三種權(quán)重賦權(quán)法的比較分析
發(fā)布時間:2018-04-27 03:26
本文選題:綜合評價 + 熵權(quán)法。 參考:《中國集體經(jīng)濟(jì)》2016年34期
【摘要】:綜合評價問題的關(guān)鍵是確定各評價指標(biāo)的權(quán)重系數(shù)。目前,計算權(quán)重系數(shù)的方法很多,主要包括主觀賦權(quán)法和客觀賦權(quán)法兩類,主要對客觀賦權(quán)法中的熵權(quán)法、標(biāo)準(zhǔn)離差法和CRITIC法進(jìn)行分析,并結(jié)合高等教育中教學(xué)質(zhì)量綜合評價問題探討三種方法的優(yōu)劣性。
[Abstract]:The key of comprehensive evaluation is to determine the weight coefficient of each evaluation index. At present, there are many methods to calculate the weight coefficient, including subjective weighting method and objective weighting method. The entropy method, standard deviation method and CRITIC method are mainly analyzed. Combined with the comprehensive evaluation of teaching quality in higher education, the advantages and disadvantages of the three methods are discussed.
【作者單位】: 吉林醫(yī)藥學(xué)院生物醫(yī)學(xué)工程學(xué)院;
【分類號】:F224
,
本文編號:1808977
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/hongguanjingjilunwen/1808977.html
最近更新
教材專著