本文選題：公職人員 + 非公職人員　； 參考：《太原科技大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：經(jīng)濟犯罪作為社會進步的巨大毒瘤，時刻威脅著經(jīng)濟和社會的健康發(fā)展。公職人員作為國家職權的重要執(zhí)行者，掌握和擁有大量的公共資源和相對的控制權，其經(jīng)濟犯罪嚴重影響著干群關系和執(zhí)政黨的地位。民營企業(yè)家作為社會經(jīng)濟發(fā)展過程中的領軍人物，其經(jīng)濟犯罪不僅造成巨大的經(jīng)濟損失，影響員工就業(yè)，而且破壞正常的經(jīng)濟秩序。大量案例表明，兩者的經(jīng)濟犯罪大多都是以經(jīng)濟利益為主要目標，并且均不同程度的存在官商勾結、權錢交易的現(xiàn)象，雖有顯著差異，，但也存在一定的聯(lián)系。因此，本文以對比的視角對兩者的經(jīng)濟犯罪進行研究，得出以下結論。 （1）通過搜集整理近年來部分經(jīng)濟犯罪的案例，對個體和犯罪屬性的多個指標進行描述性統(tǒng)計分析，得出目前我國公職人員和以民營企業(yè)家為代表的非公職人員經(jīng)濟犯罪特征：官商勾結現(xiàn)象嚴重，尤其在公職人員經(jīng)濟犯罪中更常見；公職人員的經(jīng)濟犯罪類型主要為受賄，多發(fā)于政府機關和國土城建等權力和資源集中的壟斷部門，而非公職人員的犯罪則主要集中在房地產(chǎn)和金融業(yè)，案發(fā)原因多是融資和企業(yè)經(jīng)營，體現(xiàn)了公職人員權力缺乏監(jiān)督濫用權力獲利，而非公職人員則由于管理缺失、弄虛作假、非法經(jīng)營牟取暴利等特征。 （2）在對四個公職與非公職人員經(jīng)濟犯罪典型案例分析的基礎上，結合行為管理科學的理論成果得出不法人員經(jīng)濟犯罪的行為機理；根據(jù)經(jīng)濟犯罪行為機理和目前對公職與非公職人員經(jīng)濟犯罪研究現(xiàn)狀的總結和概括，從宏觀、中觀、微觀三個層面對兩者經(jīng)濟犯罪的影響因素進行全面的對比分析；最后將公職人員可觀測的六個個體屬性指標和犯罪類型進行Logistics回歸，結果表明：成長環(huán)境、受教育程度、年齡、級別以及公職類型會影響公職人員的受賄犯罪類型，影響力大小依次為：級別、受教育程度、成長環(huán)境、年齡和公職類型。 （3）基于前景理論對兩者的經(jīng)濟犯罪決策過程進行對比分析，結果顯示：兩者的經(jīng)濟犯罪是風險追求的結果，且非公職人員比公職人員更冒險，參考點更高，犯罪金額更多；在特定的損失厭惡系數(shù)和監(jiān)督懲罰條件下，增加公職人員既有財產(chǎn)和未來收益，對于減少腐敗和和降低其危害更加有效，但不總是有效的；只有加強監(jiān)督懲罰機制，才能從根本上抑制兩者的經(jīng)濟犯罪；損失厭惡系數(shù)是影響兩者經(jīng)濟犯罪的共同因素，但控制公職人員的損失厭惡系數(shù)更可行。 （4）在分析了房地產(chǎn)洗錢風險和房地產(chǎn)開發(fā)、交易兩環(huán)節(jié)的主要洗錢手段之后，對公職和非公職人員的洗錢行為進行對比和原因分析，結果顯示：不法公職人員注重安全效用，常常選取能在短時間內(nèi)完成的房地產(chǎn)交易活動洗錢，具有較強的隱蔽性；而非公職人員注重則注重收益最大化的效用，主要通過將非法資金注入企業(yè)經(jīng)營，通過虛假報賬的方式進行洗錢，具有較強的欺騙性。 最后針對兩者經(jīng)濟犯罪的共同特征和各自不同的犯罪特征提出對策建議，希望可以為相關部門預防和減少經(jīng)濟犯罪提供決策支持。
[Abstract]:As an important performer of social progress , economic crime threatens the healthy development of economy and society . As an important performer in the development of society , public officials have a lot of public resources and relative control , and their economic crimes have a serious impact on the relationship between cadres and groups and the status of the ruling party .

( 1 ) By collecting and arranging some cases of economic crimes in recent years , a descriptive statistical analysis of multiple indexes of individual and crime attributes is carried out , and it is concluded that the phenomenon of economic crime of non - public officials represented by public officials and private entrepreneurs in our country is serious , especially in public official economic crimes ;
The types of economic crimes of public officials are mainly passive bribery . The crimes of non - public officials mainly focus on real estate and finance , and the reasons for non - public officials are mainly in real estate and finance industry .

( 2 ) Based on the analysis of the typical cases of four official and non - public official economic crimes , the author derives the behavioral mechanism of illegal personnel economic crime based on the theoretical results of behavioral management science .
According to the mechanism of economic crimes and the current research situation of public and non - public official economic crimes , a comprehensive comparative analysis is made on the factors of economic crime from macro , meso and microcosmic levels .
Finally , six individual attribute indexes and types of crime can be observed by public officials . The results show that : the growth environment , the degree of education , the age , the level and the type of public service can influence the types of bribery crime of public officials . The size of influence is in turn : level , degree of education , growth environment , age and public service type .

( 3 ) Based on the comparative analysis of the economic crime decision - making process of the two , the results show that the economic crime is the result of the risk pursuit , and the non - public officer is more risk - taking than the public officer , the reference point is higher and the crime amount is more ;
Increasing the existing property and future earnings of public officials under specific loss aversion and supervisory penalties is not always effective in reducing corruption and reducing its harm ;
Only by strengthening the supervision and punishment mechanism can the economic crime of the two can be fundamentally suppressed ;
Loss aversion coefficient is a common factor affecting both economic crimes , but it is more feasible to control the loss aversion coefficient of public officials .

( 4 ) After analyzing the risk of real estate money laundering and the main money laundering in real estate development and transaction , the author compares and analyzes the money laundering behavior of public and non - public officials .
Non - public officials pay attention to the utility of maximization of earnings , mainly by injecting illegal funds into enterprises , and carrying out money - laundering through false accounting .

Finally , the author puts forward some suggestions on the common characteristics of the two economic crimes and the different characteristics of the crime , and hopes that the decision - making support can be provided for the prevention and reduction of economic crime in the relevant departments .
【學位授予單位】：太原科技大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D630.9

【參考文獻】

中國期刊全文數(shù)據(jù)庫 前10條

1 黃友;張騰文;;雙重預算約束下的消費者最優(yōu)選擇[J];財政研究;2007年08期

2 魏景柱,關開澄,李春華;效用現(xiàn)值模型及其在反腐敗行為中的應用[J];大慶石油學院學報;2004年02期

3 張濤;;政府高官受賄腐敗的特征——基于76個受賄罪案的實證研究[J];當代中國政治研究報告;2011年00期

4 謝端純;;房地產(chǎn)行業(yè)反洗錢可疑資金監(jiān)測模型研究[J];南方金融;2010年01期

5 左運光;;建立房地產(chǎn)行業(yè)反洗錢監(jiān)測和管理機制的實務性研究[J];南方金融;2011年09期

6 龍朝陽;田銀華;;腐敗行為及其治理選擇——基于前景理論的研究[J];公共管理學報;2008年04期

7 嚴立新;;中國反洗錢戰(zhàn)略(2013～2018)的升級轉型及其實施機制的建立[J];管理世界;2013年09期

8 吳航;;房地產(chǎn)領域經(jīng)濟犯罪現(xiàn)狀透析[J];公安研究;2008年08期

9 張亞明;黃梅麗;;基于公共選擇理論的腐敗治理制度研究[J];內(nèi)蒙古社會科學(漢文版);2011年03期

10 劉利利;薛耀文;;高低級別公職人員經(jīng)濟犯罪隱蔽性比較研究[J];經(jīng)濟與管理;2012年09期

中國博士學位論文全文數(shù)據(jù)庫 前1條

1 李勇;當代中國腐敗問題研究[D];東北大學;2008年

本文編號：2111453