本文選題：徽州　切入點：民居建筑　出處：《西安建筑科技大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：我國農(nóng)村地區(qū)近年來的加速發(fā)展從物質(zhì)環(huán)境層面上來看,一方面促進(jìn)了農(nóng)村地區(qū)生活環(huán)境的向現(xiàn)代生活標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的靠近,另一方面也帶來了對于原有傳統(tǒng)民居建筑體系和鄉(xiāng)村淳樸生活環(huán)境的破壞。這一矛盾在徽州地區(qū)體現(xiàn)的尤為明顯,也是這一地區(qū)的民居在更新發(fā)展過程所伴隨而來的陣痛。而傳統(tǒng)學(xué)術(shù)研究在該領(lǐng)域投入的力量還很薄弱。在此背景下,主導(dǎo)建設(shè)與更新發(fā)展的過程的社會力量和轉(zhuǎn)化程序選擇十分關(guān)鍵,也就是民居更新發(fā)展方式的問題。通過對群眾、當(dāng)?shù)卣�、外部社會力量三方的作用過程的研究,可以限定出自上而下和自下而上兩種主要的民居更新發(fā)展方式。對于這兩種更新發(fā)展方式在建筑層面給徽州民居帶來的影響,在本文的研究與寫作中予以關(guān)注。通過實地調(diào)研和理論對比分析,可知在當(dāng)前社會發(fā)展階段:自下而上的方式是一種對現(xiàn)實社會環(huán)境條件更加敏感的更新發(fā)展方式,更多地體現(xiàn)了個人意志對于更新發(fā)展的影響,既包含了個人需求的自由表達(dá),也包含了社會規(guī)則的制約與規(guī)訓(xùn),建成的民居具有生活信息含量豐富,地域?qū)傩悦黠@、現(xiàn)代基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施建設(shè)難以同步進(jìn)行等特征;自上而下的方式是一種容易受到宏觀政策與大環(huán)境影響的更新發(fā)展方式,容易造成建成民居缺乏生活細(xì)節(jié)反饋、原型來源與技術(shù)措施受到社會主流趨勢的限制、基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施建設(shè)情況較好等特點。通過對徽州地區(qū)民居更新發(fā)展在建筑層面所面對的問題的分析,提出在居住層面、文化層面、學(xué)術(shù)實踐層面對民居更新發(fā)展方式進(jìn)行比選的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。參照標(biāo)準(zhǔn)進(jìn)行對比研究,可以得出:在現(xiàn)階段自上而下更新發(fā)展方式的優(yōu)勢在于其標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化技術(shù)和接近現(xiàn)代生活標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的居住環(huán)境對于村民的吸引力,并且在傳統(tǒng)民居建筑遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)方面具有其他更新發(fā)展方式不可比擬的優(yōu)點。自下而上更新發(fā)展方式的優(yōu)勢在于其靈活性和與現(xiàn)實生活的緊密聯(lián)系與呼應(yīng),從長遠(yuǎn)角度來說,自下而上的更新發(fā)展方式還更易于發(fā)展一種與建筑環(huán)境相適應(yīng)的生活和文化;對于學(xué)術(shù)界來說,應(yīng)當(dāng)順應(yīng)大趨勢的發(fā)展,合理的釋放研究過程中所積累的能量與知識,參與民居建設(shè)實踐。針對于以上研究,提出應(yīng)當(dāng)發(fā)展一種考慮全局,同時適應(yīng)具體環(huán)境的更新發(fā)展方式。同時,加強不同層次的學(xué)者以適宜的方式參與徽州民居的更新發(fā)展活動。最后指出,這兩種主要的更新發(fā)展方式的出現(xiàn)是當(dāng)前社會階段的產(chǎn)物。隨著社會發(fā)展和經(jīng)濟體制的完善,兩種更新發(fā)展方式可能有相互融合的趨勢。
[Abstract]:The accelerated development of rural areas in China in recent years has, on the one hand, promoted the proximity of the living environment in rural areas to the modern standard of living in terms of the material environment.On the other hand, it also brings about the destruction of the original traditional residential building system and the rural simple living environment.This contradiction is especially evident in Huizhou area, and it is also the labor pain accompanying by the renewal and development of residential houses in this area.But the traditional academic research in this field investment strength is still very weak.Under this background, the social force and the choice of transformation procedure that lead the process of construction and renewal development are very important, that is, the issue of the renewal and development mode of folk residence.Through the study of the tripartite action process of the masses, local governments and external social forces, two main ways of residential renewal and development can be defined: top-down and bottom-up.This paper pays close attention to the influence of these two new development ways on Huizhou residence on the architectural level.Through field research and theoretical comparison and analysis, we can see that in the current stage of social development: the bottom-up approach is a more sensitive to the real social environment conditions of renewal and development, more reflect the personal will on the impact of renewal and development.It includes not only the free expression of individual needs, but also the restriction and discipline of social rules. The built houses have the characteristics of rich life information, obvious regional attributes, and the modern infrastructure construction is difficult to carry out simultaneously.The top-down approach is a new way of development that is vulnerable to macro policies and environmental impacts, which can easily lead to a lack of feedback on the details of the life of the houses built, and the source of the prototype and the technical measures are restricted by the mainstream trend of the society.Infrastructure construction is relatively good and other characteristics.Based on the analysis of the problems faced by the residential renewal and development in Huizhou area, this paper puts forward the standards of comparing the residential renewal and development methods in the residential level, the cultural level and the academic practice level.Comparing with the standard of reference, we can conclude that the advantage of the top-down development mode at this stage lies in the attraction of the standardized technology and the living environment close to the modern standard of living for the villagers.And in the traditional residential building heritage protection has other unparalleled advantages.The advantage of the bottom-up renewal development mode lies in its flexibility and the close connection and echo with the real life. In the long run, the bottom-up renewal development mode is also easier to develop a kind of life and culture adapted to the architectural environment;For the academic circles, we should conform to the development of the general trend, reasonably release the energy and knowledge accumulated in the research process, and participate in the practice of residential construction.In view of the above research, it is suggested that a new development mode should be developed that considers the overall situation and adapts to the specific environment at the same time.At the same time, strengthen the different levels of scholars to participate in Huizhou residential renewal and development activities in a suitable way.Finally, it is pointed out that the emergence of these two main ways of renewal and development is the product of the current social stage.With the development of society and the perfection of economic system, there may be a trend of integration between the two new ways of development.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西安建筑科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：TU241.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 黃昱;王竹;;人性化建筑設(shè)計的多維解析[J];華中建筑;2006年02期

2 吳志宏;;中國鄉(xiāng)土建筑研究的脈絡(luò)、問題及展望[J];昆明理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2014年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 張群;西北荒漠化地區(qū)生態(tài)民居建筑模式研究[D];西安建筑科技大學(xué);2011年

2 李昕;轉(zhuǎn)型期江南古鎮(zhèn)保護(hù)制度變遷研究[D];同濟大學(xué);2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 殷萊萊;徽州民居空間環(huán)境及其保護(hù)更新研究[D];合肥工業(yè)大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號：1708810