【摘要】：不動(dòng)產(chǎn)預(yù)告登記,是指為保全一項(xiàng)以將來發(fā)生不動(dòng)產(chǎn)物權(quán)變動(dòng)為目的的債權(quán)請(qǐng)求權(quán),由請(qǐng)求權(quán)人向登記機(jī)關(guān)申請(qǐng)而進(jìn)行的預(yù)先登記。這恰恰是與本登記相對(duì)應(yīng)的一種制度。由于預(yù)告登記所保全的請(qǐng)求權(quán)是一種物權(quán)化的債權(quán)請(qǐng)求權(quán),經(jīng)過預(yù)告登記之后,在向本登記推進(jìn)的過程中,若預(yù)告登記義務(wù)人對(duì)不動(dòng)產(chǎn)所進(jìn)行的處分與之前的預(yù)告登記相沖突,那么此處分不發(fā)生物權(quán)效力。就我國(guó)司法實(shí)踐而言,雖然《物權(quán)法》、《城市房地產(chǎn)管理法》、《土地登記辦法》、《房屋登記辦法》以及其他地方性法律中對(duì)預(yù)告登記制度作了界定,但這些規(guī)定大多是概括性的規(guī)定,不具有實(shí)際可操作性。而且我國(guó)尚未制定統(tǒng)一的不動(dòng)產(chǎn)登記法,確立統(tǒng)一的登記機(jī)關(guān),完善具體的程序。本文主要采用文獻(xiàn)分析、規(guī)范分析和案例分析方法,以房屋這一典型不動(dòng)產(chǎn)為主要分析對(duì)象,對(duì)不動(dòng)產(chǎn)預(yù)告登記制度的概念、性質(zhì)、效力、我國(guó)的立法現(xiàn)狀等方面進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)的分析,進(jìn)而指出我國(guó)當(dāng)前立法的不足,以期對(duì)我國(guó)不動(dòng)產(chǎn)登記法的制定有所裨益。本文主要分為三個(gè)部分:不動(dòng)產(chǎn)預(yù)告登記制度的基礎(chǔ)理論、我國(guó)不動(dòng)產(chǎn)預(yù)告登記制度的立法現(xiàn)狀、完善我國(guó)不動(dòng)產(chǎn)預(yù)告登記制度的立法建議。第一部分基于預(yù)告登記的基礎(chǔ)理論,介紹了預(yù)告登記的概念、與本登記等相關(guān)概念的比較,闡述了預(yù)告登記的性質(zhì)為物權(quán)化的債權(quán),其包括保全物權(quán)實(shí)現(xiàn)、保全順位、排除破產(chǎn)和強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行程序三方面的法律效力。第二部分基于當(dāng)前我國(guó)不動(dòng)產(chǎn)預(yù)告登記制度的立法現(xiàn)狀。以2007年《物權(quán)法》的頒布施行為分水嶺,對(duì)07年以前的商品房預(yù)售合同登記備案制度進(jìn)行了分析,并將其與預(yù)告登記制度作了比較,突出了預(yù)告登記制度的優(yōu)越性。還對(duì)2007年《物權(quán)法》中的相關(guān)規(guī)定、2008年《土地登記辦法》和《房屋登記辦法》中的相關(guān)規(guī)定進(jìn)行了評(píng)析。第三部分明確指出了我國(guó)預(yù)告登記制度在實(shí)踐中存在的問題,如不動(dòng)產(chǎn)登記法律制度不統(tǒng)一、登記機(jī)關(guān)不統(tǒng)一、登記程序不完善等。對(duì)我國(guó)不動(dòng)產(chǎn)登記制度的建立健全提出了幾點(diǎn)可行性的建議,具體涉及制定統(tǒng)一的不動(dòng)產(chǎn)登記法、確立統(tǒng)一的登記機(jī)關(guān)、完善相應(yīng)的操作流程。最后對(duì)全文的論述進(jìn)行了簡(jiǎn)要回顧并作了總結(jié)。
[Abstract]:The notice registration of immovable property refers to the pre-registration of a claim for the purpose of preserving a claim for the purpose of the change of real property right in the future, which is applied by the claimant to the registration authority. This is precisely a system corresponding to this registration. Since the right of claim preserved by notice registration is a claim of real right, after notice registration, in the course of advancing this registration, if the disposition of the notice registration obligor to the immovable property conflicts with the prior notice registration, So here does not produce real right effect. As far as the judicial practice of our country is concerned, although the property Law, the Urban Real Estate Management Law, the Land Registration method, the Housing Registration method and other local laws define the notice registration system, most of these provisions are general provisions. No practical maneuverability. Moreover, our country has not yet formulated a unified real estate registration law, established a unified registration authority, and improved specific procedures. This article mainly uses the literature analysis, the normative analysis and the case analysis method, taking the house as the typical real estate as the main analysis object, to the real estate advance notice registration system concept, the nature, the validity, This paper makes a systematic analysis on the current legislation of our country and points out the deficiency of our current legislation in order to benefit the establishment of the real estate registration law in our country. This paper is divided into three parts: the basic theory of the real estate advance registration system, the legislation status of the real estate advance notice registration system in our country, and the legislative suggestions to perfect the real estate advance notice registration system in our country. The first part, based on the basic theory of notice registration, introduces the concept of notice registration, compares with the related concepts such as this registration, and expounds that the nature of notice registration is the creditor's right of real right, which includes the realization of preservation of real right, the preservation of order, etc. To exclude the legal effect of bankruptcy and enforcement procedures. The second part is based on the current legislation of China's real estate registration system. Taking the promulgation and implementation of the Real right Law in 2007 as a watershed, this paper analyzes the registration and filing system of commercial housing pre-sale contracts before 2007, and compares it with the notice registration system, which highlights the superiority of the pre-sale contract registration system. It also analyzes the relevant provisions of the Real right Law in 2007, the Land Registration method in 2008 and the Housing Registration method in 2008. The third part clearly points out the problems existing in the practice of the notice registration system in our country, such as the immovable property registration law system is not unified, the registration authority is not unified, the registration procedure is not perfect and so on. This paper puts forward some feasible suggestions for the establishment and perfection of the real estate registration system in China, including the establishment of a unified real estate registration law, the establishment of a unified registration authority, and the perfection of the corresponding operation process. Finally, a brief review of the full text of the discussion and made a summary.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)青年政治學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D923.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 楊雪飛;;預(yù)告登記制度比較考察[J];河北法學(xué);2006年11期

2 侯國(guó)躍;;論不動(dòng)產(chǎn)預(yù)告登記——以我國(guó)《物權(quán)法》第20條為中心[J];河北法學(xué);2011年02期

3 孫鵬;不動(dòng)產(chǎn)預(yù)告登記[J];法治論叢;2003年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：2191177