【摘要】：預(yù)購商品房轉(zhuǎn)讓,是指商品房預(yù)購法律關(guān)系中的預(yù)購人將尚未竣工驗(yàn)收合格的商品房再行轉(zhuǎn)讓的法律行為。我國對預(yù)購商品房轉(zhuǎn)讓行為并沒有制定相關(guān)的法律或行政法規(guī),《房地產(chǎn)管理法》第四十六條授予國務(wù)院對預(yù)購商品房轉(zhuǎn)讓進(jìn)行規(guī)定的權(quán)利。2005年4月30日,國務(wù)院七部門聯(lián)合發(fā)布了《關(guān)于做好穩(wěn)定住房價(jià)格工作的意見》,禁止商品房預(yù)購人將購買的未竣工的預(yù)售商品房再行轉(zhuǎn)讓。《關(guān)于做好穩(wěn)定住房價(jià)格工作的意見》對司法實(shí)踐產(chǎn)生了較大的影響,有不少法官據(jù)此認(rèn)為預(yù)購商品房轉(zhuǎn)讓合同無效,且受讓人不具有進(jìn)行權(quán)屬登記的權(quán)利。筆者不贊成以上觀點(diǎn),并對這類觀點(diǎn)進(jìn)行了批判。筆者認(rèn)為,預(yù)購商品房轉(zhuǎn)讓交易類型復(fù)雜,不同的交易類型中當(dāng)事人的法律關(guān)系、負(fù)擔(dān)行為和處分行為的內(nèi)容也大相徑庭,需要深入研究,才能正確地適用法律。本文第一部分介紹了預(yù)購商品房轉(zhuǎn)讓糾紛產(chǎn)生的背景及問題焦點(diǎn)。本文第二部分結(jié)合具體的司法案例,對預(yù)購商品房轉(zhuǎn)讓合同效力、受讓人是否有申請權(quán)屬登記權(quán)利的爭議進(jìn)行了具體的歸納整理。本文第三部分首先論證了預(yù)購商品房轉(zhuǎn)讓合同的有效性,然后對不同交易類型的預(yù)購商品房轉(zhuǎn)讓中的法律關(guān)系進(jìn)行剖析,最后對受讓人是否具有申請權(quán)屬登記的權(quán)利進(jìn)行分析和論證。本文第四部分就預(yù)購商品房轉(zhuǎn)讓行為的效力、受讓人面臨合同履行問題時(shí)如何處理提出了法律適用建議。本文的第五部分是結(jié)語,簡單總結(jié)了這篇文章的所有論點(diǎn)。
[Abstract]:Advance purchase of commercial housing transfer, refers to the legal relationship in the advance purchase of commercial housing buyers will not have completed the acceptance of the commercial housing transfer again. China has not formulated relevant laws or administrative regulations on the transfer of pre-purchased commercial housing. Article 46 of the Real Estate Management Law grants the State Council the right to stipulate the transfer of pre-purchased commercial housing. The seven departments of the State Council jointly issued the opinions on doing a good job in stabilizing Housing prices, prohibiting the retransfer of unfinished pre-sold commercial housing purchased by advance purchasers of commercial housing. < opinions on doing a good job in stabilizing Housing prices] Has had a great impact on judicial practice, According to this, many judges hold that the contract of transfer of pre-purchase commercial housing is null and void, and the transferee does not have the right to register the title. The author disagrees with the above views and criticizes them. The author believes that the transaction types of pre-purchase commercial housing transfer are complicated, and the legal relationship, burden behavior and disposition behavior of the parties in different transaction types are also very different, so we need to study deeply in order to apply the law correctly. The first part of this paper introduces the background and focus of the disputes over the transfer of pre-purchase commercial housing. The second part of this paper combined with the specific judicial cases, the transfer contract effectiveness of pre-purchase commercial housing, whether the transferee has the right to apply for ownership registration dispute has been concretely summarized and sorted. The third part of this paper first demonstrates the validity of the contract for the transfer of pre-purchase commercial housing, and then analyzes the legal relationship in the transfer of pre-purchase commercial housing of different types of transactions. Finally, whether the transferee has the right to apply for ownership registration is analyzed and proved. In the fourth part, the author puts forward some suggestions on how to deal with the problem of the transferee when facing the problem of contract performance. The fifth part of this paper is the conclusion, briefly summarizes all the arguments of this article.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D922.29

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 申光偉;;解除商品房買賣合同訴訟中擔(dān)保貸款合同的處理模式[J];人民司法(應(yīng)用);2016年25期

2 朱慶育;;《合同法》第52條第5項(xiàng)評注[J];法學(xué)家;2016年03期

3 奚曉明,曹士兵,金劍鋒;擔(dān)保法司法解釋中的幾個(gè)重要問題[J];人民司法;2001年01期

，

本文編號：2228749