【摘要】：在不同國(guó)家,城市化的路徑存在廣泛差異,差異化路徑導(dǎo)致了大相徑庭的城市化結(jié)果。本文綜合比較英、法、德三個(gè)代表性國(guó)家城市化過(guò)程中的主體類(lèi)型、主體互動(dòng)以及主體的差異化偏好,結(jié)果表明:(1)特定的發(fā)展場(chǎng)景塑造了不同偏好類(lèi)型的城市化主體,進(jìn)而決定了這些主體對(duì)城市化的態(tài)度和行為;(2)不同階層之間的利益關(guān)聯(lián)和良性互動(dòng)是城市化健康推進(jìn)的根本保障,利益沖突會(huì)導(dǎo)致城市化淪為特殊階層的食利工具;(3)對(duì)于當(dāng)下中國(guó),新型城市化必須轉(zhuǎn)變資源整合方式,促進(jìn)多元參與,引導(dǎo)廣大市民(農(nóng)民)、企業(yè)和政府共同融入城市化進(jìn)程中,實(shí)現(xiàn)共享式發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:In different countries, the path of urbanization varies widely, and the differentiated path leads to different urbanization results. This paper makes a comprehensive comparison of the main types, interactions and different preferences of subjects in the urbanization process of Britain, France and Germany. The results show that: (1) the specific development scenarios have shaped different types of urbanization subjects. Then it determines the attitude and behavior of these subjects to urbanization; (2) the relationship and positive interaction between different strata is the fundamental guarantee for the healthy advancement of urbanization, and the conflict of interest will lead to urbanization becoming a special class of food and interest tools; (3) for the present China, the new urbanization must change the way of resource integration, promote multiple participation, guide the masses of citizens (farmers), enterprises and government to integrate into the process of urbanization, and realize the shared development.
【作者單位】： 許昌學(xué)院中原農(nóng)村發(fā)展研究中心;山西大學(xué)中國(guó)城鄉(xiāng)發(fā)展研究院;
【基金】：國(guó)家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目“新常態(tài)下我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)持續(xù)增長(zhǎng)與政府?dāng)U張的內(nèi)在機(jī)理研究”(15CJL013)
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F299.56

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 王知貴;淺析我國(guó)所選擇的市場(chǎng)主體互動(dòng)的變遷方式[J];湖北師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1997年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：2385907