本文選題：服務(wù)業(yè)集聚　切入點(diǎn)：專業(yè)化　出處：《重慶大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：關(guān)于產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚的相關(guān)研究，早期主要集中在制造業(yè)，隨著世界經(jīng)濟(jì)由“工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)”向“服務(wù)經(jīng)濟(jì)”轉(zhuǎn)型，服務(wù)業(yè)集聚問(wèn)題成為學(xué)者們關(guān)注的焦點(diǎn)。對(duì)于我國(guó)而言，服務(wù)業(yè)在國(guó)民經(jīng)濟(jì)中的地位越來(lái)越高，成為經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的新引擎，近年來(lái)服務(wù)業(yè)集聚發(fā)展問(wèn)題也逐漸受到國(guó)內(nèi)學(xué)者的關(guān)注與重視。本研究在歸納產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚相關(guān)理論、產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚測(cè)度方法的應(yīng)用以及產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚效應(yīng)實(shí)證研究的基礎(chǔ)上，首先對(duì)我國(guó)服務(wù)業(yè)的集聚水平、城市經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展水平與差距的現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行度量與分析。然后分別構(gòu)建服務(wù)業(yè)專業(yè)化和多樣化集聚效應(yīng)的計(jì)量模型，運(yùn)用2003-2010年我國(guó)284個(gè)地級(jí)城市的面板數(shù)據(jù)檢驗(yàn)服務(wù)業(yè)集聚對(duì)城市經(jīng)濟(jì)的影響。在考察了全國(guó)服務(wù)業(yè)集聚效應(yīng)之后，再按照區(qū)域、城市規(guī)模的劃分，檢驗(yàn)集聚效應(yīng)的差異性，并試圖找到不同類型城市的最佳服務(wù)業(yè)集聚水平。通過(guò)實(shí)證檢驗(yàn)，本研究得出以下主要結(jié)論。 首先，服務(wù)業(yè)集聚水平的測(cè)度結(jié)果。服務(wù)業(yè)集聚水平低于工業(yè)，地級(jí)城市間存在區(qū)域和規(guī)模差異，且行業(yè)差異明顯。 其次，城市經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展水平與差距的測(cè)度結(jié)果。其一，城市經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展水平呈逐年上升趨勢(shì)，且存在區(qū)域和規(guī)模差異。其二，城市經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展差距呈緩慢下降趨勢(shì)，差距產(chǎn)生的因素主要是區(qū)域內(nèi)差異、第二產(chǎn)業(yè)的貢獻(xiàn)以及集中性效應(yīng)。 最后，服務(wù)業(yè)集聚效應(yīng)的差異性檢驗(yàn)結(jié)果。第一，全國(guó)范圍內(nèi)，專業(yè)化和多樣化的集聚效應(yīng)均為正。第二，分區(qū)域來(lái)看，專業(yè)化、多樣化集聚效應(yīng)為正，且區(qū)域之間存在差異。第三，分規(guī)模來(lái)看，專業(yè)化集聚效應(yīng)均為正，且大城市＞中小城市；而多樣化集聚效應(yīng)實(shí)證結(jié)果顯示，大城市為正，中小城市為負(fù)。第四，分區(qū)域分規(guī)模來(lái)看，服務(wù)業(yè)集聚對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的作用很大程度上取決于城市規(guī)模的大�。阂皇菍I(yè)化集聚效應(yīng)，所有城市的效應(yīng)均為正；二是多樣化集聚效應(yīng)，，所有區(qū)域的大城市集聚效應(yīng)為正，而中小城市集聚效應(yīng)為負(fù)。第五，不同類型城市的最優(yōu)集聚水平：東部、中部的大城市最優(yōu)專業(yè)化集聚水平分別為5.6053、25.5955；西部大城市的最優(yōu)專業(yè)化、多樣化集聚水平分別為2.4715、7.5415。
[Abstract]:The related research on industrial agglomeration mainly focused on manufacturing industry in the early stage. With the transformation of world economy from "industrial economy" to "service economy", the issue of service industry agglomeration has become the focus of scholars' attention.As for our country, the service industry is becoming a new engine of economic growth because of its higher and higher status in the national economy. In recent years, the agglomeration and development of service industry has been paid more and more attention by domestic scholars.On the basis of summarizing the relevant theories of industrial agglomeration, the application of industrial agglomeration measurement method and the empirical study of industrial agglomeration effect, this study firstly analyzes the agglomeration level of service industry in China.The present situation of urban economic development level and gap is measured and analyzed.Then the econometric model of service industry specialization and diversification agglomeration effect is constructed, and the panel data of 284 prefectural cities in China from 2003 to 2010 are used to test the effect of service industry agglomeration on urban economy.After examining the agglomeration effect of the national service industry, the paper tries to find out the best level of service agglomeration in different cities according to the division of the regional and urban scale, to test the difference of the agglomeration effect.Through empirical test, this study draws the following main conclusions.First, the measurement result of service industry agglomeration level.The level of service agglomeration is lower than that of industry, and there are regional and scale differences among prefectural cities.Second, the level of urban economic development and the measurement of the gap.First, the level of urban economic development is rising year by year, and there are regional and scale differences.Second, the gap of urban economic development shows a slow downward trend, the main factors of the gap are regional differences, the contribution of the secondary industry and the centralization effect.Finally, the difference test results of service agglomeration effect.First, nationwide, specialization and diversification of the agglomeration effect are positive.Secondly, the specialization, diversification and agglomeration effect are positive, and there are differences between regions.Thirdly, in terms of scale, the specialized agglomeration effect is positive, and the large city is > the small and medium-sized city, and the empirical result of diversification agglomeration effect shows that the large city is positive and the small city is negative.Fourthly, the effect of service agglomeration on economic development depends to a great extent on the size of the city: first, the effect of specialized agglomeration is positive, the effect of all cities is positive; the second is the effect of diversification agglomeration.The agglomeration effect of large cities in all regions is positive, while that of small and medium-sized cities is negative.Fifth, the optimal agglomeration level of different types of cities: in the east and in the middle, the optimal specialized agglomeration level is 5.6053 / 25.5955, and the optimal specialization and diversification agglomeration level in the western big cities are 2.4715 / 7.5415, respectively.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：重慶大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：F719;F299.23

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 祝新漢;;論中等城市經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展對(duì)人才發(fā)展的客觀要求[J];科學(xué)管理研究;1986年02期

2 劉艷;論現(xiàn)代港口是城市經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展新的增長(zhǎng)點(diǎn)[J];中國(guó)港口;2004年07期

3 徐林實(shí);;提高哈爾濱市綜合競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的對(duì)策研究[J];黑龍江社會(huì)科學(xué);2006年04期

4 欒曉梅;毛義友;;現(xiàn)代流通業(yè)與城市經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展關(guān)系分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)師;2007年08期

5 朱衛(wèi)江;杜錦錦;;發(fā)展新型城市經(jīng)濟(jì)是轉(zhuǎn)型升級(jí)的主攻方向和突破口——以杭州市的實(shí)踐為例[J];政策w

本文編號(hào)：1714599