基于生態(tài)足跡的中國農(nóng)產(chǎn)品貿(mào)易可持續(xù)發(fā)展研究
發(fā)布時間：2019-06-13 20:35
【摘要】：國際貿(mào)易自由化程度不斷提高，發(fā)達國家逐漸開始了自然資源和環(huán)境服務的進口。農(nóng)產(chǎn)品貿(mào)易已不僅僅是物物交換，更值得關注的是生態(tài)資本和環(huán)境空間的轉移。 改革開放以來，我國農(nóng)產(chǎn)品貿(mào)易不斷發(fā)展，特別是加入世貿(mào)組織以來發(fā)展迅速。2012年，我國成為第三大農(nóng)產(chǎn)品貿(mào)易國，農(nóng)產(chǎn)品貿(mào)易總額為1756.6億美元。2004年中國農(nóng)產(chǎn)品貿(mào)易首次出現(xiàn)逆差，并不斷擴大，2012年貿(mào)易逆差為492.1億美元。日益擴大的貿(mào)易逆差，引起了國家和社會普遍的高度重視。雖然貿(mào)易逆差會一定程度上增加國內(nèi)產(chǎn)品的有效供給，平抑國內(nèi)物價；但同時會對中國農(nóng)產(chǎn)品生產(chǎn)和市場帶來嚴重沖擊，進而阻礙農(nóng)業(yè)生產(chǎn)，挫傷農(nóng)民的積極性，引發(fā)社會不穩(wěn)定因素。再加上的貿(mào)易壁壘不斷升級和農(nóng)產(chǎn)品生產(chǎn)的自然資源和環(huán)境瓶頸，使中國農(nóng)產(chǎn)品貿(mào)易可持續(xù)發(fā)展出現(xiàn)阻礙。 從生態(tài)角度看，，貿(mào)易逆差會輸入國外生態(tài)資本，保護國內(nèi)的生態(tài)環(huán)境，有利于生態(tài)可持續(xù)發(fā)展。中國農(nóng)產(chǎn)品貿(mào)易中生態(tài)要素流的狀況是怎樣的，本文利用貿(mào)易生態(tài)足跡模型分析了1992-2012年中國的農(nóng)產(chǎn)品貿(mào)易的可持續(xù)發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀，并詳細分析了這一階段農(nóng)產(chǎn)品貿(mào)易生態(tài)足跡的態(tài)勢和結構組成，得到結論：（1）農(nóng)產(chǎn)品貿(mào)易由生態(tài)赤字轉生態(tài)盈余，并呈現(xiàn)擴大態(tài)勢。（2）農(nóng)產(chǎn)品貿(mào)易生態(tài)足跡結構不均，但態(tài)勢向好。（3）各類生態(tài)生產(chǎn)性土地的生態(tài)足跡各有特色。耕地生態(tài)足跡凈值前階段赤字嚴重，后階段盈余突出；林地、草地生態(tài)以盈余為主，水域生態(tài)足跡則為凈輸出。 利用生態(tài)效率從經(jīng)濟學和生態(tài)學視角綜合分析了農(nóng)產(chǎn)品貿(mào)易的可持續(xù)發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀，表明出口生態(tài)效率大于進口生態(tài)效率，國外生態(tài)資本的價格相對便宜，傾向于國外生態(tài)足跡輸入�？傮w來講，入世前，經(jīng)濟上可持續(xù)發(fā)展占主導，生態(tài)上缺乏可持續(xù)性，是用生態(tài)成本換取經(jīng)濟利益；入世之后，經(jīng)濟上可持續(xù)發(fā)展困難，生態(tài)上可持續(xù)性較好，是用經(jīng)濟利益換取生態(tài)效益。在貿(mào)易發(fā)展中，應該尋求經(jīng)濟和生態(tài)可持續(xù)發(fā)展的均衡點，更好的促進經(jīng)濟社會和生態(tài)的可持續(xù)發(fā)展。 最后提出政策建議：（1）加強可持續(xù)發(fā)展意識和環(huán)境保護意識的宣傳。（2）轉變貿(mào)易增長方式，重視進口也要重視出口。（3）調(diào)整貿(mào)易產(chǎn)品結構，降低生態(tài)資本流失，促進貿(mào)易協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展。（4）科技興農(nóng)，發(fā)展綠色農(nóng)業(yè)，提高生產(chǎn)效率。（5）提高科技含量，加強管理，應對貿(mào)易壁壘。（6）加強國際合作，實現(xiàn)全球共贏。
[Abstract]:With the increasing degree of international trade liberalization, developed countries have gradually begun to import natural resources and environmental services. Agricultural products trade is not only barter, but also the transfer of ecological capital and environmental space. Since the reform and opening up, China's agricultural trade has continued to develop, especially since China's accession to the WTO. In 2012, China became the third largest agricultural trade country, with a total of US $175.66 billion. In 2004, China's agricultural trade deficit appeared for the first time, and continued to expand, with a trade deficit of US $49.21 billion in 2012. The widening trade deficit has attracted the attention of the state and society. Although the trade deficit will increase the effective supply of domestic products to a certain extent and calm down domestic prices, at the same time, it will have a serious impact on the production and market of agricultural products in China, thus hindering agricultural production, discouraging the enthusiasm of farmers and causing social instability. Coupled with the continuous upgrading of trade barriers and the natural resources and environmental bottlenecks of agricultural products production, the sustainable development of agricultural products trade in China is hindered. From the ecological point of view, the trade deficit will import foreign ecological capital, protect the domestic ecological environment, and is conducive to ecological sustainable development. What is the situation of ecological factor flow in China's agricultural products trade? this paper analyzes the present situation of sustainable development of China's agricultural products trade from 1992 to 2012 by using the trade ecological footprint model, and analyzes in detail the situation and structure of the ecological footprint of agricultural products trade in this stage. The conclusions are as follows: (1) Agricultural products trade changes from ecological deficit to ecological surplus. (2) the structure of ecological footprint of agricultural products trade is uneven, but the situation is better. (3) the ecological footprint of all kinds of ecological productive land has its own characteristics. The deficit of the net ecological footprint of cultivated land was serious in the pre-stage, and the surplus in the later stage was prominent, while the ecological footprint of forest land and grassland was mainly surplus, while the ecological footprint of water area was the net output. This paper analyzes the present situation of sustainable development of agricultural products trade from the perspective of economics and ecology by using ecological efficiency, and shows that the ecological efficiency of export is higher than that of import ecological efficiency, and the price of ecological capital abroad is relatively cheap, which tends to import the ecological footprint of foreign countries. Generally speaking, before China's entry into WTO, economic sustainable development is dominant and ecologically lack of sustainability, which is to exchange ecological costs for economic benefits. After China's entry into WTO, economic sustainable development is difficult and ecological sustainability is good, which is to exchange economic benefits for ecological benefits. In the development of trade, we should seek the equilibrium point of economic and ecological sustainable development, and better promote the sustainable development of economy, society and ecology. Finally, some policy suggestions are put forward: (1) to strengthen the propaganda of sustainable development consciousness and environmental protection consciousness. (2) to change the mode of trade growth, to attach importance to import and export. (3) to adjust the structure of trade products, reduce the loss of ecological capital and promote the coordinated development of trade. (4) to develop agriculture through science and technology, to develop green agriculture and to improve production efficiency. (5) to improve the content of science and technology and strengthen management, Deal with trade barriers. (6) strengthen international cooperation to achieve global win-win.
【學位授予單位】：中國海洋大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：X22;F323.7;F752
本文編號：2498800
[Abstract]:With the increasing degree of international trade liberalization, developed countries have gradually begun to import natural resources and environmental services. Agricultural products trade is not only barter, but also the transfer of ecological capital and environmental space. Since the reform and opening up, China's agricultural trade has continued to develop, especially since China's accession to the WTO. In 2012, China became the third largest agricultural trade country, with a total of US $175.66 billion. In 2004, China's agricultural trade deficit appeared for the first time, and continued to expand, with a trade deficit of US $49.21 billion in 2012. The widening trade deficit has attracted the attention of the state and society. Although the trade deficit will increase the effective supply of domestic products to a certain extent and calm down domestic prices, at the same time, it will have a serious impact on the production and market of agricultural products in China, thus hindering agricultural production, discouraging the enthusiasm of farmers and causing social instability. Coupled with the continuous upgrading of trade barriers and the natural resources and environmental bottlenecks of agricultural products production, the sustainable development of agricultural products trade in China is hindered. From the ecological point of view, the trade deficit will import foreign ecological capital, protect the domestic ecological environment, and is conducive to ecological sustainable development. What is the situation of ecological factor flow in China's agricultural products trade? this paper analyzes the present situation of sustainable development of China's agricultural products trade from 1992 to 2012 by using the trade ecological footprint model, and analyzes in detail the situation and structure of the ecological footprint of agricultural products trade in this stage. The conclusions are as follows: (1) Agricultural products trade changes from ecological deficit to ecological surplus. (2) the structure of ecological footprint of agricultural products trade is uneven, but the situation is better. (3) the ecological footprint of all kinds of ecological productive land has its own characteristics. The deficit of the net ecological footprint of cultivated land was serious in the pre-stage, and the surplus in the later stage was prominent, while the ecological footprint of forest land and grassland was mainly surplus, while the ecological footprint of water area was the net output. This paper analyzes the present situation of sustainable development of agricultural products trade from the perspective of economics and ecology by using ecological efficiency, and shows that the ecological efficiency of export is higher than that of import ecological efficiency, and the price of ecological capital abroad is relatively cheap, which tends to import the ecological footprint of foreign countries. Generally speaking, before China's entry into WTO, economic sustainable development is dominant and ecologically lack of sustainability, which is to exchange ecological costs for economic benefits. After China's entry into WTO, economic sustainable development is difficult and ecological sustainability is good, which is to exchange economic benefits for ecological benefits. In the development of trade, we should seek the equilibrium point of economic and ecological sustainable development, and better promote the sustainable development of economy, society and ecology. Finally, some policy suggestions are put forward: (1) to strengthen the propaganda of sustainable development consciousness and environmental protection consciousness. (2) to change the mode of trade growth, to attach importance to import and export. (3) to adjust the structure of trade products, reduce the loss of ecological capital and promote the coordinated development of trade. (4) to develop agriculture through science and technology, to develop green agriculture and to improve production efficiency. (5) to improve the content of science and technology and strengthen management, Deal with trade barriers. (6) strengthen international cooperation to achieve global win-win.
【學位授予單位】：中國海洋大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：X22;F323.7;F752
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 龔葳;張承中;劉艷華;;西安市能源生態(tài)足跡動態(tài)變化及效應分析[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)科學;2009年16期
2 資樹榮;簡議可持續(xù)貿(mào)易[J];商業(yè)研究;2001年07期
3 蔡海生;肖復明;張學玲;;基于生態(tài)足跡變化的鄱陽湖自然保護區(qū)生態(tài)補償定量分析[J];長江流域資源與環(huán)境;2010年06期
4 張志強,徐中民,程國棟,陳東景;中國西部12省(區(qū)市)的生態(tài)足跡[J];地理學報;2001年05期
5 劉立平;幸新榮;;安徽省外貿(mào)可持續(xù)發(fā)展的路徑選擇[J];國際貿(mào)易問題;2010年06期
6 牛樹海,秦耀辰;區(qū)域可持續(xù)發(fā)展中的生態(tài)空間占用法理論研究[J];河南大學學報(自然科學版);2002年04期
7 陳雪琴;;綠色壁壘與我國農(nóng)產(chǎn)品貿(mào)易的可持續(xù)發(fā)展[J];黑龍江對外經(jīng)貿(mào);2008年03期
8 王忠信;;對環(huán)境壁壘與中國農(nóng)產(chǎn)品出口的可持續(xù)發(fā)展問題研究[J];經(jīng)濟師;2006年09期
9 陳光春;潘忠文;陳玉霞;;廣西農(nóng)產(chǎn)品外貿(mào)可持續(xù)性實證分析——基于生態(tài)足跡的改進模型[J];江西農(nóng)業(yè)大學學報(社會科學版);2011年02期
10 趙曉晨;我國對外貿(mào)易可持續(xù)發(fā)展問題探析[J];南開經(jīng)濟研究;1999年01期
相關博士學位論文 前1條
1 曲艷偉;基于可計算一般均衡模型的中國能源生態(tài)足跡研究[D];遼寧工程技術大學;2012年
本文編號：2498800
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/jingjiguanlilunwen/2498800.html
最近更新
教材專著
