本文選題：生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)　切入點(diǎn)：集聚　出處：《南京師范大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：隨著世界經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展,服務(wù)業(yè)在整個(gè)經(jīng)濟(jì)體系中所占比重越來(lái)越大,尤其是生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)在各大城市逐漸集聚并成為支柱產(chǎn)業(yè),為經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)注入新的動(dòng)力�？梢哉f(shuō),生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)的發(fā)展水平已經(jīng)成為國(guó)家綜合競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的一個(gè)重要指標(biāo)。在對(duì)生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)的諸多研究中,集聚問(wèn)題逐漸成為熱點(diǎn),但已有的制造業(yè)集聚研究范式并不能夠直接運(yùn)用到生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)集聚研究中去,生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)集聚在研究框架、研究手段等方面仍然存在不足之處。 本文選取江蘇地區(qū)為研究對(duì)象,在制造業(yè)集聚的基礎(chǔ)上研究生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)集聚,并對(duì)生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)集聚的理論基礎(chǔ)進(jìn)行了梳理,對(duì)生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)集聚的特征進(jìn)行了歸納。在研究江蘇生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)集聚過(guò)程和現(xiàn)狀之后,從整體和分行業(yè)兩個(gè)角度分析了江蘇地區(qū)生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)集聚及空間分布情況,并探討了江蘇生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)集聚的主要影響因素,通過(guò)面板數(shù)據(jù)模型進(jìn)行了實(shí)證分析,得出結(jié)論：一,江蘇地區(qū)生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展較快,就業(yè)人數(shù)增長(zhǎng)率也呈逐年上升的趨勢(shì),但與浙江、廣東、上海等省市相比,無(wú)論是產(chǎn)業(yè)增加值還是生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)就業(yè)人數(shù)占總就業(yè)人數(shù)比重,都還有一段距離。另外,本文計(jì)算出的江蘇2003-2010年生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)區(qū)位商值呈現(xiàn)逐年下降趨勢(shì),這在一定程度上說(shuō)明生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)的集聚化程度正在降低,由集聚向均衡發(fā)展;然而集聚度的降低有著產(chǎn)業(yè)和政策的雙方面原因,并不意味著生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展水平降低。二,實(shí)證結(jié)果表明,人均GDP、第三產(chǎn)業(yè)占GDP比重、地方財(cái)政科學(xué)事業(yè)費(fèi)支出、高等學(xué)校專任教師數(shù)這幾個(gè)因素對(duì)生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)集聚有顯著影響。這四個(gè)因素分別代表經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)、產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)、政府規(guī)模以及人力資源,其中經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)、產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)、人力資源跟生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)集聚度呈現(xiàn)正相關(guān),而政府規(guī)模和生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)集聚度呈現(xiàn)負(fù)相關(guān)。這說(shuō)明經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)、消費(fèi)性服務(wù)業(yè)增長(zhǎng)、人力資源投入能夠提高生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)集聚度；而政府規(guī)模指標(biāo)為負(fù)說(shuō)明行政干預(yù)過(guò)度反而會(huì)對(duì)生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)集聚度起到反向作用。另外,信息化程度、金融環(huán)境、城市規(guī)模、工業(yè)化程度、基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施和資本流量這幾個(gè)指標(biāo)是不顯著的,其中既有指標(biāo)本身選取不夠合理的原因,也有現(xiàn)實(shí)原因。最后本文在實(shí)證結(jié)論的基礎(chǔ)上提出了一些政策建議,一方面政府在引導(dǎo)生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展時(shí)要注意降低行業(yè)準(zhǔn)入門檻,尤其要大力加強(qiáng)人才建設(shè),鼓勵(lì)中小型生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)企業(yè)發(fā)展,以此來(lái)帶動(dòng)集聚的形成；另一方面也要注意行政干預(yù)適度,以政策引導(dǎo)生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)集聚區(qū)的建設(shè),而不是人為地設(shè)立集聚區(qū)。
[Abstract]:With the development of the world economy, the service industry accounts for more and more in the whole economic system, especially the producer service industry gradually agglomeration and become the pillar industry in the major cities, which injects new impetus to the economic growth. The development level of producer services has become an important indicator of national comprehensive competitiveness. However, the existing research paradigm of manufacturing agglomeration can not be directly applied to the study of producer services agglomeration, and there are still shortcomings in the research framework and research means. This paper selects Jiangsu as the research object, studies producer service industry agglomeration on the basis of manufacturing agglomeration, and combs the theoretical basis of producer service agglomeration. After studying the process and present situation of producer service agglomeration in Jiangsu province, the paper analyzes the agglomeration and spatial distribution of producer service industry in Jiangsu from two angles of whole and sub-industry. The paper also discusses the main influencing factors of producer services agglomeration in Jiangsu Province, and makes empirical analysis through panel data model. The conclusions are as follows: first, the producer services industry in Jiangsu region is developing rapidly, and the employment growth rate is also increasing year by year. However, compared with Zhejiang, Guangdong, Shanghai and other provinces and cities, both the value added of industries and the proportion of the number of people employed in producer services in the total number of employed people are still some distance. In addition, The calculated location quotient of producer services in Jiangsu Province from 2003 to 2010 shows a decreasing trend year by year, which indicates to a certain extent that the degree of concentration of producer services is decreasing and developing from agglomeration to equilibrium. However, the decrease in convergence is due to both industry and policy, and does not mean that the level of development of producer services is lower. Second, the empirical results show that per capita GDP, the proportion of tertiary industry to GDP, the expenditure of local financial science and business expenses, The number of full-time teachers in institutions of higher learning has a significant impact on the agglomeration of producer services. These four factors represent economic growth, industrial structure, government size and human resources, including economic growth and industrial structure. There is a positive correlation between human resources and the concentration of producer services, but a negative correlation between the scale of government and the concentration of producer services. Human resource investment can improve the concentration of producer services, while the government scale index is negative indicating that excessive administrative intervention will reverse the concentration of producer services. In addition, the degree of information, the financial environment, the scale of the city, the degree of information, the financial environment, the scale of the city, The degree of industrialization, infrastructure and capital flow are not significant, among which there are not reasonable reasons for the selection of indicators themselves, but also practical reasons. Finally, this paper puts forward some policy recommendations on the basis of empirical conclusions. On the one hand, the government should pay attention to lowering the entry threshold of producer services, especially to strengthen the construction of talents, encourage the development of small and medium-sized producer services enterprises, so as to promote the formation of agglomeration; On the other hand, we should pay attention to the moderate administrative intervention and use policy to guide the construction of producer service agglomeration area, not to set up the agglomeration area artificially.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：F719

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 王忠平;史常亮;鄒昊;;江蘇省就業(yè)人數(shù)與三大產(chǎn)業(yè)產(chǎn)值關(guān)系實(shí)證分析[J];工業(yè)技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì);2011年05期

2 張鳳杰;張立;陳繼祥;;生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)集群化發(fā)展動(dòng)因研究[J];科技進(jìn)步與對(duì)策;2008年12期

3 鐘韻,閻小培;我國(guó)生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)與經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展關(guān)系研究[J];人文地理;2003年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：1581130