本文關鍵詞：基于代理問題的高管期權激勵對資本結構動態(tài)調整的影響研究　出處：《吉林大學》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

  更多相關文章： 高管期權激勵 資本結構調整 股權集中度 兩職合一

【摘要】：自現(xiàn)代企業(yè)誕生以來,委托代理問題一直是公司治理理論中的討論核心。改善所有者與代理人之間的利益目標不一致問題是解決委托代理問題的必要環(huán)節(jié),因此股權激勵歷來被視為解決委托代理問題的有效工具。在股權激勵計劃中大多數(shù)企業(yè)選擇了股票期權激勵方式,這種方式使得所有者和代理人之間的利益目標相趨同,促使經(jīng)營者真正從企業(yè)發(fā)展和股東利益的角度出發(fā)來努力工作。它能夠促使管理層調整企業(yè)資本結構,以實現(xiàn)企業(yè)價值最大化目標;但其造成的管理者利用職權謀取私利的現(xiàn)象屢見不鮮又使得人們對激勵效果存疑。本文結合了股票期權激勵與資本結構動態(tài)調整兩方面的內容,以及股權集中度、兩職合一對二者的調節(jié)作用,以期為我國股票期權激勵實踐提供一定的理論支持。本文首先闡述了股票期權激勵與資本結構理論的研究背景和研究意義,并對以往相關研究結論進行回顧;其次,界定了股票期權激勵和資本結構的概念內涵,并對本文所應用的期權價值理論、權衡理論、委托代理理論進行了細致闡述;再次,基于文獻綜述和理論回顧提出了本文的假設,實證檢驗了股票期權激勵的實施對資本結構調整速度的影響;最后,分析了本文的研究結論,并提出五條基于實踐層面的建議。本文的主要研究結論如下:第一,股票期權激勵計劃的實施在一定程度上提高了資本結構調整成本,加大了調整資本結構的困難程度,增加了實際資本結構與目標資本結構之間的距離。第二,股權較為集中時,期權激勵對資本結構調整速度的抑制程度減弱;而股權較為分散時,會增強這種負向影響。第三,當總經(jīng)理和董事長為一人時,會加強期權激勵對資本結構的調整速度的負向影響;當總經(jīng)理和董事長分任情況時,期權激勵對資本結構動態(tài)調整速度的抑制程度減弱。第四,企業(yè)規(guī)模、成長性、盈利性、資產(chǎn)擔保價值以及賬面市值比均會對企業(yè)的資本結構調整行為產(chǎn)生影響,而且影響效果具有一定的穩(wěn)健性。總之,本文的研究結果表明,股票期權激勵的實施對資本結構調整的作用逐漸顯現(xiàn),但在執(zhí)行過程中仍不可避免地存在一些問題。通過改善資本市場環(huán)境、規(guī)范信息披露、增強內部監(jiān)督等手段,才能確保股票期權激勵對資本結構調整的正面積極作用。
[Abstract]:Since the birth of modern enterprises, the principal-agent problem has been the core of the theory of corporate governance. Therefore, equity incentive has always been regarded as an effective tool to solve the principal-agent problem. In this way, the interests of owners and agents converge, and the managers work hard from the perspective of the development of the enterprise and the interests of the shareholders, and it can promote the management to adjust the capital structure of the enterprise. To realize the goal of maximizing enterprise value; However, the phenomenon that managers make use of their power to seek private interests is common and makes people doubt the incentive effect. This paper combines the two aspects of stock option incentive and dynamic adjustment of capital structure. As well as the ownership concentration, the two positions in one of the two of the regulatory role of the two. In order to provide some theoretical support for the practice of stock option incentive in China. Firstly, this paper expounds the research background and significance of stock option incentive and capital structure theory, and reviews the previous relevant research conclusions. Secondly, it defines the concept connotation of stock option incentive and capital structure, and elaborates the option value theory, trade-off theory and principal-agent theory applied in this paper. Thirdly, based on the literature review and theoretical review, this paper puts forward the hypothesis, and empirically tests the impact of the implementation of stock option incentive on the speed of capital structure adjustment; Finally, this paper analyzes the conclusions of this paper, and puts forward five suggestions based on practice. The main conclusions of this paper are as follows: first. To a certain extent, the implementation of stock option incentive plan increases the cost of capital structure adjustment, increases the difficulty of adjusting capital structure, and increases the distance between actual capital structure and target capital structure. When the equity is concentrated, the inhibition degree of option incentive on the speed of capital structure adjustment is weakened. Third, when the general manager and chairman are one person, the negative effect of option incentive on the speed of capital structure adjustment will be strengthened. When the general manager and the chairman of the board of directors are divided, the inhibition of option incentive on the speed of dynamic adjustment of capital structure is weakened. 4th, enterprise size, growth, and profitability. Asset guarantee value and book market value ratio will have an impact on the corporate capital structure adjustment behavior, and the effect has a certain robustness. In short, the results of this paper show that. The effect of stock option incentive on the adjustment of capital structure appears gradually, but there are still some unavoidable problems in the process of implementation. Through improving the capital market environment, we can standardize the information disclosure. Only by strengthening internal supervision can we ensure the positive effect of stock option incentive on the adjustment of capital structure.
【學位授予單位】：吉林大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F275;F832.51

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 李萌萌;;我國上市公司股權激勵問題研究——基于康得新公司的案例分析[J];知識經(jīng)濟;2017年02期

2 盛明泉;張春強;王燁;;高管股權激勵與資本結構動態(tài)調整[J];會計研究;2016年02期

3 胡建雄;茅寧;;國外資本結構調整研究述評及展望[J];外國經(jīng)濟與管理;2014年08期

4 姜付秀;黃繼承;;市場化進程與資本結構動態(tài)調整[J];管理世界;2011年03期

5 鄭鳴;徐璐;;中國上市公司期權激勵的影響因素分析[J];軟科學;2010年10期

6 鐘有兒;馬廣奇;;中國股票期權激勵的有效性分析[J];商業(yè)經(jīng)濟;2010年03期

7 孟科學;;公司高管薪酬與融資結構間的內生關系[J];中南財經(jīng)政法大學學報;2009年05期

8 熊海斌;謝茂拾;;基于“規(guī)則性不當利益”的經(jīng)理股票期權制度亟需改革[J];管理世界;2009年09期

9 徐國華;;公司股票期權激勵機制探討[J];遼寧經(jīng)濟;2008年03期

10 李雙燕;萬迪f ;徐細雄;;經(jīng)理人股票期權主觀價值研究及啟示[J];外國經(jīng)濟與管理;2007年06期

，

本文編號：1441340