利率市場(chǎng)化與我國(guó)長(zhǎng)期經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的動(dòng)態(tài)一般均衡分析
本文關(guān)鍵詞: 利率市場(chǎng)化 信貸歧視 經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng) CGE模型 出處:《湖南大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文 論文類型:學(xué)位論文
【摘要】:改革開放以來,我國(guó)積極地調(diào)整利率總體水平以及利率結(jié)構(gòu),改善利率管理體制為利率的自由化奠定扎實(shí)的基礎(chǔ)。1993年黨的第十四屆三種全會(huì)第一次提出利率市場(chǎng)化,截止2014年我國(guó)的市場(chǎng)化進(jìn)程已經(jīng)走過約20個(gè)年頭,期間內(nèi)我國(guó)的利率市場(chǎng)化取得了巨大的成就。首先放開了銀行間同業(yè)拆借利率,并于1996年和2007年分別構(gòu)建了Chibor和Shibor,逐步構(gòu)建了市場(chǎng)化的利率體系;隨后通過放開債券利率管制,使得包括國(guó)債、銀行間現(xiàn)券交易以及銀行間回購(gòu)交易在內(nèi)的多種債券實(shí)現(xiàn)了市場(chǎng)化;最后逐漸放松存貸款率的管制,到2014年初為止,我國(guó)僅對(duì)存款利率存在上限管制,基本形成了以Shibor為短期、國(guó)債為長(zhǎng)期的市場(chǎng)化利率體系。改革雖已取得了顯著的成效,但面臨的問題仍然嚴(yán)峻,存款利率上限管制造就了實(shí)際利率低于均衡水平、信貸歧視現(xiàn)象顯著以及金融業(yè)投資效率不高的問題。 隨著金融改革的推進(jìn),存款利率的管制放松將成為必然選擇,而利率市場(chǎng)化意味著利率競(jìng)爭(zhēng)格局逐步形成,并將對(duì)實(shí)體經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展產(chǎn)生深刻影響。 進(jìn)而本文基于利率市場(chǎng)化(存款利率上限管制放松)對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的影響機(jī)理,首先使用1990-2010年,我國(guó)24個(gè)工業(yè)行業(yè)的面板數(shù)據(jù)通過廣義最小二乘法檢驗(yàn)了利率歧視的分行業(yè)特征,發(fā)現(xiàn)我國(guó)信貸歧視現(xiàn)象確實(shí)由于國(guó)有企業(yè)的行業(yè)分布的越位和缺位特征存在于行業(yè)間。繼而,基于中國(guó)動(dòng)態(tài)可計(jì)算一般均衡模型(Chinagem)的基礎(chǔ)上,基于投資行為的視角構(gòu)建了信貸歧視的動(dòng)態(tài)CGE模型,刻畫了當(dāng)前利率市場(chǎng)化改革的影響特征,分別模擬整體利率水平提高、分行業(yè)利率歧視消除、以及金融服務(wù)增效此三條路徑的動(dòng)態(tài)影響及綜合影響。研究結(jié)果表明,盡管整體利率水平提高不利于中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)長(zhǎng)期增長(zhǎng),但隨著利率歧視的消除,,行業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)在長(zhǎng)期進(jìn)一步優(yōu)化,減緩了投資規(guī)模和經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的下降程度,并帶來了較為顯著的就業(yè)效應(yīng)。長(zhǎng)期而言,改革更多的福利源于金融行業(yè)挖掘增長(zhǎng)潛力后帶來的對(duì)其他行業(yè)的服務(wù)增效,最終為中國(guó)長(zhǎng)期經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)帶來了較大的空間。
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up, China has actively adjusted the overall level of interest rates and the structure of interest rates, and improved the interest rate management system to lay a solid foundation for the liberalization of interest rates. In 1993, the third Plenary session of the 14th CPC Congress proposed the marketization of interest rates for the first time. As of 2014, the marketization process of our country has gone through about 20 years. During this period, great achievements have been made in the marketization of interest rates in our country. In 1996 and 2007, respectively, Chibor and Shiborestablished a market-oriented interest rate system. Many kinds of bonds, such as inter-bank bond trading and inter-bank repo transaction, have been marketized. Finally, the regulation of deposit and loan rate has been gradually relaxed. Until early 2014, China only has the upper limit control on deposit interest rate, which basically takes Shibor as the short-term. National debt is a long-term market-oriented interest rate system. Although the reform has achieved remarkable results, the problems facing it are still severe. The upper limit control of deposit interest rates has resulted in the actual interest rate being below the equilibrium level. The phenomenon of credit discrimination is obvious and the investment efficiency of financial industry is not high. With the development of financial reform, the deregulation of deposit interest rate will become an inevitable choice, and the marketization of interest rate means that the pattern of interest rate competition is gradually formed and will have a profound impact on the development of real economy. Then, based on the mechanism of interest rate liberalization (deregulation of the upper limit of deposit interest rate) on economic growth, this paper first uses 1990-2010. The panel data of 24 industries in China tested the subsectoral characteristics of interest rate discrimination by using the generalized least square method, and found that the phenomenon of credit discrimination in China is indeed due to the offside and absence characteristics of the industry distribution of state-owned enterprises. Based on the Chinese dynamic computable general equilibrium model, this paper constructs a dynamic CGE model of credit discrimination from the perspective of investment behavior, depicts the influence characteristics of the current interest rate marketization reform, and simulates the improvement of the overall interest rate level, respectively. Elimination of interest rate discrimination by industry, and dynamic and comprehensive effects of the three paths of increasing interest rates in financial services. The results of the study show that although the overall interest rate level is not conducive to the long-term growth of the Chinese economy, with the elimination of interest rate discrimination, The industry structure has been further optimized in the long run, slowing down the decline in investment size and economic growth, and bringing about a more significant employment effect. In the long run, The reform of more welfare comes from the service efficiency of other industries after the financial industry exploits its growth potential, and finally brings more space for China's long-term economic growth.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2014
【分類號(hào)】:F224;F124;F822.0
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 孔麗娜;鄭新;;拉美國(guó)家利率市場(chǎng)化經(jīng)驗(yàn)及對(duì)我國(guó)的啟示[J];南方金融;2011年04期
2 肖欣榮;伍永剛;;美國(guó)利率市場(chǎng)化改革對(duì)銀行業(yè)的影響[J];國(guó)際金融研究;2011年01期
3 薩奇;利率市場(chǎng)化與高利率關(guān)系的國(guó)際經(jīng)驗(yàn)[J];國(guó)際金融研究;1996年01期
4 王潔;利率市場(chǎng)化是我國(guó)金融體制改革的關(guān)鍵[J];管理世界;2001年01期
5 賓國(guó)強(qiáng);實(shí)際利率、金融深化與中國(guó)的經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)科學(xué);1999年03期
6 羅良文;雷鵬飛;;利率市場(chǎng)化對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)方式轉(zhuǎn)變的影響[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)問題;2011年10期
7 宋芳秀;;中國(guó)利率作用機(jī)制的有效性與利率調(diào)控的效果——兼論利率不宜作為當(dāng)前我國(guó)貨幣政策調(diào)控目標(biāo)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)動(dòng)態(tài);2008年02期
8 王國(guó)松;中國(guó)的利率管制與利率市場(chǎng)化[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2001年06期
9 張軍,金煜;中國(guó)的金融深化和生產(chǎn)率關(guān)系的再檢測(cè):1987—2001[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2005年11期
10 魏巍賢;;人民幣升值的宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)影響評(píng)價(jià)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2006年04期
本文編號(hào):1554711
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/jingjiguanlilunwen/1554711.html