建筑物區(qū)分所有權(quán)問(wèn)題研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-09-18 06:29
【摘要】：隨著我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)的快速發(fā)展,城市化進(jìn)程不斷加快,城市居民區(qū)建設(shè)用地資源愈顯稀缺并致其價(jià)格日漸高漲,于是,多層乃至高層建筑也就成為了房地產(chǎn)開(kāi)發(fā)的主要選擇,而單一建筑物分成不同部分并分別為住戶們專有所有和共有的現(xiàn)象,即建筑物區(qū)分所有,也更加常見(jiàn)。這種現(xiàn)象的大規(guī)模集中出現(xiàn),使得建筑物區(qū)分所有權(quán)人與房地產(chǎn)開(kāi)發(fā)商以及建筑物區(qū)分所有權(quán)人之間的糾紛也日趨頻繁和復(fù)雜。2007年10月1日正式施行的《物權(quán)法》在立法層面取得了一定成就,其第六章首次以專章的形式對(duì)建筑物區(qū)分所有權(quán)制度內(nèi)容以及區(qū)分所有權(quán)人的權(quán)利義務(wù)進(jìn)行了基本規(guī)定,以往在建筑物區(qū)分所有權(quán)制度方面無(wú)法可依的局面得到改善。然而,其本身卻暴露出部分概念內(nèi)涵不夠明晰以及個(gè)別法律規(guī)定存在邏輯矛盾等方面的不足。2009年最高人民法院針對(duì)相關(guān)問(wèn)題先后出臺(tái)了兩部司法解釋,在一定程度上解決了相關(guān)問(wèn)題,但在復(fù)雜多樣的現(xiàn)實(shí)情況面前,《物權(quán)法》及其相關(guān)解釋仍稍顯籠統(tǒng)而有待完善。 為厘清我國(guó)建筑物區(qū)分所有權(quán)制度的問(wèn)題所在,首先從建筑物區(qū)分所有權(quán)的基本理論入手,對(duì)其概念、特征及構(gòu)成加以介紹,繼而運(yùn)用歷史比較的方法簡(jiǎn)要考證了建筑物區(qū)分所有權(quán)制度的歷史沿革；在此基礎(chǔ)上,分別對(duì)建筑物區(qū)分所有權(quán)的專有權(quán)、共有權(quán)以及相鄰權(quán)與成員權(quán)方面基本問(wèn)題加以闡述；最后分析我國(guó)建筑物區(qū)分所有權(quán)制度的構(gòu)建及完善,在肯定現(xiàn)階段《物權(quán)法》及相關(guān)解釋在建構(gòu)建筑物區(qū)分所有權(quán)制度框架方面的重要成就以及采復(fù)合要素說(shuō)的合理性同時(shí),針對(duì)個(gè)別法律規(guī)定在區(qū)分所有權(quán)人間的相鄰關(guān)系、共有范圍界定、共有權(quán)行使等方面所存在的過(guò)于籠統(tǒng)以及內(nèi)在邏輯矛盾等方面問(wèn)題,分別提出相應(yīng)的完善建議,以期對(duì)未來(lái)立法進(jìn)一步完善相關(guān)制度有所助益。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of our economy and the accelerating process of urbanization, the more scarce the construction land resources in urban residential areas are and the higher their prices are, the multi-storey and even high-rise buildings have become the main choice of real estate development. It is also more common that a single building is divided into separate parts and is owned and shared by the occupants. The massive concentration of this phenomenon, The disputes between the building owners and the real estate developers and the owners of the buildings are becoming more and more frequent and complex. On October 1, 2007, the Real right Law has made some achievements in the legislative level. The sixth chapter for the first time in the form of a special chapter on the content of the system of differentiated ownership of buildings and the rights and obligations of the differentiated owners of the basic provisions in the past in the system of building ownership of the situation can not be improved. However, it itself reveals that some of the concepts are not clear enough and that there are logical contradictions in individual laws and regulations. In 2009, the Supreme people's Court issued two judicial interpretations in response to related issues. To a certain extent, the related problems have been solved, but in the face of complicated and diverse reality, the property Law and its related interpretations are still slightly general and need to be improved. In order to clarify the problems in the system of building ownership in China, this paper begins with the basic theory of building ownership and introduces its concept, characteristics and composition. Then the historical evolution of the building ownership system is briefly studied by the method of historical comparison, on the basis of which, the basic problems of the exclusive right, the common right, the adjacent right and the member right of the building division ownership are expounded respectively. Finally, this paper analyzes the construction and perfection of the system of building condominium ownership in our country, and affirms the important achievements and the rationality of adopting the theory of compound elements in the construction of the framework of the system of building condominium ownership at the present stage of the Real right Law and related explanations. In the light of the problems existing in the definition of the common scope, the exercise of the common right and the inherent logic contradiction, the corresponding suggestions are put forward to improve the relationship between the owners, the definition of the common scope and the exercise of the common right. With a view to the future legislation to further improve the relevant system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D923.2
本文編號(hào)：2247067
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of our economy and the accelerating process of urbanization, the more scarce the construction land resources in urban residential areas are and the higher their prices are, the multi-storey and even high-rise buildings have become the main choice of real estate development. It is also more common that a single building is divided into separate parts and is owned and shared by the occupants. The massive concentration of this phenomenon, The disputes between the building owners and the real estate developers and the owners of the buildings are becoming more and more frequent and complex. On October 1, 2007, the Real right Law has made some achievements in the legislative level. The sixth chapter for the first time in the form of a special chapter on the content of the system of differentiated ownership of buildings and the rights and obligations of the differentiated owners of the basic provisions in the past in the system of building ownership of the situation can not be improved. However, it itself reveals that some of the concepts are not clear enough and that there are logical contradictions in individual laws and regulations. In 2009, the Supreme people's Court issued two judicial interpretations in response to related issues. To a certain extent, the related problems have been solved, but in the face of complicated and diverse reality, the property Law and its related interpretations are still slightly general and need to be improved. In order to clarify the problems in the system of building ownership in China, this paper begins with the basic theory of building ownership and introduces its concept, characteristics and composition. Then the historical evolution of the building ownership system is briefly studied by the method of historical comparison, on the basis of which, the basic problems of the exclusive right, the common right, the adjacent right and the member right of the building division ownership are expounded respectively. Finally, this paper analyzes the construction and perfection of the system of building condominium ownership in our country, and affirms the important achievements and the rationality of adopting the theory of compound elements in the construction of the framework of the system of building condominium ownership at the present stage of the Real right Law and related explanations. In the light of the problems existing in the definition of the common scope, the exercise of the common right and the inherent logic contradiction, the corresponding suggestions are put forward to improve the relationship between the owners, the definition of the common scope and the exercise of the common right. With a view to the future legislation to further improve the relevant system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D923.2
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 王利明;;論業(yè)主的建筑物區(qū)分所有權(quán)的概念[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2006年05期
2 崔建遠(yuǎn);;對(duì)業(yè)主的建筑物區(qū)分所有權(quán)之共有部分的具體考察[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2008年03期
3 楊冉;;建筑物區(qū)分所有權(quán)若干問(wèn)題的探析[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(中旬刊);2011年07期
4 陳華彬;;論建筑物區(qū)分所有權(quán)的概念[J];法治研究;2010年07期
5 胡文華;;論建筑物區(qū)分所有權(quán)制度[J];經(jīng)營(yíng)管理者;2008年11期
6 陳華彬;;建筑物區(qū)分所有權(quán):學(xué)者草案的立場(chǎng)與《物權(quán)法》的規(guī)定[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年02期
7 陳志鳳;;《物權(quán)法》中建筑物區(qū)分所有權(quán)制度缺陷初探[J];廣州廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2010年04期
8 戴紅星;;建筑物區(qū)分所有權(quán)的物權(quán)分析[J];才智;2011年12期
9 陳華彬;;業(yè)主的建筑物區(qū)分所有權(quán) 評(píng)《物權(quán)法草案》第六章[J];中外法學(xué);2006年01期
10 張力滿;;建筑物區(qū)分所有權(quán)相關(guān)問(wèn)題探討[J];知識(shí)經(jīng)濟(jì);2008年09期
，本文編號(hào)：2247067
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/fangdichanjingjilunwen/2247067.html
最近更新
教材專著
