發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-15 12:10

  本文選題：服務(wù)業(yè)　切入點(diǎn)：全要素生產(chǎn)率　出處：《山西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：近十幾年來(lái),全球外國(guó)直接投資的流入和流出規(guī)模迅速擴(kuò)大,尤其是服務(wù)業(yè)領(lǐng)域的投資規(guī)模呈現(xiàn)出強(qiáng)勁的上漲勢(shì)頭,全要素生產(chǎn)率的增長(zhǎng)作為提升服務(wù)業(yè)核心競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的關(guān)鍵,對(duì)服務(wù)業(yè)進(jìn)行對(duì)外直接投資起著至關(guān)重要的作用。目前對(duì)外直接投資領(lǐng)域已呈現(xiàn)出服務(wù)業(yè)為主的態(tài)勢(shì),而且從長(zhǎng)期來(lái)看,投資還會(huì)繼續(xù)流向服務(wù)業(yè)。服務(wù)業(yè)對(duì)外直接投資規(guī)模的日益擴(kuò)大,使其成為了學(xué)術(shù)界研究的熱點(diǎn)問(wèn)題。本文結(jié)合中國(guó)服務(wù)業(yè)對(duì)外直接投資發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀,選取了服務(wù)業(yè)中對(duì)外直接投資規(guī)模相對(duì)較大的11個(gè)行業(yè)進(jìn)行研究,從成本推動(dòng)型、出口拉動(dòng)型和行業(yè)協(xié)同發(fā)展型三類(lèi)對(duì)外直接投資的視角,系統(tǒng)分析了生產(chǎn)率對(duì)服務(wù)業(yè)對(duì)外直接投資的影響機(jī)制。同時(shí),本文運(yùn)用索洛余值法測(cè)算了中國(guó)服務(wù)業(yè)分行業(yè)全要素生產(chǎn)率的水平值,并分別對(duì)服務(wù)業(yè)全要素生產(chǎn)率與對(duì)外直接投資的發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行了描述性統(tǒng)計(jì)分析,簡(jiǎn)要梳理了二者可能存在的關(guān)系,發(fā)現(xiàn)服務(wù)業(yè)全要素生產(chǎn)率水平與其對(duì)外直接投資規(guī)�；境收嚓P(guān),這一分析為之后的實(shí)證研究奠定了經(jīng)驗(yàn)基礎(chǔ)�；谌厣a(chǎn)率與對(duì)外直接投資兩個(gè)變量間可能存在的內(nèi)生性問(wèn)題,本文選擇了系統(tǒng)GMM實(shí)證研究方法,分別從整體和細(xì)分行業(yè)的角度實(shí)證檢驗(yàn)了全要素生產(chǎn)率對(duì)服務(wù)業(yè)對(duì)外直接投資規(guī)模的影響,得到了較為顯著的檢驗(yàn)結(jié)果。從整體來(lái)看全要素生產(chǎn)率對(duì)服務(wù)業(yè)對(duì)外直接投資成正向效應(yīng),但全要素生產(chǎn)率并不是對(duì)外直接投資的唯一影響因素。從分行業(yè)的角度看,服務(wù)業(yè)的不同行業(yè)全要素生產(chǎn)率對(duì)其對(duì)外直接投資的影響也各有差異。因此本文根據(jù)實(shí)證檢驗(yàn)的結(jié)果從提升服務(wù)業(yè)全要素生產(chǎn)率水平以增強(qiáng)其國(guó)際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力、結(jié)合服務(wù)業(yè)生產(chǎn)率水平優(yōu)化其對(duì)外直接投資布局、借力生產(chǎn)率帶動(dòng)作用調(diào)整服務(wù)業(yè)對(duì)外直接投資結(jié)構(gòu)及發(fā)揮產(chǎn)業(yè)融合的協(xié)同效應(yīng)等方面對(duì)中國(guó)服務(wù)業(yè)對(duì)外直接投資的更好發(fā)展提出了相應(yīng)的對(duì)策建議。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the inflow and outflow of foreign direct investment (FDI) in the world has expanded rapidly, especially in the field of service industry. The growth of total factor productivity (TFP) is the key to enhance the core competitiveness of the service industry. Foreign direct investment in the service industry plays a vital role. At present, the field of foreign direct investment has taken on the trend of service industry, and in the long run, Investment will continue to flow to the service industry. With the increasing scale of FDI in the service industry, it has become a hot topic in academic research. This paper selects 11 industries with relatively large scale of FDI in the service industry to study from the perspective of three types of FDI: cost push type, export pull type and industry cooperative development type. This paper systematically analyzes the influence mechanism of productivity on foreign direct investment (FDI) of service industry. Meanwhile, this paper uses Solow residual value method to calculate the level of total factor productivity (TFP) of service industry in China. The paper also makes a descriptive statistical analysis on the development of total factor productivity (TFP) and foreign direct investment (FDI) in the service industry, and briefly analyzes the possible relationship between the two. It is found that there is a positive correlation between the total factor productivity level and the scale of FDI in the service industry. This analysis lays an empirical foundation for subsequent empirical research. Based on the possible endogenous problems between TFP and OFDI, this paper chooses the systematic GMM empirical research method. The impact of total factor productivity (TFP) on the scale of FDI in the service industry is tested from the perspective of the whole and subdivision industries, respectively. The results show that TFP has a positive effect on FDI, but TFP is not the only factor influencing FDI. The impact of TFP on FDI is different in different industries of service industry. Therefore, according to the results of empirical test, this paper improves the TFP level of service industry in order to enhance its international competitiveness. Combining the productivity level of the service industry to optimize its outward direct investment, In this paper, the author puts forward some countermeasures and suggestions for the better development of China's foreign direct investment of service industry from the aspects of adjusting the structure of foreign direct investment of service industry and giving full play to the synergistic effect of industry convergence.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F719;F125

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王恕立;滕澤偉;劉軍;;中國(guó)服務(wù)業(yè)生產(chǎn)率變動(dòng)的差異分析——基于區(qū)域及行業(yè)視角[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2015年08期

2 柳荻;尹恒;;企業(yè)全要素生產(chǎn)率估計(jì)新方法——全要素生產(chǎn)率估計(jì)的結(jié)構(gòu)方法及其應(yīng)用[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)動(dòng)態(tài);2015年07期

3 李蕾;趙忠秀;;中國(guó)對(duì)外直接投資企業(yè)生產(chǎn)率影響因素研究[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易問(wèn)題;2015年06期

4 姜永宏;蔣偉杰;;中國(guó)上市商業(yè)銀行效率和全要素生產(chǎn)率研究——基于Hicks-Moorsteen TFP指數(shù)的一個(gè)分析框架[J];中國(guó)工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2014年09期

5 蔣冠宏;蔣殿春;;中國(guó)工業(yè)企業(yè)對(duì)外直接投資與企業(yè)生產(chǎn)率進(jìn)步[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì);2014年09期

6 嚴(yán)兵;張禹;韓劍;;企業(yè)異質(zhì)性與對(duì)外直接投資——基于江蘇省企業(yè)的檢驗(yàn)[J];南開(kāi)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2014年04期

7 陳景華;;企業(yè)異質(zhì)性、全要素生產(chǎn)率與服務(wù)業(yè)對(duì)外直接投資——基于服務(wù)業(yè)行業(yè)和企業(yè)數(shù)據(jù)的實(shí)證檢驗(yàn)[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易問(wèn)題;2014年07期

8 王恕立;劉軍;;中國(guó)服務(wù)企業(yè)生產(chǎn)率異質(zhì)性與資源再配置效應(yīng)——與制造業(yè)企業(yè)相同嗎?[J];數(shù)量經(jīng)濟(jì)技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2014年05期

9 陳景華;;服務(wù)業(yè)全要素生產(chǎn)率與服務(wù)貿(mào)易出口——基于新新貿(mào)易理論的視角[J];山東財(cái)政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年01期

10 溫磊;;中國(guó)對(duì)外直接投資決定因素的實(shí)證研究[J];山西大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：1615967