北京市生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)對制造業(yè)效率的影響研究
本文選題:生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè) + 制造業(yè)效率。 參考:《北京交通大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文
【摘要】:隨著北京市制造業(yè)創(chuàng)新發(fā)展和"高精尖"進(jìn)程的推進(jìn),提高制造業(yè)效率變得尤為緊迫。然而北京市制造業(yè)仍然面臨著效率不高、低成本性制造業(yè)占比大等困境。同時,北京市生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)擁有知識密集、資本密集等優(yōu)勢,對拉動經(jīng)濟(jì)增長做出重要貢獻(xiàn)。緊隨世界發(fā)達(dá)國家由"工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)"向"服務(wù)經(jīng)濟(jì)"轉(zhuǎn)型的大潮,北京市應(yīng)該利用得天獨(dú)厚的生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展優(yōu)勢,提高生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)對制造業(yè)效率的促進(jìn)作用,實(shí)現(xiàn)北京市制造業(yè)的創(chuàng)新發(fā)展。本文在梳理相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)和對北京市兩大產(chǎn)業(yè)現(xiàn)狀分析的基礎(chǔ)上,通過灰色關(guān)聯(lián)度分析來定量研究北京市生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)及其細(xì)分行業(yè)對制造業(yè)效率的影響;進(jìn)一步,提出了生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展水平對制造業(yè)效率的調(diào)節(jié)機(jī)理,即生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展水平可以分別調(diào)節(jié)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新、人力資本存量和地區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展水平對制造業(yè)效率的影響,并進(jìn)行具體路徑分析;最后,通過層級回歸的實(shí)證分析,定量分析了生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)及其細(xì)分行業(yè)發(fā)展水平對制造業(yè)效率影響的調(diào)節(jié)效應(yīng),即研究了北京市在技術(shù)創(chuàng)新水平、地區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展和人力資本存量與制造業(yè)效率關(guān)系中,生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)及其細(xì)分行業(yè)發(fā)展水平是否發(fā)揮相應(yīng)的調(diào)節(jié)效應(yīng)。通過實(shí)證分析,得到如下結(jié)果:第一,北京市生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)對制造業(yè)效率產(chǎn)生正向的關(guān)聯(lián)關(guān)系:傳統(tǒng)的生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)與制造業(yè)效率之間關(guān)聯(lián)關(guān)系較弱;而包括金融、信息、科技等生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)與制造業(yè)效率關(guān)聯(lián)較強(qiáng),對制造業(yè)效率產(chǎn)生較強(qiáng)的促進(jìn)作用。第二,北京市生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展水平對制造業(yè)效率發(fā)揮了相應(yīng)的調(diào)節(jié)效應(yīng):現(xiàn)代信息、科技、商務(wù)等生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)普遍展現(xiàn)出較強(qiáng)的調(diào)節(jié)效應(yīng);傳統(tǒng)生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)調(diào)節(jié)效應(yīng)不顯著,或存在較弱的調(diào)節(jié)效應(yīng)。第三,基于人力資本存量,生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展水平發(fā)揮了最為顯著的調(diào)節(jié)效應(yīng),北京市人力資本密集。第四,金融業(yè)作為北京市生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)的主導(dǎo)產(chǎn)業(yè),其發(fā)展水平對促進(jìn)制造業(yè)效率的提升發(fā)揮的調(diào)節(jié)效應(yīng)不強(qiáng)。本文在前人文獻(xiàn)的基礎(chǔ)上分析了具體的調(diào)節(jié)機(jī)理路徑,從調(diào)節(jié)效應(yīng)的微觀層面研究生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)對制造業(yè)效率的影響,彌補(bǔ)了目前內(nèi)在影響機(jī)理分析匱乏的缺陷;同時從北京市制造業(yè)效率的視角進(jìn)行區(qū)域產(chǎn)業(yè)研究,彌補(bǔ)了目前北京市制造業(yè)效率分析不足的現(xiàn)狀,為提高北京市制造業(yè)效率提供了支撐。
[Abstract]:With the innovation and development of manufacturing industry in Beijing and the advancement of "high precision" process, it is particularly urgent to improve the efficiency of manufacturing industry. However, the manufacturing industry in Beijing is still faced with low efficiency and low-cost manufacturing industry. At the same time, Beijing producer services have the advantages of knowledge-intensive and capital-intensive, which make important contribution to economic growth. Following the tide of transition from "industrial economy" to "service economy" in developed countries in the world, Beijing should take advantage of its unique advantages in the development of producer services to enhance the contribution of producer services to manufacturing efficiency. To realize the innovation and development of Beijing manufacturing industry. On the basis of combing the relevant literature and analyzing the present situation of the two major industries in Beijing, this paper quantitatively studies the effect of Beijing producer service industry and its subdivision industries on manufacturing efficiency through grey correlation degree analysis. This paper puts forward the adjustment mechanism of producer service development level to manufacturing efficiency, that is, the development level of producer service industry can adjust the effects of technological innovation, human capital stock and regional economic development level on manufacturing efficiency respectively. Finally, through the empirical analysis of hierarchical regression, quantitative analysis of the impact of producer services and their subdivision on manufacturing efficiency, namely, the level of technological innovation in Beijing. In the relationship between the regional economic development and the stock of human capital and the manufacturing efficiency, whether the development level of producer service industry and its subdivision plays a corresponding regulatory effect. Through the empirical analysis, the following results are obtained: first, Beijing producer services have a positive correlation on manufacturing efficiency: the traditional producer services and manufacturing efficiency have a weak correlation, including finance, information, Producer services, such as science and technology, are closely related to manufacturing efficiency, and have a strong promoting effect on manufacturing efficiency. Second, the development level of Beijing producer service industry has played a corresponding regulatory effect on manufacturing efficiency: modern information, science and technology, commerce and other producer services generally show a strong regulatory effect; The adjustment effect of traditional producer service industry is not significant or weak. Thirdly, based on the stock of human capital, the development level of producer services plays the most significant regulatory effect. Fourth, as the leading industry of Beijing producer service industry, the development level of financial industry does not play a strong regulatory effect on the promotion of manufacturing efficiency. On the basis of previous literatures, this paper analyzes the specific path of regulation mechanism, studies the impact of producer services on manufacturing efficiency from the micro level of adjustment effect, and makes up for the deficiency of the analysis of internal influence mechanism at present. At the same time, the regional industry research is carried out from the perspective of manufacturing efficiency in Beijing, which makes up for the insufficient analysis of manufacturing efficiency in Beijing at present and provides the support for improving the efficiency of manufacturing industry in Beijing.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:北京交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:F719;F427
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 席強(qiáng)敏;李國平;;京津冀生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)空間分工特征及溢出效應(yīng)[J];地理學(xué)報;2015年12期
2 張琴;趙丙奇;鄭旭;;科技服務(wù)業(yè)集聚與制造業(yè)升級:機(jī)理與實(shí)證檢驗(yàn)[J];管理世界;2015年11期
3 徐頑強(qiáng);孫正翠;周麗娟;;基于主成分分析法的科技服務(wù)業(yè)集聚化發(fā)展影響因子研究[J];科技進(jìn)步與對策;2016年01期
4 張清正;李國平;;中國科技服務(wù)業(yè)集聚發(fā)展及影響因素研究[J];中國軟科學(xué);2015年07期
5 張浩然;;生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)集聚與城市經(jīng)濟(jì)績效——基于行業(yè)和地區(qū)異質(zhì)性視角的分析[J];財經(jīng)研究;2015年05期
6 陳啟斐;王晶晶;岳中剛;;研發(fā)外包是否會抑制我國制造業(yè)自主創(chuàng)新能力?[J];數(shù)量經(jīng)濟(jì)技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2015年02期
7 張亞軍;干春暉;鄭若谷;;生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)與制造業(yè)的內(nèi)生與關(guān)聯(lián)效應(yīng)——基于投入產(chǎn)出結(jié)構(gòu)分解技術(shù)的實(shí)證研究[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2014年06期
8 吳福象;曹璐;;生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)集聚機(jī)制與耦合悖論分析——來自長三角16個核心城市的經(jīng)驗(yàn)證據(jù)[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2014年04期
9 劉婷婷;曾洪勇;張華;;京津生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)與制造業(yè)互動關(guān)系比較研究[J];中國人口.資源與環(huán)境;2014年S2期
10 盛豐;;生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)集聚與制造業(yè)升級:機(jī)制與經(jīng)驗(yàn)——來自230個城市數(shù)據(jù)的空間計量分析[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2014年02期
,本文編號:1785291
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/fwjj/1785291.html