)財(cái)務(wù)盡職調(diào)查實(shí)施[J];中國(guó)內(nèi)部審計(jì);2016年06期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前9條

1 梁攀;H證券公司新三板企業(yè)掛牌審查要素研究[D];南京大學(xué);2016年

2 吳忠羽;H會(huì)計(jì)師事務(wù)所的審計(jì)質(zhì)量控制研究[D];安徽大學(xué);2016年

3 郎天宇;會(huì)計(jì)師事務(wù)所審計(jì)質(zhì)量控制體系研究[D];河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué);2016年

4 劉蕊;會(huì)計(jì)師事務(wù)所審計(jì)質(zhì)量評(píng)價(jià)體系研究[D];云南大學(xué);2015年

5 趙沫;會(huì)計(jì)師事務(wù)所并購(gòu)財(cái)務(wù)盡職調(diào)查的改進(jìn)與優(yōu)化研究[D];蘭州大學(xué);2015年

6 李文浩;基于財(cái)務(wù)盡職調(diào)查的新三板項(xiàng)目風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2015年

7 程肖田;會(huì)計(jì)師事務(wù)所財(cái)務(wù)盡職調(diào)查業(yè)務(wù)芻議[D];財(cái)政部財(cái)政科學(xué)研究所;2014年

8 王海平;私募股權(quán)投資下的財(cái)務(wù)盡職調(diào)查研究[D];廣西大學(xué);2012年

9 趙伯生;財(cái)務(wù)盡職調(diào)查流程及內(nèi)容研究[D];北京郵電大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：1713671