本文關(guān)鍵詞： 反收購 股權(quán)結(jié)構(gòu) 混業(yè)經(jīng)營 資產(chǎn)重組　出處：《河北大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：自2012年以來我國經(jīng)濟進(jìn)入明顯的下行通道,不斷降低的資產(chǎn)回報率與貨幣寬松政策共同造就了資金較多而優(yōu)質(zhì)資產(chǎn)較少的“資產(chǎn)荒”局面�！百Y產(chǎn)荒”問題使得金融機構(gòu)風(fēng)險偏好逐漸增強,不斷通過配置高風(fēng)險的資產(chǎn)來增加盈利。另一方面,金融混業(yè)經(jīng)營不斷增速,銀行理財資金繞道進(jìn)入股市,保險資金也在資本市場頻頻舉牌,混業(yè)經(jīng)營使得金融牌照價值大幅走高,一些保險企業(yè)甚至成為了控股公司投融資的利器。在這一系列因素的疊加下,催生了以融資難度降低、資金脫實向虛、優(yōu)質(zhì)企業(yè)吸引力增強為特征的第六次收購浪潮。在這次浪潮中,以弱吞強、杠桿收購為特征的惡意收購事件不斷涌現(xiàn)。尤其是2015年7月開始的萬科股權(quán)之爭事件牽動著我國資本市場所有人的神經(jīng)。面對大環(huán)境下惡意收購的不斷增多、混業(yè)經(jīng)營帶來的金融風(fēng)險不斷增加等問題,以萬科股權(quán)之爭事件為切入點進(jìn)行深入的案例分析,將對我國上市公司的公司治理及反收購戰(zhàn)略設(shè)計提供借鑒,對金融業(yè)新形勢下的協(xié)同監(jiān)管也有積極意義。本文首先對中西方關(guān)于反收購理論的發(fā)展歷程進(jìn)行了回顧,通過綜合整理國內(nèi)外關(guān)于反收購的前沿理論成果,對案例分析提供理論支持。在具體案例分析的過程中,以時間進(jìn)程和資金流動兩條線索同時對案例進(jìn)行梳理,在運用理論分析的同時注重結(jié)合我國資本市場獨特的法律環(huán)境和制度環(huán)境,通過對收購與反收購雙方的動機、策略進(jìn)行分析與點評,設(shè)計出具有中國特色、符合中國國情的反收購方案。最后,由個案分析上升到對上市公司治理的啟示以及宏觀監(jiān)管政策制定的建議層面,將個案中普遍適用的原理進(jìn)行推廣。在萬科股權(quán)之爭的案例中,惡意收購方寶能系利用保險資金、銀行配資、股權(quán)質(zhì)押、收益互換、融資融券等多種手段以杠桿收購的方式搶購萬科股份成為了萬科第一大股東。寶能系利用了眾多金融工具,資金流動較為隱蔽,杠桿比例也較高,風(fēng)險極大。萬科管理層在事件中,利用資產(chǎn)重組、拉攏股東、增加員工持股等方式反擊寶能系,手段很多,但效果有限,直至監(jiān)管層的介入才基本平息股權(quán)紛爭。這也反映出了我國上市公司普遍風(fēng)險意識不強、忽略中小股東利益、公司治理存在缺陷等問題。在金融機構(gòu)混業(yè)經(jīng)營加速、資產(chǎn)荒與資金脫實向虛不斷加劇的新形勢下,我國上市公司在反收購戰(zhàn)略設(shè)計上應(yīng)該更加注重預(yù)防措施的建立,以預(yù)防為主,攻擊為輔,同時在公司治理上將股權(quán)結(jié)構(gòu)和股東利益問題解決好,將惡意收購扼殺在搖籃之中。金融監(jiān)管部門也應(yīng)加強對混業(yè)經(jīng)營與金融創(chuàng)新的監(jiān)管,在制度設(shè)計上為優(yōu)秀的上市公司發(fā)展保駕護(hù)航。
[Abstract]:Since 2012, China's economy has entered an obvious downward channel. The declining rate of return on assets and monetary easing policy together created a "shortage of assets" with more capital and less high-quality assets. The problem of "asset shortage" makes financial institutions' risk appetite gradually increase. On the other hand, the financial mixed operation continues to grow, the bank financial management funds detour into the stock market, insurance funds are also frequently held in the capital market. Mixed operation makes the value of financial license greatly higher, and some insurance companies even become a sharp weapon for holding companies to invest and finance. Under the superposition of this series of factors, the difficulty of financing is reduced, and the funds are devoid of reality. A wave of 6th acquisitions characterized by an increase in the attractiveness of quality companies. In this wave, it is weak and strong. The hostile takeover events characterized by leveraged buyouts continue to emerge, especially the Vanke stock ownership dispute that began on July 2015, which affects the nerves of all people in the capital market of our country. In the face of the increasing hostile takeover under the general environment. More. The financial risk caused by mixed operation is increasing and so on. Taking Vanke's stock right dispute as the starting point, the in-depth case analysis will provide reference for the corporate governance and anti-takeover strategy design of listed companies in China. This paper first reviews the development of anti-takeover theory in China and the West, and summarizes the frontier theoretical achievements of anti-takeover at home and abroad. To provide theoretical support for case analysis. In the process of specific case analysis, the case is combed with two clues: time process and capital flow. In the use of theoretical analysis at the same time pay attention to the unique legal and institutional environment of China's capital market, through the acquisition and anti-takeover of both sides of the motivation, strategy analysis and comments, the design has Chinese characteristics. Finally, from case analysis to the enlightenment to the listed company governance and macro-regulatory policy recommendations. In the case of Vanke equity dispute, the malicious takeover of Fang Baoneng is the use of insurance funds, bank allocation, equity pledge, income swaps. Margin financing and other means of leveraged buy-out to buy Vanke shares became the largest shareholder of Vanke. Baoneng used many financial instruments, the capital flow is more hidden, leverage ratio is also high. Great risk. Vanke management in the incident, the use of asset restructuring, attract shareholders, increase employee ownership and other ways to counter Baoneng system, many means, but the effect is limited. Until the intervention of the regulatory level before the basic settlement of the stock dispute, which also reflects the general risk awareness of listed companies in China is not strong, ignoring the interests of small and medium shareholders. There are some defects in corporate governance. Under the new situation of accelerating the mixed operation of financial institutions, the shortage of assets and the shortage of funds are becoming more and more serious. China's listed companies in the anti-takeover strategy design should pay more attention to the establishment of preventive measures, mainly to prevent, attack as a supplementary, at the same time in corporate governance will be the equity structure and shareholders' interests to solve the problem. The financial supervision department should also strengthen the supervision of mixed operation and financial innovation, and guarantee the development of outstanding listed companies in the system design.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F832.51;F299.233.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 丁磊;;資本市場并購視域下反收購措施的合法性——以“毒丸”計劃制定與啟動權(quán)力分配為例[J];國際金融;2017年01期

2 黃小雪;陳昌明;;基于博弈論的反惡意股權(quán)收購策略研究[J];知識經(jīng)濟;2017年01期

3 武琪;熊曉帥;;萬科到阿里,公司控股權(quán)安排的新革命[J];財經(jīng)界;2016年12期

4 黃金曦;徐丹;;不完全信息下上市公司股權(quán)反收購動態(tài)博弈——基于萬科與寶能系的股權(quán)之爭[J];財會通訊;2016年32期

5 侯雋;;陽光保險舉牌伊利 伊利緊急停牌疑籌謀反收購[J];中國經(jīng)濟周刊;2016年38期

6 馬浚洋;傅穎詩;李昱;張曾蓮;胡志穎;李曉靜;;寶能系并購中期風(fēng)險識別、評估與控制——基于AHP-AGA改進(jìn)綜合模糊評價方法[J];中國注冊會計師;2016年09期

7 黃婷婷;;反收購“毒丸計劃”在中國的構(gòu)建[J];廣西民族師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;2016年04期

8 王繼禹;;對上市公司獨立董事制度的觀察與思考——以寶能萬科之爭為背景[J];經(jīng)濟研究參考;2016年44期

9 張曉闊;孟維福;;淺析寶能舉牌萬科的風(fēng)險和監(jiān)管[J];經(jīng)營管理者;2016年21期

10 何建國;劉超;;萬科控制權(quán)之爭引發(fā)的思考[J];財會通訊;2016年19期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 張錦;目標(biāo)公司反收購決定權(quán)研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2016年

2 張詩慧;毒丸反收購策略在境內(nèi)資本市場的法律規(guī)制研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2016年

3 干曉艷;上市公司收購中的中小股東利益保護(hù)[D];華東政法大學(xué);2016年

4 劉云心;中國燃?xì)鈱π聤W能源反收購案例研究[D];華南理工大學(xué);2015年

5 何偉;上市公司反收購法律問題研究[D];北京化工大學(xué);2015年

6 滕婉春;生命人壽公司收購農(nóng)產(chǎn)品公司的反收購案例研究[D];新疆財經(jīng)大學(xué);2015年

7 張曉靜;反收購中股份回購的研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2015年

8 曹猛;基于惡意收購的上市公司反收購策略研究[D];河南大學(xué);2013年

9 馬繼雷;上市公司反收購中的中小股東權(quán)益保護(hù)研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2009年

10 徐婷;從公司反收購實踐論我國公司反收購法律制度的不足及完善[D];浙江工商大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號：1479164