本文選題：廣義虛擬經(jīng)濟(jì) + 裝備制造業(yè)��； 參考：《南京航空航天大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：裝備制造業(yè)是我國工業(yè)的核心和基礎(chǔ),是國家的戰(zhàn)略性產(chǎn)業(yè)。目前,中國裝備制造業(yè)發(fā)展迅速,但從全球價(jià)值鏈的角度來看,中國的裝備制造業(yè)在全球價(jià)值鏈中仍處于低端位置。而隨著服務(wù)業(yè)的蓬勃發(fā)展與崛起,服務(wù)業(yè)對(duì)裝備制造業(yè)的資金支持、技術(shù)支持和環(huán)境支持等效果愈加明顯,制造業(yè)服務(wù)化也日益被重視。因此,從廣義虛擬經(jīng)濟(jì)的角度進(jìn)行中國裝備制造業(yè)與服務(wù)業(yè)的融合發(fā)展具有較大意義,可以更好地推動(dòng)中國裝備制造業(yè)的發(fā)展和全球價(jià)值鏈地位的穩(wěn)步提升。本文從廣義虛擬經(jīng)濟(jì)的視角出發(fā),旨在分析裝備制造業(yè)和服務(wù)業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)融合的動(dòng)因、程度、績效及對(duì)裝備制造業(yè)全球價(jià)值鏈地位提升的作用。首先以廣義虛擬經(jīng)濟(jì)、產(chǎn)業(yè)融合和全球價(jià)值鏈的相關(guān)理論為基礎(chǔ),定性分析裝備制造業(yè)與現(xiàn)代服務(wù)業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)融合的動(dòng)因及對(duì)裝備制造業(yè)全球價(jià)值鏈地位的影響;接著將現(xiàn)代服務(wù)業(yè)按照廣義虛擬經(jīng)濟(jì)的定義重新分類,基于投入產(chǎn)出表測(cè)算我國裝備制造業(yè)與現(xiàn)代服務(wù)業(yè)的融合度,分析融合現(xiàn)狀和存在的問題;然后以復(fù)合系統(tǒng)協(xié)調(diào)度為績效指標(biāo),運(yùn)用協(xié)同學(xué)方法分析了我國裝備制造業(yè)與現(xiàn)代服務(wù)業(yè)整體及分行業(yè)的復(fù)合系統(tǒng)2002-2014年的發(fā)展?fàn)顩r;以裝備制造業(yè)全球價(jià)值鏈地位為績效指標(biāo),基于VAR計(jì)量模型和灰色關(guān)聯(lián)度模型測(cè)算了裝備制造業(yè)與現(xiàn)代服務(wù)業(yè)整體和分行業(yè)的融合績效。結(jié)果表明,我國裝備制造業(yè)與現(xiàn)代服務(wù)業(yè)融合趨勢(shì)顯著,但各行業(yè)融合度有差異;融合績效上,從復(fù)合系統(tǒng)協(xié)調(diào)度來看,裝備制造業(yè)與現(xiàn)代服務(wù)業(yè)整體逐漸有序,協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展,尤其與廣義虛擬經(jīng)濟(jì)性質(zhì)的生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)協(xié)調(diào)度最高;從裝備制造業(yè)全球價(jià)值鏈地位來看,整體產(chǎn)業(yè)融合度是裝備制造業(yè)全球價(jià)值鏈地位的格蘭杰原因,且對(duì)裝備制造業(yè)價(jià)值鏈地位提升有正向的作用,但各行業(yè)融合績效有差距,更具有廣義虛擬經(jīng)濟(jì)性質(zhì)的金融服務(wù)業(yè)和商務(wù)服務(wù)業(yè)的融合對(duì)我國裝備制造業(yè)全球價(jià)值鏈地位提升顯現(xiàn)出一定效果,交通物流服務(wù)業(yè)績效也較高,而信息服務(wù)業(yè)和科技服務(wù)業(yè)從與價(jià)值鏈地位表現(xiàn)出的關(guān)聯(lián)性來看并沒有達(dá)到良好效果。最后,根據(jù)實(shí)證分析結(jié)果,提出促進(jìn)我國裝備制造業(yè)與現(xiàn)代服務(wù)業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)融合以及提升裝備制造業(yè)全球價(jià)值鏈地位的相關(guān)對(duì)策建議,為廣義虛擬經(jīng)濟(jì)要求下我國裝備制造業(yè)更好的發(fā)展提供參考。
[Abstract]:Equipment manufacturing industry is the core and foundation of China's industry, is the strategic industry of the country. At present, China's equipment manufacturing industry is developing rapidly, but from the perspective of global value chain, China's equipment manufacturing industry is still at the low end of the global value chain. With the vigorous development and rise of the service industry, the financial support, technical support and environmental support of the service industry to the equipment manufacturing industry become more and more obvious, and the service of the manufacturing industry is paid more and more attention. Therefore, it is of great significance to develop China's equipment manufacturing industry and service industry from the point of view of generalized virtual economy, which can better promote the development of China's equipment manufacturing industry and the steady improvement of global value chain status. From the perspective of generalized virtual economy, this paper aims to analyze the motivation, degree, performance and role of equipment manufacturing industry in the promotion of global value chain. Firstly, based on the theories of generalized virtual economy, industrial convergence and global value chain, this paper qualitatively analyzes the causes of the integration of equipment manufacturing industry and modern service industry and its influence on the position of global value chain of equipment manufacturing industry. Then it reclassifies the modern service industry according to the definition of generalized virtual economy, calculates the fusion degree of our country's equipment manufacturing industry and modern service industry based on the input-output table, and analyzes the present situation and existing problems of the integration. Then, taking the coordination degree of composite system as the performance index, using the method of Synergetics, this paper analyzes the development of the composite system of equipment manufacturing industry and modern service industry in China from 2002 to 2014, and takes the global value chain position of equipment manufacturing industry as the performance index. Based on VAR model and grey correlation model, the performance of equipment manufacturing industry and modern service industry is estimated. The results show that the integration trend of equipment manufacturing industry and modern service industry is remarkable, but the integration degree of different industries is different, and from the view of the coordination degree of composite system, the equipment manufacturing industry and modern service industry as a whole develop in an orderly and coordinated manner. Especially with the generalized virtual economy nature of producer services coordination is the highest; from the equipment manufacturing global value chain position, the overall industry integration is the Granger reason for the equipment manufacturing global value chain status. And it has a positive effect on equipment manufacturing value chain, but there is a gap in the performance of industry convergence. The integration of financial service industry and business service industry, which has the nature of generalized virtual economy, has a certain effect on the promotion of global value chain status of China's equipment manufacturing industry, and the performance of transportation logistics service industry is also relatively high. However, the information service industry and the science and technology service industry have not achieved good results in terms of their relevance to the value chain position. Finally, according to the results of empirical analysis, the paper puts forward some countermeasures to promote the integration of China's equipment manufacturing industry and modern service industry, as well as to promote the position of equipment manufacturing industry as a global value chain. It provides a reference for the better development of China's equipment manufacturing industry under the requirement of generalized virtual economy.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京航空航天大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F426;F719

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉英基;;知識(shí)資本對(duì)制造業(yè)出口技術(shù)復(fù)雜度影響的實(shí)證分析[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2016年03期

2 林桂軍;何武;;中國裝備制造業(yè)在全球價(jià)值鏈的地位及升級(jí)趨勢(shì)[J];國際貿(mào)易問題;2015年04期

3 陳永新;吳小平;;廣義虛擬經(jīng)濟(jì)視角下制造業(yè)跨越式發(fā)展內(nèi)涵研究[J];廣義虛擬經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2014年04期

4 劉佳;代明;易順;;先進(jìn)制造業(yè)與現(xiàn)代服務(wù)業(yè)融合:實(shí)現(xiàn)機(jī)理及路徑選擇[J];學(xué)習(xí)與實(shí)踐;2014年06期

5 劉川;;產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)型中現(xiàn)代服務(wù)業(yè)與先進(jìn)制造業(yè)融合度研究——基于珠三角地區(qū)的實(shí)證分析[J];江西社會(huì)科學(xué);2014年05期

6 毛蘊(yùn)詩;溫思雅;;企業(yè)漸進(jìn)式升級(jí)、競爭優(yōu)勢(shì)與驅(qū)動(dòng)因素研究[J];東南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年02期

7 張振剛;陳志明;胡琪玲;;生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)對(duì)制造業(yè)效率提升的影響研究[J];科研管理;2014年01期

8 徐寧;皮建才;劉志彪;;全球價(jià)值鏈還是國內(nèi)價(jià)值鏈——中國代工企業(yè)的鏈條選擇機(jī)制研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)理論與經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2014年01期

9 綦良群;趙龍雙;;基于產(chǎn)品價(jià)值鏈的生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)與裝備制造業(yè)的融合研究[J];工業(yè)技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì);2013年12期

10 林木西;崔純;;生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)與裝備制造業(yè)的互動(dòng)發(fā)展[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2013年12期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 胡永佳;產(chǎn)業(yè)融合的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析[D];中共中央黨校;2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 蔣寶珠;廣義虛擬經(jīng)濟(jì)視角下金融創(chuàng)新與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長的協(xié)同度分析[D];武漢理工大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：1823943